Boom!
Author
Discussion

puggit

Original Poster:

49,225 posts

265 months

Thursday 5th February 2004
quotequote all
www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004052789,00.html

Vandals blow up a Gatso
A SPEED camera has been BLOWN UP on a road where four have now been destroyed.

Vandals strapped explosives to the Gatso in what is thought to be the first attack of its kind.

Army bomb experts were called after the detonation on the A37 at Emborough, Somerset.

Sir Elgar Jenkins, Bath and North East Somerset Council’s transport boss, said he understood motorists’ frustrations.

He said: “This attack is a reflection of the fact cameras are being spread all over the place.”

Other cameras on the 21-mile route from Bristol to Wells have had burning petrol-soaked tyres hung round them.

The speed traps, costing £40,000 each, are run by Avon, Somerset and Gloucestershire Safety Camera Partnership.

Its spokesman Dick Bowen said he was “disappointed” by the attack.

--------------------
Although I'd have to celebrate the removal of any camera, I am a bit reticent about using explosives!!

count duckula

1,324 posts

291 months

Thursday 5th February 2004
quotequote all
Tick tick tick boom,
As long as no people/private property is damaged, good stuff. Personally I would prefer them to be cut down and thrown into MP's gardens.

Malc

blueyes

4,799 posts

269 months

Thursday 5th February 2004
quotequote all
Its spokesman Dick Bowen said he was “disappointed” by the attack.



Does that mean he condones it but is recommending MORE explosive for a better visual effect?

Toffer

1,528 posts

278 months

Thursday 5th February 2004
quotequote all
puggit said:
www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004052789,00.html

Vandals blow up a Gatso

The speed traps, costing £40,000 each, are run by Avon, Somerset and Gloucestershire Safety Camera Partnership.


The Gatsos used to be reported as costing £80,000 each...are the safety camera partnerships getting bulk discounts?

anonymous-user

71 months

Thursday 5th February 2004
quotequote all
£40,000 per speed camera. But that's assuming there was actually a camera in the housing.

TVP said on TV a few weeks back that of all their camera sites, only a very small number actually contained cameras.

Don

28,378 posts

301 months

Thursday 5th February 2004
quotequote all
Well its not the first..there were reports last year and it won't be the last. I am concerned about the use of explosives though - however careful the people were. The point could have been as easily made in a far less dangerous fashion.

For example: A couple of bin liners, some duct tape and a hot air paint stripper...

NugentS

699 posts

264 months

Thursday 5th February 2004
quotequote all
Ok - why the hot air paint stripper?

anonymous-user

71 months

Thursday 5th February 2004
quotequote all
To melt the bin liner onto the lense, I'm guessing.

Not that I'd condone it, think about it or anything that may in any way be construed as being illegal or anti-social.

RichB

54,400 posts

301 months

Thursday 5th February 2004
quotequote all
Don said:
For example: A couple of bin liners, some duct tape and a hot air paint stripper...
And where are you going to plug in the hot air stripper?

DennisTheMenace

15,605 posts

285 months

Thursday 5th February 2004
quotequote all
12v-240v Power inverter , or a fecking long extension lead

hertsbiker

6,443 posts

288 months

Thursday 5th February 2004
quotequote all
I heard that a sledge hammer will reach high enough to rupture the lens........

cortinaman

3,230 posts

270 months

Friday 6th February 2004
quotequote all
puggit said:

A SPEED camera has been BLOWN UP



what i want to know is:-

1.what did they use?,was it tnt,nitroglycerine,semtex or c4???

2.why have they only blown up one with explosives?.....come to essex lads,i can think of and direct you to at-least 5 that are not situated outside schools/on high streets or at accident blackspots in southend.

fair play to ya guys!!



>> Edited by cortinaman on Friday 6th February 00:56

g_attrill

8,488 posts

263 months

Friday 6th February 2004
quotequote all
Hmm... I wouldn't recommend anybody blowing up speed cameras because there is the possibility of life imprisonment.

In the news reports they mentioned it was done with "commercially available" items, so I guess they mean gunpowder (antique guns) or possibly dynamite which, at least couple of years ago, could be bought without a licence.

Gareth

Roadrage

603 posts

261 months

Saturday 7th February 2004
quotequote all
g_attrill said:
Hmm... I wouldn't recommend anybody blowing up speed cameras because there is the possibility of life imprisonment.

In the news reports they mentioned it was done with "commercially available" items, so I guess they mean gunpowder (antique guns) or possibly dynamite which, at least couple of years ago, could be bought without a licence.


Gareth



could be anything High explosive are not that hard to make.
dynamite aint hard to make ether.

its fill the homade blasting caps safely that the hard bit

the ira only use to use semtex because they got plenty of ot laying about.

and it easy to handel and is safe enotgh to play football with.

it getting harde to bye sertain fertilizers to use as filler.

to be honist there no need to blow them up as such

a small shaped charge roung the pole would just make em fall over.

with littel danger to anyone unless the cam fell over on someones head.


Roadrage

603 posts

261 months

Saturday 7th February 2004
quotequote all
cortinaman said:

puggit said:

A SPEED camera has been BLOWN UP




what i want to know is:-

1.what did they use?,was it tnt,nitroglycerine,semtex or c4???

2.why have they only blown up one with explosives?.....come to essex lads,i can think of and direct you to at-least 5 that are not situated outside schools/on high streets or at accident blackspots in southend.

fair play to ya guys!!



>> Edited by cortinaman on Friday 6th February 00:56


nitroglycerine is prity useless on it own and very dangerous to handel even if you know what your doing

but it fairy easy to make ,but a bit dogy doing.

there much safe things to play with.

but can be used as a base for something safer to handell


my guess is it was a ferterlizer job with a homade blasting cap

or a diy pipe bomb depends mostly on the bomber skill level in cemistry realy could be anything

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

272 months

Saturday 7th February 2004
quotequote all
Roadrage said:



but it fairy easy to make ,but a bit dogy doing.



You Chinese, RR ?

Don

28,378 posts

301 months

Saturday 7th February 2004
quotequote all
DennisTheMenace said:
12v-240v Power inverter , or a fecking long extension lead



Ever the ingenious one...

deeen

6,226 posts

262 months

Saturday 7th February 2004
quotequote all
Don said:

DennisTheMenace said:
12v-240v Power inverter , or a fecking long extension lead




Ever the ingenious one...


not really, you'd need a Boy Scout on every roundabout!

g_attrill

8,488 posts

263 months

Sunday 8th February 2004
quotequote all
From the Telegraph:

Chris Hawkins said of the dynamite: "A pea-sized amount would do it.
There's enough quarries round here." But many people think the perpetrators
may have used explosive removed from fireworks, rather than dynamite taken
from a quarry.