Which new Cosworth team will be most sucessful in 2010?
Which new Cosworth team will be most sucessful in 2010?
Author
Discussion

Shergar

Original Poster:

2 posts

200 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Which of the new teams will score the most points or have the least DNFs? Virgin F1, Lotus, Campos or Team America (USF1)?

TheArchitect

1,238 posts

208 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Does williams come under this as theyre new to cosworth?

out of your list though lotus or virgin.

MiniMan64

19,356 posts

219 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Team America - fk YEAH!

bigburd

2,670 posts

229 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Lotus if excluding Williams, otherwise Williams

MiniMan64

19,356 posts

219 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
MiniMan64 said:
Team America - fk YEAH!
Oh sorry, you said MOST points....


xspencex

1,534 posts

265 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Gotta be Williams

BOFFIN

24 posts

241 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Thats if they get to the grid!!
How much power does anyone reckon that Cosworth engines got anyway?
Could be Virgin I reckon.

Racingdude009

5,303 posts

276 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Out of the new teams I would say Lotus without a doubt.

belleair302

7,008 posts

236 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Virgin F1 will be the most professional outfit out there and Manor have massive history and a good understanding of what is needed at every level. I doubt that Cosworth will deliver a decent package though and expect there to be far to many blow ups as they chase the M-B and Ferrari engines for performance, drive, low centre of gravity and fuel consumption.....with no refuelling!

Shergar

Original Poster:

2 posts

200 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
I believe the centre of gravity is set by the FIA so they should all be simular.
I think the Cosworth power will be on par with MB if not better. Reliability will be important for them!
Maybe Team America will be quick because they seem to have a magic car that designs and builds itself in record time!!

Jungles

3,587 posts

250 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
Ouch, hard one.

If Williams is included, then it will be the most successful. If it is excluded, then it will be a toss-up between Virgin/Manor and Campos-Meta: I'd pick Virgin/Manor on the strength of its drivers, and Campos-Meta on the strength of technical ability.

ajprice

33,308 posts

225 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
Shergar said:
Maybe Team America will be quick because they seem to have a magic car that designs and builds itself in record time!!
They'll turn up with a bag of carbon shards...

"We made a nosecone but we broke it, look!"

Forbes82

812 posts

208 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
Jungles said:
Ouch, hard one.

If Williams is included, then it will be the most successful. If it is excluded, then it will be a toss-up between Virgin/Manor and Campos-Meta: I'd pick Virgin/Manor on the strength of its drivers, and Campos-Meta on the strength of technical ability.
Out of interest what makes you think these two are better placed than Lotus? Gascoyne certainly has alot of recent F1 experience and the driver line up has experienced race winners on its side, which none of the others do.

Not saying you are wrong, i'm just surprised you put those two teams above Lotus when i think Lotus has the best drivers AND technical team behind it. I could be very wrong of course, but i'd be surprised if both teams you mention out perform Lotus.

kma

959 posts

223 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
I wouldn't be so sure about williams performing better than some of these new teams, they might have the history but they've been crap for years.

kma

959 posts

223 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
Oh & my money's on lotus btw.

bigburd

2,670 posts

229 months

Thursday 28th January 2010
quotequote all
ajprice said:
Shergar said:
Maybe Team America will be quick because they seem to have a magic car that designs and builds itself in record time!!
They'll turn up with a bag of carbon shards...

"We made a nosecone but we broke it, look!"
Stuart Scott (BritCar Mustang) turned up to one race with an "American Carbon Fibre" rear wing modification...When asked what made it American, the reply was "Steel" biggrin - That now has a European "real" Carbon Fibre rear wing smile

Mazda Baiter

37,069 posts

217 months

Thursday 28th January 2010
quotequote all
kma said:
I wouldn't be so sure about williams performing better than some of these new teams, they might have the history but they've been crap for years.
I will happily bet a whole packet of Jaffa Cakes that Williams will comfortably outperform all of the new teams. I would even go as far as; Williams will have as many points at the end of the season than Lotus, Virgin, Campos and USF1 put together.


The bet is on the table!

Jungles

3,587 posts

250 months

Thursday 28th January 2010
quotequote all
Forbes82 said:
Jungles said:
Ouch, hard one.

If Williams is included, then it will be the most successful. If it is excluded, then it will be a toss-up between Virgin/Manor and Campos-Meta: I'd pick Virgin/Manor on the strength of its drivers, and Campos-Meta on the strength of technical ability.
Out of interest what makes you think these two are better placed than Lotus? Gascoyne certainly has alot of recent F1 experience and the driver line up has experienced race winners on its side, which none of the others do.

Not saying you are wrong, i'm just surprised you put those two teams above Lotus when i think Lotus has the best drivers AND technical team behind it. I could be very wrong of course, but i'd be surprised if both teams you mention out perform Lotus.
Lotus is basically a new team. Sure, it has roots in Litespeed F3, but that category of racing is very far removed from F1, I think it's almost irrevelevant. Gascoyne is certainly a very experienced and capable engineer, but the team doesn't hinge on one man, it needs a group that is thoroughly oiled, and I think Lotus is lacking in that department in comparison with Campos or Virgin. I'm not saying they're bound to be rubbish: the opposite may be true, but I remain unconvinced.

The reason why I picked Campos Meta as the most technically-capable team is because of their partnership with Dallara: the company who produces cars for the IRL, GP2, World Series by Renault, etc. While Toni Cuquerella is not at the same level as Gascoyne in terms of experience and expertise in F1, I think he is qualified enough for his new role, and with his past experience in BMW Sauber, he knows how a competitive team runs. My only concern for Campos is their admission that they may not make winter testing, which is going to be a massive disadvantage in the early stages of the season.

I picked Virgin/Manor second because of Nick Wirth and his research firm. He is a very experienced F1 aerodynamicist and designer, and his company has enjoyed recent success with the Acura LMP1 car in the ALMS, which I think will translate well into F1.

Edited by Jungles on Thursday 28th January 23:52

garycat

5,377 posts

239 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
belleair302 said:
... I doubt that Cosworth will deliver a decent package though and expect there to be far to many blow ups as they chase the M-B and Ferrari engines for performance, drive, low centre of gravity and fuel consumption.....with no refuelling!
I dunno about that - the other engines were designed before the refuelling ban (and maybe the 18K rev limit?). Cosworth can design a frugal engine from scratch with a powercurve that exploits the lower rev limit

MiniMan64

19,356 posts

219 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
So the general concencous is that no one will be doing a Brawn pre-season and upsurging the form book then? hehe