F1 Teams agree to points system tweak
F1 Teams agree to points system tweak
Author
Discussion

Teppic

Original Poster:

8,075 posts

286 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
The F1 teams have agreed to tweak the new for 2010 points system (25-20-15-10-8-6-5-3-2-1), in order to reward race wins. The gap to second place is increased by two points, with other changes further down the order. The new system is 25-18-15-12-10-8-6-4-2-1

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/81048

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
The intention of this is to encourage overtaking isn't it? Surely it will only reward and encourage consistency as the cost of retiring with nothing is way too high.

stew-S160

8,020 posts

267 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
zac510 said:
The intention of this is to encourage overtaking isn't it? Surely it will only reward and encourage consistency as the cost of retiring with nothing is way too high.
probably is to encourage overtaking, but, common sense says, how can a slower car, behind a faster car, overtake? it can't.

Derek Smith

49,726 posts

277 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
I remember Berger taking off a another car through not being aware of what was going on around him. In his explanation afterwards he said something along the lines of: I didn't expect someone to bother about whether they came eighth or ninth. And therein lies the problem with some drivers.

So I suppose having points all the way down so that if you turn up at the circuit you've got some can be seen as good. But most drivers will go for an overtake anyway, won't they? I seem to remember that Hamilton went for third on the last lap in a last gasp pointless overtake. With that sort of competitiveness points are rather pointless.

The only time they will come into play is towards the end of the season when working out where you need to be to win the WDC. I've got the feeling that such calculating goes on nowadays.

stuttgartmetal

8,152 posts

245 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Two thirds worth more than a win ?
Hardly.
Should have made a win 40 points and second 25.
Make it worth the win.

ajprice

33,309 posts

225 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Its a better system the 6-5-3-2 was odd, having one point difference for 6-5 points, then 2 points difference for 5-3 points.

TheArchitect

1,238 posts

208 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
The FIA shouldn't announce the points system till the end of the season that way no one will know if they've done enough to win!

mchammer89

3,127 posts

242 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Good, the point system has been long overdue an overhaul.

mattikake

5,116 posts

228 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
stew-S160 said:
zac510 said:
The intention of this is to encourage overtaking isn't it? Surely it will only reward and encourage consistency as the cost of retiring with nothing is way too high.
probably is to encourage overtaking, but, common sense says, how can a slower car, behind a faster car, overtake? it can't.
Ha try telling that to Gilles Villeneuve! wink

This is a much better scoring system and makes far more sense as the 25-20- system had the same weighting as the old 10-8-6.

mko9

2,986 posts

241 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
I've always thought they should adopt the MotoGP point system, giving points well down the field.

williamp

20,388 posts

302 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
so nobody wants a etutn to the 60s pints system where you drop two scores and only count the best?

Or nascar style, where they get points for arriving at the circuit, points for starting the engine, points for...

(actually, I would like to see an additional point for fastest lap. With no refuelling allowed this year, this might give the slower cars a chance of somehting, if the driver can put together a really good lap)