Pakistan court orders ears and noses to be cut off
Pakistan court orders ears and noses to be cut off
Author
Discussion

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,549 posts

272 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2009
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/842582...

clap

Actually sounds like a very good idea to me. If a little restrained in this particular instance. I do hope they ignored any pleasantries like anaesthetic (I rather suspect they will).

hornetrider

63,161 posts

235 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2009
quotequote all
An ear for an ear. Excellent justice.

EDLT

15,421 posts

236 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2009
quotequote all
So the two men were angry at not being allowed to inbreed?

HOGEPH

5,249 posts

216 months

Thursday 24th December 2009
quotequote all
They're be buggered if they wear spectacles!

zip929

670 posts

207 months

Thursday 24th December 2009
quotequote all
Seems fair to me.

thehawk

9,335 posts

237 months

Friday 25th December 2009
quotequote all
To spite their faces?

glazbagun

15,371 posts

227 months

Friday 25th December 2009
quotequote all
I remember thinking similar here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/77547...

Justice? Barbarism? Both?

It's apalling, but at the same time strangely difficult to argue against.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

285 months

Friday 25th December 2009
quotequote all
Have I got this right....?

If someone murders Russell Brand in pakistan...

Will the punishment be...

A cock for a cock...?

NoNeed

15,137 posts

230 months

Friday 25th December 2009
quotequote all
ear ear, couldn't agree more

anonymous-user

84 months

Friday 25th December 2009
quotequote all
About time too...bravo to the judge

Jasandjules

72,606 posts

259 months

Friday 25th December 2009
quotequote all
Sadly it says these orders have never been carried out.

okgo

42,160 posts

228 months

Friday 25th December 2009
quotequote all
Religion...

It's 100% mental.

Jasandjules

72,606 posts

259 months

Friday 25th December 2009
quotequote all
okgo said:
It's 100% mental.
Well, it's all in their heads, that's for certain.

Mondeohdear

2,046 posts

245 months

Friday 25th December 2009
quotequote all
Strange how a lot of people who spout on against sharia law seem to like the old testament style punishments dished out by it. I've been reading up a bit on it recently and a lot of it does make sense - apart from its treatment of sdultery and rape. Did you know that under sharia adultery can be commited without consent, and the punishment that applies is the same as if it was with consent. so, for instance, if a married woman is raped by an unmarried man he will get flogged whereas she will be stoned to death. I can't see how that is possibly just.

TotalControl

8,307 posts

228 months

Friday 25th December 2009
quotequote all
Mondeohdear said:
Strange how a lot of people who spout on against sharia law seem to like the old testament style punishments dished out by it. I've been reading up a bit on it recently and a lot of it does make sense - apart from its treatment of sdultery and rape. Did you know that under sharia adultery can be commited without consent, and the punishment that applies is the same as if it was with consent. so, for instance, if a married woman is raped by an unmarried man he will get flogged whereas she will be stoned to death. I can't see how that is possibly just.
Thats a lot different to what I had read. I've read that an abandonment from the victim (suggesting time is a healer) by everyone and/or from the area of the incident is best for a certain ammount of time, whereas the rapist needs killing. Different what different sects of a religion believe. It depends on how the translation is made as one word could have several meanings. Not all of it has to be from an extreme perspective.

Mondeohdear

2,046 posts

245 months

Saturday 26th December 2009
quotequote all
TotalControl said:
Mondeohdear said:
Strange how a lot of people who spout on against sharia law seem to like the old testament style punishments dished out by it. I've been reading up a bit on it recently and a lot of it does make sense - apart from its treatment of sdultery and rape. Did you know that under sharia adultery can be commited without consent, and the punishment that applies is the same as if it was with consent. so, for instance, if a married woman is raped by an unmarried man he will get flogged whereas she will be stoned to death. I can't see how that is possibly just.
Thats a lot different to what I had read. I've read that an abandonment from the victim (suggesting time is a healer) by everyone and/or from the area of the incident is best for a certain ammount of time, whereas the rapist needs killing. Different what different sects of a religion believe. It depends on how the translation is made as one word could have several meanings. Not all of it has to be from an extreme perspective.
From what I've been reading a lot of the problem with anti-rape laws is that it can only be proved to be non-consensual by confession or the testimony of four male witnesses, neither of which is very likely. This article gives a general idea of the dilemma faced by strict Sharia legal systems.