Would you buy this RS6?
Author
Discussion

zip929

Original Poster:

670 posts

208 months

Saturday 16th January 2010
quotequote all
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/2004-AUDI-4-2-RS6-QUATTRO-NO...

Seems a lot of car for the money.
A Cat D, which is what puts me off. Still tempting though...what you think?


Targarama

14,791 posts

314 months

Saturday 16th January 2010
quotequote all
"nothing recorded on logbook" - yes but you still need to declare when you come to sell it again. Check you can get insurance for it at a sensible price vs a non cat-d car too.

Dracoro

9,038 posts

276 months

Saturday 16th January 2010
quotequote all
Need to know what the "real" damage was, not what they say. i.e. pics and receipts etc. No evidence of damage and repair = no sale in my book.

To be written off, most insurers will look at damage of at least 50% of value of car + rental car costs etc.

So the damage would, on a car that's easily a £15k (?) car at £7,500 worth of damage minimum.

If it was a little bump, why on earth was it written off? Well the answer is, it wasn't a little bump biggrin

Unless you know what the real damage and repairs were, steer well clear.

Edited by Dracoro on Saturday 16th January 16:43

zip929

Original Poster:

670 posts

208 months

Saturday 16th January 2010
quotequote all
I always understood (perahps incorrectly) Cat C to be serious damage and Cat D to be fairly minor in comparison.
I have noticed that this car has been up for sale for quite a while, both on Ebay multiple times and AT.

Half of me says steer well clear and the other half says go for it.

I just don't know...

Dracoro

9,038 posts

276 months

Saturday 16th January 2010
quotequote all
zip929 said:
I always understood (perahps incorrectly) Cat C to be serious damage and Cat D to be fairly minor in comparison
On the whole yes BUT is is still a write off. The "bill" (including rental hire cost etc blah blah blah.....) would have to be approaching 5 figures to be write off.

Either way, the OP needs evidence of what damage was actually done and evidence of repairs etc.

I think it's overpriced anyway for something that's been written off. Only needs some work costing £2k/£3k etc. for it to cost that of a mint one and these things are NOT cheap to run.

If the damage was really minor and everything checks out etc. then £11k would sound right. Remember, when he comes to sell, few people will go anywhere near it since it's been written off in the past and those that do will want a significant amount off the price.

Rollcage

11,345 posts

223 months

Saturday 16th January 2010
quotequote all
zip929 said:
I always understood (perahps incorrectly) Cat C to be serious damage and Cat D to be fairly minor in comparison.
I have noticed that this car has been up for sale for quite a while, both on Ebay multiple times and AT.

Half of me says steer well clear and the other half says go for it.

I just don't know...
Three different types of car of the same value could suffer exactly the same damage and one could be a C, the other D and the other not written off at all.

You need to know exactly what the damage was, and make a judgement based on that alone.

oilyrag1424

33 posts

224 months

Saturday 16th January 2010
quotequote all
Cat C insurance company decided not to repair due to cost, Cat D customer did not want it repaired.

zip929

Original Poster:

670 posts

208 months

Saturday 16th January 2010
quotequote all
I agree with you both. More questions than answers with a Cat D.
I should probably avoid unless getting a massive discount.

Thanks for the input.

Rollcage

11,345 posts

223 months

Saturday 16th January 2010
quotequote all
oilyrag1424 said:
Cat C insurance company decided not to repair due to cost, Cat D customer did not want it repaired.
No.

Cat C, simple cost of repair greater than market value of vehicle, Cat D cost of repair and other factors such as hire car costs, etc exceed market value of vehicle.

(Usually! smile)

Simond001

4,519 posts

308 months

Saturday 16th January 2010
quotequote all
Often the cost of the hire car is the major factor now.

When my car was hit the hire car was £695 per day plus VAT.

With a 21 day delay for some parts writing it off was the cheapest option.

I'm not sure what the insurance company would allow to a replacement for an RS6, but if it was anon fault accident and a bolshy owner I can imagine a hefty claim.

ecain63

10,653 posts

206 months

Sunday 17th January 2010
quotequote all
Alot of guys on RS246.com have been debating this one and the answer was: Steer clear!

naffa

390 posts

229 months

Sunday 17th January 2010
quotequote all
Simond001 said:
Often the cost of the hire car is the major factor now.

When my car was hit the hire car was £695 per day plus VAT.
What was your hire car?
Or do hire car companies jump on the exaggerated claims bandwagon to?

zip929

Original Poster:

670 posts

208 months

Monday 18th January 2010
quotequote all
ecain63 said:
Alot of guys on RS246.com have been debating this one and the answer was: Steer clear!
Yes, probably not worth taking the chance.

Dr G

15,994 posts

273 months

Monday 18th January 2010
quotequote all
Also it is red O_o

Johnyanorak

57 posts

204 months

Monday 18th January 2010
quotequote all
I wouldnt
it is red which i dont think people go for
has the white/cream leathers which get dirty easy also wear away and go saggy
its 13,500 grand for a damaged car and i can garuntee it has been hammered as he wants an evo r32 m3
what do u do in them cars lads +/ ladys ?