Real World MPG Figures, Diesel X5 & 5 series models
Discussion
hi ppl,
just moving house at the min and will be communting a bit futher and i am currently running a cayenne 3.2 v6, urban driving only getting 16 mpg!!!, just over 20 on motorway.
so think its got to go, but unsure if a 2004/2005 diesel X5 would be getting much more mpg on an urban cycle to work and back. someone told me you can get 25-30 of them.
or was considering buying a 2005/2006 diesel 5 series, but not sure which size engine to go for between the 2.0, 2.5 or 3.0 and same question with what mpg these engines tend to get on the daily commute to work.
any mpg figures would be great from people who are actually running them day to day, i know all the offical figures, but i know from experiance these can be pretty different.
thx for the help ppl, might be back in beemer land soon !!!
just moving house at the min and will be communting a bit futher and i am currently running a cayenne 3.2 v6, urban driving only getting 16 mpg!!!, just over 20 on motorway.
so think its got to go, but unsure if a 2004/2005 diesel X5 would be getting much more mpg on an urban cycle to work and back. someone told me you can get 25-30 of them.
or was considering buying a 2005/2006 diesel 5 series, but not sure which size engine to go for between the 2.0, 2.5 or 3.0 and same question with what mpg these engines tend to get on the daily commute to work.
any mpg figures would be great from people who are actually running them day to day, i know all the offical figures, but i know from experiance these can be pretty different.
thx for the help ppl, might be back in beemer land soon !!!

Tailor_Mike said:
thx for the replys ppl,
always good to real feedback
i do about 8000 a year, so wouldnt be a huge saving per week, but still prob work out about £1k a year less in fuel ??? if i was to swap to an X5 diesel or poss 5 series diesel.
If we assume a 25mpg average for a petrol and 35 for a diesel (or near values in that ratio) then you are likely to pay around £400 more for petrol per year. At anything less than 10-12k miles per year, the consumption would not be playingmuch of a part in my decision-making process as petrols are simpler set ups mechanically, without turbos (flaps etc etc ) etc. to go wrong in the longer term. always good to real feedback

i do about 8000 a year, so wouldnt be a huge saving per week, but still prob work out about £1k a year less in fuel ??? if i was to swap to an X5 diesel or poss 5 series diesel.
Edited by christer on Tuesday 15th December 10:56
christer said:
Tailor_Mike said:
thx for the replys ppl,
always good to real feedback
i do about 8000 a year, so wouldnt be a huge saving per week, but still prob work out about £1k a year less in fuel ??? if i was to swap to an X5 diesel or poss 5 series diesel.
If we assume a 25mpg average for a petrol and 35 for a diesel (or near values in that ratio) then you are likely to pay around £400 more for petrol per year. At anything less than 10-12k miles per year, the consumption would not be playingmuch of a part in my decision-making process as petrols are simpler set ups mechanically, without turbos (flaps etc etc ) etc. to go wrong in the longer term. always good to real feedback

i do about 8000 a year, so wouldnt be a huge saving per week, but still prob work out about £1k a year less in fuel ??? if i was to swap to an X5 diesel or poss 5 series diesel.
Tailor_Mike said:
my cayenne 3.2 petrol at the minute is only returning 16 mpg,thats mostly around town and a bit of motorway.
was thinking 30 mpg in an x5/5 series or similar would be a fair saving.but i did have a 2003 range rover 3.0 diesel before the cayenne and i had nothing but trouble with it, lots of EGR valve troubles and turbo holding power back etc.... so is putting me off changing a bit now you mention it. the range rover in general was pretty poor, lots of trouble with it and electrical problems etc..., but would have thought the X5 3.0 d would be more realiable, or is it a problem the turbo diesel engines can have in general ???
hmmm... bit confused as to what to do now, might seem better idea just to keep the cayenne and stump up the extra petrol costs, should only be doing an extra 50 miles a week anyway.
was thinking 30 mpg in an x5/5 series or similar would be a fair saving.but i did have a 2003 range rover 3.0 diesel before the cayenne and i had nothing but trouble with it, lots of EGR valve troubles and turbo holding power back etc.... so is putting me off changing a bit now you mention it. the range rover in general was pretty poor, lots of trouble with it and electrical problems etc..., but would have thought the X5 3.0 d would be more realiable, or is it a problem the turbo diesel engines can have in general ???
hmmm... bit confused as to what to do now, might seem better idea just to keep the cayenne and stump up the extra petrol costs, should only be doing an extra 50 miles a week anyway.
Edited by christer on Tuesday 15th December 10:56[/footnote]
[footnote]Edited by Tailor_Mike on Tuesday 15th December 19:58Edited by Tailor_Mike on Tuesday 15th December 19:58
Edited by Tailor_Mike on Tuesday 15th December 20:01
Gassing Station | BMW General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


