Baby Aston Martin Cygnet
Baby Aston Martin Cygnet
Author
Discussion

paulm3

Original Poster:

657 posts

247 months

cptsideways

13,811 posts

274 months

Thursday 17th December 2009
quotequote all
An Iq with some badge engineering

MadmanO/T People

908 posts

227 months

Thursday 17th December 2009
quotequote all
I've just lost all respect for Aston Martin.

The Riddler

6,565 posts

219 months

Thursday 17th December 2009
quotequote all
yes

Just an IQ with a slight restyle.

Not impressed, and at over £20k estimated price tag i doubt many will sell.

Still, will make a nice courtesy car if you send your AM in for a service smile

V_cirellio

1,076 posts

203 months

Sunday 27th December 2009
quotequote all
That is absalutely ghastly. A.M could have at least designed something more aesthetically pleasing to increase revenue

CatherineJ

9,586 posts

265 months

Sunday 27th December 2009
quotequote all
The guys on the Aston Martin section of ph seam to be really quite fond of it.

biggrin

dandarez

13,847 posts

305 months

Sunday 27th December 2009
quotequote all
When you think Rover got slagged off for badge engineering!

If it's your kind of thing, just go for the Toyota, buy an Aston Martin badge and stick it on the front and save 10 grand in the processbiggrin

No doubt it'll sell... let's face it, save the planet idiots are prepared to pay 16 grand for a G-Wiz, so...

Sad.

DickyC

56,454 posts

220 months

Wednesday 30th December 2009
quotequote all
Astons traditionally have their own engine. After the company's acquisition by Ford this was diluted to "an engine unique to Aston Martin" ie an Aston-only version of an existing engine.

If the Cygnet doesn't follow this dictum it will not be considered a true Aston by aficionados.

Twincam16

27,647 posts

280 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
I know the resons for its creation, but to my mind, Astons have to be exclusive.

Now, how long will it be before someone releases a bodykit for IQs that makes it look identical to a Cygnet?

Then every chav will own one, and thanks to the mechanical specification and the interchangeability of parts, will be able to enunciate with confidence:

"I have an Aston Martin.

Innit.

Blud."

Ceylon

374 posts

194 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
There is a bolt on kit for an MX5 to give a a baby Aston look. Even that looks better than the in house version!

sonnyb

80 posts

216 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Perhaps the next Bond car?

B_KING

8 posts

202 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
aston have lost allll my admiration for them. WTF was going though there heads when they thought about this?

Twincam16

27,647 posts

280 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
Aston Martin used to be my favourite car firm, and not necessarily due to 007 either - my favourite is the DB4GT Zagato. I remember a time when seeing one was an event in itself, you'd come into school and tell your mates 'I saw an Aston Martin this morning'.

Nowadays I see them every day, all in sterile-looking James Bond Resale Silver. Good-looking, yes, but not special any more. This has just made them a little bit less special.

People bang on about how their new marketing-led, populist approach is vital for survival in the modern market, but it really isn't at all.

Put it this way - Maserati are playing in the same market, their cars have comparable strengths, but none of the irritating gimmicks that Aston have succumbed to have found their way onto Maseratis. They don't have marketing meetings to decide what to rename their ignition keys. The dashboard doesn't say 'Potere, Bellezza, Spirito' when you fire up the engine, and they don't rely solely on a fictional secret agent to sell their cars (the 'recognition factor' of which seems to be forcing the design brief never to stray from the 'DB5 shape' in case Bond fans fail to recognise their favourite car, so we'll never get a modern equivalent of a DBS Vantage, Lagonda V8 or Virage again).

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

277 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
paulm3 said:
hmmm....
Stop that...irked

Bloody Aston Smartin...

VxDuncan

2,850 posts

256 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
B_KING said:
aston have lost allll my admiration for them. WTF was going though there heads when they thought about this?
I assume, though possibly incorrectly, that it's actually quite a clever move. VM's will soon have to meet average CO2 targets across the whole model range. IMO this is the cause of the other anomolies - three cylinder boxsters, hybrid Ferraris, and BMW reducing the cylinder count on the m-cars. By selling a reasonable amount of these things Aston can forget having to totally redesign the whole range to meet CO2 regs (if that is even possible), and concentrate on making good, traditional V8 and V12s. All whilst sticking a giant finger up to the EU. Good on them I say...

Twincam16

27,647 posts

280 months

Sunday 10th January 2010
quotequote all
VxDuncan said:
B_KING said:
aston have lost allll my admiration for them. WTF was going though there heads when they thought about this?
I assume, though possibly incorrectly, that it's actually quite a clever move. VM's will soon have to meet average CO2 targets across the whole model range. IMO this is the cause of the other anomolies - three cylinder boxsters, hybrid Ferraris, and BMW reducing the cylinder count on the m-cars. By selling a reasonable amount of these things Aston can forget having to totally redesign the whole range to meet CO2 regs (if that is even possible), and concentrate on making good, traditional V8 and V12s. All whilst sticking a giant finger up to the EU. Good on them I say...
Possibly, but they could have done it in a much better, more subtle way.

A similar conundrum appeared in the '80s, but they dealt with it so much better. Aston Martin used their Tickford subsidiary to kit out an MG Metro Turbo to the same interior standards as the V8 of the time. Some subtle Tickford badging, an aerodynamic bodykit and a little bit more power were the only clues. It was made by Aston Martin, marketed by Aston Martin as a 'tender' for V8 owners during the oil crisis of the early '80s, but it was NEVER an 'actual' Aston Martin. At one point in the oil crisis of the late '70s, they were planning to take the MGB under their wing too, for similar reasons.

They still have access to Tickford. They could still have produced a Tickford version of the IQ, or any other small car for that matter (I personally would have liked to see them use a small roadster, like the Daihatsu Copen, given a 'baby Vantage' look, badged the Tickford Roadster or something) without claiming it was an Aston Martin.

And without those absurd bulging bonnet vents too. It reminds me of those dummy plastic Ferrari V8s people put in the back of Peugeot 405C-based 360 Modena replicas.

Speedy1985

9 posts

196 months

Monday 11th January 2010
quotequote all
It's a shame that Aston Martin is running away from its nature... but the market has a great power over the brand's choices...and the "eco-market" is getting stronger and stronger. Brands have to step forward in terms of efficiency and environment friendship... has this been the right step??? probably not!!!

Disappointment...

Twincam16

27,647 posts

280 months

Monday 11th January 2010
quotequote all
Speedy1985 said:
It's a shame that Aston Martin is running away from its nature... but the market has a great power over the brand's choices...and the "eco-market" is getting stronger and stronger. Brands have to step forward in terms of efficiency and environment friendship... has this been the right step??? probably not!!!

Disappointment...
But that's the thing - they didn't actually have to call it an Aston Martin did they? It could have been a Tickford.

Speedy1985

9 posts

196 months

Monday 11th January 2010
quotequote all
yeah...but the mistake has been done...and the nature of the brand has been shaken...and 'polluted' by this eco-friendly IQ adaptation!!!

Edited by jeremyc on Monday 11th January 16:48