Useless bomb detector risks lives
Useless bomb detector risks lives
Author
Discussion

Mojooo

Original Poster:

13,265 posts

198 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/84...

Any thoughts on this?

Should there be an investigation and who would that be down to? Absolutley crazy if this guy is making lots of money over this and they are totally useless.

dilbert

7,741 posts

249 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
If the detectees think it works, and the detectors know it's hokum, then it is possible that it's theatrical effect is actually useful.

andy_s

19,758 posts

277 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
They use these a lot - sold to many a developing country - poor buggers.

Anyone with any sense that's seen one has scratched their heads about it. I did a course ran by the archetypal mad professor Alford quoted in the article. We spent most of the time testing his latest gadgets, and what he doesn't know isn't worth, well, knowing.

Edited by andy_s on Friday 22 January 15:44

Jezza30

265 posts

197 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/84...

Any thoughts on this?

Should there be an investigation and who would that be down to? Absolutley crazy if this guy is making lots of money over this and they are totally useless.
Unbelievable! All paid for by the millions of dollars that were thrown into the country by the Americans no doubt. Poor blokes having to rely on such rubbish.

andy_s

19,758 posts

277 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
dilbert said:
If the detectees think it works, and the detectors know it's hokum, then it is possible that it's theatrical effect is actually useful.
It's a bit of an expensive bluff at $40,000 a pop, you could make your own out of an old tranny (radio) and a - actually, that's it - just an old radio.


Ironically, at least one person has made a bomb from it.

Edited by andy_s on Friday 22 January 15:53

FourWheelDrift

91,303 posts

302 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
First I have heard of them, can't believe anyone would fall for such a device the way it is said to (not) work. Terrible war profiteering. Don't they hang people for that?

Graykiraa

152 posts

225 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all

Mojooo

Original Poster:

13,265 posts

198 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
Graykiraa said:
Thats good. Fraud comesd with up 10 year years in jail.

Check out this quote

"McCormick hit back, however, telling the paper that “we have been dealing with doubters for ten years. One of the problems we have is that the machine does look a little primitive. We are working on a new model that has flashing lights.”"

lollage

dilbert

7,741 posts

249 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
andy_s said:
dilbert said:
If the detectees think it works, and the detectors know it's hokum, then it is possible that it's theatrical effect is actually useful.
It's a bit of an expensive bluff at $40,000 a pop, you could make your own out of an old tranny (radio) and a - actually, that's it - just an old radio.


Ironically, at least one person has made a bomb from it.

Edited by andy_s on Friday 22 January 15:53
Not if you figure you're going to get that sort of publicity. I'd say 40K is cheap if you never get the chance to run another business!

tybalt

1,100 posts

288 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
Shame the Nomadics FIDO is ITAR controlled really. Used to have one in my office, and it's a nifty bit of kit.

I would have thought they ought to be able to get something from Smiths Canada that wasn't ITAR though.

Maybe they can't buy anything that works due to trade controls and this is the route they are forced to go down. Theatrics and smoke and mirrors.

Deva Link

26,934 posts

263 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
If he's sold 6,000 of them at $40,000 a pop then it's no surprise he's not very interested in a $1,000,000 offer to prove they work!

fastfreddy

8,577 posts

255 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
"The training manual for the device says it can even, with the right card, detect elephants, humans and 100 dollar bills."

Well, if Iraq stop buying them as bomb detectors, there seems to be lots of other markets he can sell into!

If they have been exported to Iraq from the UK in such big numbers, you would have thought someone in the DTI should have looked at the operation a bit more closely and maybe even tested one of them?

Parrot of Doom

23,075 posts

252 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
I hope his company's assets are seized, and returned in full to the Iraqi government. Quickly followed by this man, who should be tried in the Iraqi justice system.

FourWheelDrift

91,303 posts

302 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
fastfreddy said:
"The training manual for the device says it can even, with the right card, detect elephants, humans and 100 dollar bills."
Is that to detect those famous invisible Elephants or the ones that hide in trees?

Because I don't need a detector to spot an Elephant. biggrin

tybalt

1,100 posts

288 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
If he's sold 6,000 of them at $40,000 a pop then it's no surprise he's not very interested in a $1,000,000 offer to prove they work!
He sold them at $8k per unit, and the rest went in kickbacks (sorry; training and 'middlemen').

Deva Link

26,934 posts

263 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
tybalt said:
Deva Link said:
If he's sold 6,000 of them at $40,000 a pop then it's no surprise he's not very interested in a $1,000,000 offer to prove they work!
He sold them at $8k per unit, and the rest went in kickbacks (sorry; training and 'middlemen').
I can't help having a sneaking admiration for the guy! He's probably a PHer with a raft of *very* flash cars. smile

mcdjl

5,620 posts

213 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
He's not the only person to have sold them....the article says they date back to the 1990s under a different name and have been rubbished several times in between.

FourWheelDrift

91,303 posts

302 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
Wouldn't it have been cheaper to hire Derek Acorah?

smack

9,760 posts

209 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
There is a report on this on Newsnight - ie. now.

CatherineJ

9,586 posts

261 months

Friday 22nd January 2010
quotequote all
It has just been on our local news. Apparently when the BBC turned up at their offices today, there was no one around.