Gatso Dodgers' Deadly Game
Author
Discussion

cazzo

Original Poster:

15,679 posts

288 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
www.autoexpress.co.uk/?news/ae_news_story.php?id=43395

Gatso Dodgers' Deadly Game

Motorists are going to crazy lengths to avoid getting caught on camera - by driving on the wrong side of the road! If they believe they are speeding and likely to get snapped by a Gatso, maverick drivers are dicing with death and risking a collision with oncoming traffic.

The theory is if you avoid the little white lines on the road you can't be prosecuted. But police say the potentially deadly manoeuvre does not work - the lens will snap your plate whichever side of the road you're on. What's more, offenders may face further charges for dangerous driving.

News of the high-risk strategy comes from the West Yorkshire Casualty Reduction Partnership, which monitors local Gatsos. Spokesman Philip Gwynne said they'd filmed a number of near misses. He told us: "Drivers pulling out of side streets won't be looking for vehicles coming from the wrong direction, and neither will pedestrians crossing the road."

Meanwhile, scores of speed cameras in London are to be removed or resited as the detection rate of offences is so low they can't be justified. The news follows a survey by Gatso operators.


Safety Cameras eh?

PetrolTed

34,461 posts

324 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
Err.. it's our headline story too!

www.pistonheads.com/speed/default.asp?storyId=7899

deltaf

6,806 posts

274 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
I was followed by a taxi that did just that, swerved onto the other lane....the idiot didnt realise the camera was empty.

Kurgis

166 posts

264 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
yeah crazy crazy stuff - there've been several very close calls so far - I don't know of anyone being injured (yet ) but ......

:nono

cazzo

Original Poster:

15,679 posts

288 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
PetrolTed said:
Err.. it's our headline story too!

www.pistonheads.com/speed/default.asp?storyId=7899



Ooops Sorry hadn't seen it

_Al_

5,618 posts

279 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
cazzo said:
scores of speed cameras in London are to be removed or resited as the detection rate of offences is so low they can't be justified.



So there haven't been any crashes in London this year?

puggit

49,398 posts

269 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
money grabbers said:
"Drivers pulling out of side streets won't be looking for vehicles coming from the wrong direction, and neither will pedestrians crossing the road."
FFS - educate people to look both ways then!!! It's a simple way of staying alive while driving!

Green cross code would sort out the pedestrians - anyone who doesn't look both ways deserves to be hit!

I learnt the 1st point when almost hit coming out on to a NSL road once when 17!

cptsideways

13,805 posts

273 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
If it's planned & executed safely then surely whats the difference between this & a planned overtaking manouver?


I for one freely admit to overtaking (where it is safe to so Mary!) those who don't know what the speed limit is & then brake as they pass a camera. Instead of reducing my gap, I often indicate & just waft past in perfect safety.

I am aware that some Cameras are set at juntions etc so it's not always wise, but most of them are not, many are on NSL roads where it can be perfectly safe do so.

Applying Flak Jacket & digging a bunker rapidly......


>> Edited by cptsideways on Thursday 22 January 12:11

DustyC

12,820 posts

275 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
cazzo said:
He told us: "Drivers pulling out of side streets won't be looking for vehicles coming from the wrong direction, and neither will pedestrians crossing the road."



Well theres your problem straight away.

Yet again its lack of education.

Green cross code says look right, look left, look right again.
Im sure when I was taught to drive I was told to look both ways when pulling out of a junction too!

cptsideways

13,805 posts

273 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
Here lies the problem:

Who is taught how to safely overtake? eg not to overtake at juntions & petrol stations etc, no-one unless they take it upon themselves to be taught.

Who remembers to look both ways upon exiting a junction?, almost no-one.

Lack of education & lack of regular training is the root cause of accidents at these sites, thats why they sometimes put Gatso's up near them.

Of course the root cause is the problem & thats where the solution lies.

However if its safe to overtake near one why not?


>> Edited by cptsideways on Thursday 22 January 12:55

oyster

13,400 posts

269 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
I've seen this at traffic lights too where there has been a camera. When red light shows for straight ahead, cars use the right turn feeder lane to pass straight through. The camera doesn't seem to pick them up.

I saw this one night at a Junction on the A217 and decided to go through the red myself (was stationary waiting for green) and follow the van. I did, called the police, told them the number plate, and said they could do nothing about it as it was the job of the camera to sort the problem.

I'm still awaiting a response to a letter to the Commissioner in response to this. I've threatened legal action.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

276 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
[quote=cazzo But police say the potentially deadly manoeuvre does not work - the lens will snap your plate whichever side of the road you're on.[/quote]

Even on a dual carriageway?

v8thunder

27,647 posts

279 months

Thursday 22nd January 2004
quotequote all
Just proves that speed cameras don't even work on the principle of slowing speeders down - they work on the instinct of wealth and licence preservation, which is what is on people's minds as they pass them.