What's more eco-friendly?
What's more eco-friendly?
Author
Discussion

71notout

Original Poster:

3,674 posts

266 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
In an office environment...

is it better to boil a full kettle of water, thereby leaving some with residual heat so that colleagues coming for coffee after you don't have to boil it as long?

Or only boil the amount you need yourself each time?

Don't worry, i'm not a lentil-munching ecoist, it just kinda popped into my head whilst making a cuppa tea this afternoon.

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

271 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
Like cocaine, exercise, and dwarf murder, the best approach is 'little and often'

K87

2,111 posts

216 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
71notout said:
In an office environment...

is it better to boil a full kettle of water, thereby leaving some with residual heat so that colleagues coming for coffee after you don't have to boil it as long?

Or only boil the amount you need yourself each time?

Don't worry, i'm not a lentil-munching ecoist, it just kinda popped into my head whilst making a cuppa tea this afternoon.
Just boil what you need, if you boil more it will use more energy in the first plaec, then when they reheat it it uses more.

Obvious really

ad551

1,502 posts

242 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
Boil a full kettle. Takes longer. More time away from desk. smile

71notout

Original Poster:

3,674 posts

266 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
But surely a 3/4 full kettle will hold heat longer than less so it takes less time to reboil?

You're thinking assumes it has time to cool completely before reheating..no? (Edit:@K87)

JAYB - cheers!

Edited by 71notout on Monday 23 November 14:43

Odie

4,187 posts

211 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
The most energy efficient thing is to not fully boil the water but to get it hot enough so it makes a good cuppa (say 98 Degrees C) you can save loads of energy like that.

WorAl

10,877 posts

217 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
make cuppas for the whole office you selfish turd biggrin

Steamer

14,183 posts

242 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
Just boil enough for yourself.

because everyone else in the office is a cock socket

tegwin

1,682 posts

235 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
Odie said:
The most energy efficient thing is to not fully boil the water but to get it hot enough so it makes a good cuppa (say 98 Degrees C) you can save loads of energy like that.
no...NO NO.... the water needs to "vigourously boil" in order to make a proper pot of English tea!

trooperiziz

9,457 posts

281 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
In a very real sense, it makes no difference...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energ...

Dr.Doofenshmirtz

16,952 posts

229 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
tegwin said:
Odie said:
The most energy efficient thing is to not fully boil the water but to get it hot enough so it makes a good cuppa (say 98 Degrees C) you can save loads of energy like that.
no...NO NO.... the water needs to "vigourously boil" in order to make a proper pot of English tea!
Absolutely...also, boiling the water more than once spoils the taste.

Balmoral Green

42,561 posts

277 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
How about having a Thermos jug nearby? put the excess boiled water into that, it can be used later, or returned to the kettle if it's cooled down too much.

GuinnessMK

1,608 posts

251 months

Kermit power

29,622 posts

242 months

Monday 23rd November 2009
quotequote all
tegwin said:
Odie said:
The most energy efficient thing is to not fully boil the water but to get it hot enough so it makes a good cuppa (say 98 Degrees C) you can save loads of energy like that.
no...NO NO.... the water needs to "vigourously boil" in order to make a proper pot of English tea!
Which is exactly what will happen to water at 98 degrees centrigrade, always assuming you're 700 or so metres above sea level.