free energy - proffessor john searl
Discussion
imagine if such tech could be replicated, governments would lose billions lol ....
http://www.searlsolution.com/index.html
thailand will become the first international country to start the development and manufacturing of the Searl Effect Technology...
http://www.searlsolution.com/index.html
thailand will become the first international country to start the development and manufacturing of the Searl Effect Technology...
Guam said:
AndrewW-G said:
Looks like some sort of magnetic perpetual motion gizmo 
May be me but I cant help but be extremely skeptical about these magic free energy solutions whenever they appear (coldwater fusion anyone)?
Very skeptical.
Also;
"The SEG is a device precisely constructed to these principles, enabling it to produce a stable and useful power output at the rate of approximately 200 watts per kilogram of the generator’s mass for the smallest unit."
Can't do the math myself but give the UKs consumption is 3.28700 × 10^14 watts per Annum.
That would suggest even if the efficiency was doubled in larger units it would still be a very large waste of time given the engineering and maintenance.
Certainly seems unlikely that the technology would save the world as the website suggests.
Also;
"The SEG is a device precisely constructed to these principles, enabling it to produce a stable and useful power output at the rate of approximately 200 watts per kilogram of the generator’s mass for the smallest unit."
Can't do the math myself but give the UKs consumption is 3.28700 × 10^14 watts per Annum.
That would suggest even if the efficiency was doubled in larger units it would still be a very large waste of time given the engineering and maintenance.
Certainly seems unlikely that the technology would save the world as the website suggests.
mrmr96 said:
Nuclear energy is pretty much free. This magnet stuff is just nonsense.
I'm convinced that fusion, cold or not, will eventually be a viable source of energy. Unfortunately, at the rate things are going, it probably won't be in my lifetime. I would love to see the effect it would have on the human race. Clean, cheap energy for everyone? Awesome. Although no doubt we'd have to find other things to have wars over 
Interesting..
said:
"The SEG is an 'open system' of energy conversion that is in accordance known thermodynamic laws;"
Good so far.. However.. said:
"The Searl Effect is based on magnetic waveforms that generates a continual motion of magnetized rollers around magnetized rings. Energy conversion while operating involves processing of random quantum fluctuations and kinetic energy within the atomic lattice into coherent currents of electron pairs formed between two-dimensional boundaries of different type materials."
..sets off my quack alarms.Mario149 said:
mrmr96 said:
Nuclear energy is pretty much free. This magnet stuff is just nonsense.
I'm convinced that fusion, cold or not, will eventually be a viable source of energy. Unfortunately, at the rate things are going, it probably won't be in my lifetime. I would love to see the effect it would have on the human race. Clean, cheap energy for everyone? Awesome. Although no doubt we'd have to find other things to have wars over 
It's been a long time since my physics days but it seems unlikely that it'll ever be achieved. It could just be a fundamental fact that the mass of the reactor has to equal to a star. At least that's the impression I got from Spiderman 2.
More than that we've got a fusion reacter a mere 8 light minutes away. Surely there must be a way of using that one beyond w
k solar panels?G_T said:
Do you not reckon fusion will remain a pipedream?
It's been a long time since my physics days but it seems unlikely that it'll ever be achieved.
It's achieved regularly. It's sustaining the reaction and getting back more energy than you have to put in that's causing a few engineering headaches.It's been a long time since my physics days but it seems unlikely that it'll ever be achieved.
Einion Yrth said:
G_T said:
Do you not reckon fusion will remain a pipedream?
It's been a long time since my physics days but it seems unlikely that it'll ever be achieved.
It's achieved regularly. It's sustaining the reaction and getting back more energy than you have to put in that's causing a few engineering headaches.It's been a long time since my physics days but it seems unlikely that it'll ever be achieved.
Einion Yrth said:
G_T said:
Do you not reckon fusion will remain a pipedream?
It's been a long time since my physics days but it seems unlikely that it'll ever be achieved.
It's achieved regularly. It's sustaining the reaction and getting back more energy than you have to put in that's causing a few engineering headaches.It's been a long time since my physics days but it seems unlikely that it'll ever be achieved.
It's more the commercial applications that I believe will remain a pipedream.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




When did he become a Prof? What is he a Prof of?



