New one. Based on guess what......
New one. Based on guess what......
Author
Discussion

dandare1001

Original Poster:

52 posts

206 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Spotted this today. http://www.m-racing.info/car.php

It's been a long time coming (pics of front end were about 2 years ago).
I like the front clip, but not too keen on the rest. Still, if it works...

Notice there's no mention of its origins!

deevlash

10,442 posts

266 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
That rear end is the ugliest thing on the planet! The fronts not bad I guess but what was the guy thinking?

dandare1001

Original Poster:

52 posts

206 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
He used to sell GTRs in Germany that were "vastly" improved to the originals, according to the site a few years ago.

The side pod shaping leaves a lot to be desired, and yes the rear looks nasty.

I might buy a front end from him if I don't get around to modifying my own.
The wheels are from ATS. I like them.

ROWDYRENAULT

1,294 posts

243 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
Seeing something that ugly makes me appreciate how well integrated the GTR really is. Yes I would like to see a simpler solution to the headlights, but the GTR is well done from every angle. One of the car events that I went to until it was closed a couple weeks ago was Super Car Sunday. It was very common to have car people of some note be at this event. Designers from the Los Angeles design studios of G.M, Audi, ect. Students and teachers from the Pasedena design center college attended. Jay Leno, and several Pebble Beach Concours winners ect. All of them looked at the GTR I never heard a bad word spoken about the design of the car. Yes sometimes they knew I was the owner but in many instances they didn't. The only guy that ever bad mouthed the car was a kid with a tesler electric car said he could outrun the GTR in straight line. I asked him if he had the pink slip, he changed the subject. Lee

deevlash

10,442 posts

266 months

Tuesday 24th November 2009
quotequote all
ROWDYRENAULT said:
I never heard a bad word spoken about the design of the car
dont go searching my posts then hehe

ROWDYRENAULT

1,294 posts

243 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
Why would I listen to somebody who drives a Puma try to explain what good car design looks like? The fact that a lot of the so called short comings of the Ultima products are pointed out by folks who have never built or driven one of the cars, Speaks loudly. Lee

deevlash

10,442 posts

266 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
ROWDYRENAULT said:
Why would I listen to somebody who drives a Puma try to explain what good car design looks like? The fact that a lot of the so called short comings of the Ultima products are pointed out by folks who have never built or driven one of the cars, Speaks loudly. Lee
God knows why building or driving a car should have any relation to an opinion about its looks but anyway, I studied Product Design at uni so Im qualified to have an opinion on how stuff looks, I dont work in the field but I maintain a keen interest in automotive design. The Puma isnt a bad looking car and as it was my first car has worked out pretty well, insurance etc wasnt too bad, I didnt buy it to express my belief that the car was somehow the best looking thing on the road, I bought it to get me to work and have a mildly interesting drive at the same time.

So, car snobbery aside, why the personal attack on someone who dared to mention that your choice of car might be a bit on the ugly side? Lets face it, Top Gear wont have it on, probably as it looks a bit nasty in spite of it actually being a brilliant car. The Glass house of the Ultima is too tall in relation to the front of the car, the quad headlights are awful and the rear has no depth to it making it appear cheap. IMO one of the major problems is that the car was clearly designed in profile where it looks good, then the gap between the 2 sides just kind of filled in.

The front view is awful as the glass house is far too big compared to the body of the car and it ends up looking like a goldfish bowl with ears. Then the very front is even lower and makes the whole thing look top heavy and melted in the middle. Basically the proportions are all over the place and it clearly wasnt designed by someone who has studied car aesthetics for very long. Lee Noble doesnt design pretty cars, he never has and probably never will, good cars yes, pretty? No.




crafty

2,291 posts

266 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
deevlash said:
So, car snobbery aside, why the personal attack
You cant seriously expect to avoid a toasting:

1. This is the Ultima forum.
2. We are car snobs.
3. You drive a Poo-ma.






spatz

1,783 posts

215 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
go back to the puma forum please

GTRCLIVE

4,193 posts

312 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
Sorry Mr Devil but you just don't get the point...... and I'm not even going to explain as you clearly never will..... BYE...

Supertoadylight

278 posts

225 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
I think everyone (Poo-face-Puma included) punch has missed the point that the car was designed to look like 1980's group C Le Mans car.

