Do you ever cycle on the pavement?
Do you ever cycle on the pavement?
Author
Discussion

Salgar

Original Poster:

3,285 posts

208 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Following on from the other 'do you ever' threads, I was wondering if anyone ever cycles on the pavement?

I'm not talking about avoiding traffic lights.

On my 7 mile commute, about half way through is a 0.6 mile stretch of one way road. In the morning it's fine as I can go down that piece of road, or indeed through the park next door. But on my way home, the park is closed and the road is one way. For this part of my journey I choose to take the pavement as It would add around another 0.7ish miles on to my journey if I wanted to follow the one way road round the block. I only do this because this piece of road/pavement is very very quiet, and I hardily ever come across a pedestrian. Once a week there is a group of runners which have some kind of running group down that road, at which point I make alternate arrangements.

This is the segment of road i'm talking about. I have to get from A to B.
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&source=s_d&a...

Does any one else do this?

Lord Pikey

3,257 posts

239 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Yes, as much as possible.

Digga

46,553 posts

307 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Yes, except on modern, suburban estate, where I like to cycle accross the open-plan front gardens.

t84

6,941 posts

218 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Yes, dont see the problem if theres no pedestrians, I'd rather someone tut at me than get clipped by a car.

mouseymousey

2,642 posts

261 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Nope, I go the long way around.

IainT

10,040 posts

262 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Many of the pavements around my office (North Greenwich) are dual signed as bike/ped so yes. Some sections are suddenly ambiguous too with a lack of the repeating signs.

snotrag

15,509 posts

235 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Yes.

I pose far less of a risk to pedestrians on the pavement, than buses and HGV's do to me on the road.

Of course, it very much depends on the situation, type of pavement, number of people etc. I wouldnt try and ride my bike along a crowded narrow street of shoppers.


I once got stopped by the Police while riding along a huge, wide, deserted, (very safe) pavement in Sheffield.

They told me how i was supposed to be on the road (Busy A-Road, traffic going every which way, lights, junctions, lane changes, all sorts).

I said fine, I wonder if it will be you who gets the call to shovel me off the road into a bin bag and take me back to my Parents when I get flattened by a Quarry truck.

He thought about it for a minute, accepted I was right, and sent me on my way.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

222 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Just tell them your mum and dad won't let you pedal on the road.

HRG

72,863 posts

263 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Frequently biggrin

john_p

7,073 posts

274 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
Where safe to do so, yes.

Accelebrate

5,574 posts

239 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
The issue I have with road layouts for cyclists is the lack of consistency, certainly in Oxford I'd rather the councils encouraged cyclists to be 'proper' road users or took the opposite approach rather than the halfway house they have at the moment.

In some places cycle lanes will appear on footpaths, these are only denoted by a white line splitting the footpath in two with the odd bike symbol, they will often appear alongside traffic lights to allow cyclists to continue through on red. There's a number of issues with this:

  • Pedestrians generally ignore the cycle lanes, the lanes outside schools are often packed with children and parents and its dangerous to use them most of the time.
  • The lanes often have an array of obstacles in them, traffic lights, road signs etc. Pedestrians have to stand in the cycle lanes to wait at crossings.
  • The lanes are usually heavily undulating due to the dropped kerbs, doesn't make for a comfortable ride.
  • Car drivers often pull into the lanes without checking to see if they're clear, only seeing the road as the obstacle.
  • The lanes often stop or disappear suddenly, leaving you unintentionally on a footpath.
  • Giving cyclists the ability to skip red lights legitimately in some places just encourages poor road use elsewhere.
For those reasons I don't bother with them, in a city roads seem a lot safer, oddly.

cw42

976 posts

255 months

Thursday 3rd December 2009
quotequote all
While out cycling on my road bike last night, I took to the pavement a number of times. First was to allow the cars behind me on a narrow hill climb to pass safely as they were beginning to bunch up, then on another hill I jumped on the pavement while the car coming towards me was able to go round the car parked on his side safely. Then to allow the following lorry to pass me safely, and finally to scoot through the rush hour traffic safely while the drivers all hugged the curb!
Feel a lot safer on the pavement than on the road at that time of day (5pm)

pdV6

16,442 posts

285 months

Friday 4th December 2009
quotequote all
Time to dig this site out again!

Digga

46,553 posts

307 months

Friday 4th December 2009
quotequote all
Stayed with freinds in Dusseldorf earlier this eyar and was reminded how the German's have (with charateristic pragmatism and efficiency) deal with the issue. Where their pavements are sufficiently wide, it is acceptable for cycles to use the part of the pavement closest to the road, whilst pedestrians use the other half. I've seen this before in Munich IIRC.

Works pretty well on the whole, I guess because cycles are far less likely to kill or seriously maim pedestrains than vehicles are to do likewise to cyclists.

Edited by Digga on Friday 4th December 12:37

soad

34,365 posts

200 months

Friday 4th December 2009
quotequote all
I used to, but pedestrians were put off on many occassions.

So I don't anymore, unless it's well clear/safe.

Very difficult to keep the speed up too (due to curbs etc).

Edited by soad on Saturday 5th December 10:44

EdJ

1,379 posts

219 months

Friday 4th December 2009
quotequote all
Occasionally if there are roadworks or similar. But I avoid it if I can, partly because it just slows you down too much. I really hate the cycle lanes on pavements because they are impossible to maintain momentum due to pedestrians forgetting it's a cycle lane.

Agree with the German / Scandi comment - they get it so right there. We have a lot to learn...

Henry Hawthorne

6,488 posts

240 months

Friday 4th December 2009
quotequote all
Used to constantly (when I was a lot younger). One memorable moment when I was about 13, coming back from chip shop, blasting along path, lady walks out of drive trolleying suitcase behind her, stupid me on bicycle hits case, over handlebars.

She says "Oh dear, that was your fault! But are you okay?"

Stupid me replies "No, it was your fault!" and I just rode off. hehe Oh dear, how times have changed...

Never ride on the path anymore except when it's clear for ages and I fancy a bit of "variety"/lots of traffic is building up behind me on a hill etc.

AyBee

11,193 posts

226 months

Saturday 5th December 2009
quotequote all
Nope, much more likely to get my handlebars clipped by a pedestrian sending me off the bike than being hit by a car IMHO! And a road bike is, well, for the road biggrin

mchammer89

3,127 posts

237 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
Road or cycle lane only, I have no idea why people choose to cycle on the pavement.

HRG

72,863 posts

263 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
mchammer89 said:
Road or cycle lane only, I have no idea why people choose to cycle on the pavement.
Oh really???