1. This was the design intention! It worked too, how can you say this does not look familiar....



2. Personally - and not just Ultima folk included in this sentiment - how can it look Dated - the design perfectly achieves what it was set out to do - and is timeless. It looks like an older car - but looking slightly older is the WHOLE BEAUTY of the car! thumbup


3. Seeing said evidence - that's probably why a customer would buy the car - therefore saying "it looks old and dated" etc. etc. is missing the point. That's like buying the new Queen "Greatest Hits" album - then getting disappointed they didn't do a "remix" with David Guetta to We are the Champions.... banghead

John


Edited by Supertoadylight on Wednesday 25th November 09:24

UltimaCH

3,181 posts

218 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all


Well, it really looks like a very serious nasty "insect". The back end is very laaaaaarge. The cockpit is cramped and lower than the Ultima and the haircuts and mustache very 70's biglaugh

dandare1001

Original Poster:

52 posts

206 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
I agree with some of your sentiments, deevlash.
I bought the car for the pleasure of driving probably one of the best sportscars on the market. The styling (of which I'm also none too keen on) is of secondary importance.

Some Ultima owners feel quite strongly about this, but I'm ok with constructive criticism (especially since I never had a hand in designing the car). smile

Supertoadylight

278 posts

225 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
UltimaCH said:


Well, it really looks like a very serious nasty "insect". The back end is very laaaaaarge. The cockpit is cramped and lower than the Ultima and the haircuts and mustache very 70's biglaugh
The Ultima is less different than you think,

the "70's" mustache is neatly sported by my dad Peter!!!!

..so the Supertoadylight Ultima really is "in keeping" with the Porsche! biglaugh

singlecoil

35,825 posts

275 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
Seeing as the topic of the Ulitma's design has come up, can I ask why the back of the cockpit is so much lower that the front? Doesn't this restrict the headroom somewhat, for no apparent reason?

UltimaCH

3,181 posts

218 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
Supertoadylight said:
UltimaCH said:


Well, it really looks like a very serious nasty "insect". The back end is very laaaaaarge. The cockpit is cramped and lower than the Ultima and the haircuts and mustache very 70's biglaugh
The Ultima is less different than you think,

the "70's" mustache is neatly sported by my dad Peter!!!!

..so the Supertoadylight Ultima really is "in keeping" with the Porsche! biglaugh
Interesting.... If it's not too indiscreet, what was your father Peter doing back then in a Porsche racer on the road?

andygtt

8,345 posts

293 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
Seeing as the topic of the Ulitma's design has come up, can I ask why the back of the cockpit is so much lower that the front? Doesn't this restrict the headroom somewhat, for no apparent reason?
picture were your head goes in relations to the seat that you can just make out also taking into account that you rarelly rest your head against the seat.

Guess the point is it doesnt really restrict headroom at all and from a design point it actually gives the impression of the cockpit being larger than it actually is when your inside the car.

TuxMan

9,011 posts

267 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
Lee Noble doesnt design pretty cars, he never has and probably never will, good cars yes, pretty? No.

interesting statement !!!

[pic][/pic]

[pic][/pic]

these 2 pictures prove you are talking out your arse !!!


after all beauty is in the eye of the beholder !!! perhaps you could put a picture up of your "boyfriend or girlfriend" and we can give you our opinion .

Supertoadylight

278 posts

225 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
UltimaCH said:
Supertoadylight said:
UltimaCH said:


Well, it really looks like a very serious nasty "insect". The back end is very laaaaaarge. The cockpit is cramped and lower than the Ultima and the haircuts and mustache very 70's biglaugh
The Ultima is less different than you think,

the "70's" mustache is neatly sported by my dad Peter!!!!

..so the Supertoadylight Ultima really is "in keeping" with the Porsche! biglaugh
Interesting.... If it's not too indiscreet, what was your father Peter doing back then in a Porsche racer on the road?
aha - we are talking at cross purposes and its my typing that failed me! paperbag Its not him in the porsche no - it was a small dig at the fact dad has a 70's style mustache!!! (which hes had for 33 years apparently!)

deevlash

10,442 posts

266 months

Wednesday 25th November 2009
quotequote all
TuxMan said:
these 2 pictures prove you are talking out your arse !!!


after all beauty is in the eye of the beholder !!! perhaps you could put a picture up of your "boyfriend or girlfriend" and we can give you our opinion .
the nobles rear end is an abomination, whats that curve doing over the rear wheels? It isnt relfected anywhere else in the entire car and thats before we even get to the chav tastic spoiler. I dont even think a lot of ultima GTR owners like the can am! Beauty is in the eye of the beholder though so as long as youre happy with them thats fine. Posting a picture of a person to back up my claims would be totally pointless, they werent designed, unless you're a god botherer.