advice (perverting course of justice)
advice (perverting course of justice)
Author
Discussion

yamai1

Original Poster:

15 posts

264 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
hello
i need some advice for a friend. he has three speeding incidents to which he has said it wasn't him. one on a motorway at over 100 and another two on the same day, over 35 on a 30 and over 95 on a 70. he has nominated two people that he knows can't be traced as they live abroad. he has been arrested for providing false evidence and for not providing proper details of the drivers at the time. he has to go to court soon. what should he do?

puggit

49,430 posts

270 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
Get a solicitor

_Al_

5,618 posts

280 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
Was he lying when he gave the details of the other drivers?

If so, I rather suspect he's in a lot of trouble. If not; contact them and get them to testify that they were in the country and could have been driving. The case should then be dropped.

Lying to the law = stupid.

yamai1

Original Poster:

15 posts

264 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
yes he has a solicitor. he's tried to get hold of the people in question but no luck. he provided details of them but one is in another country and the other is no where to be seen as he was only staying at an address given by my friend. what should he do?
he's also been vindicated to falsifying the notifications sent, but the hand writing analysis proves inconclusive.

hertsbiker

6,443 posts

293 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
_Al_ said:


Lying to the law = stupid.



Funny that.. I know of a few cases where telling the truth is stupid, and only caused trouble. Don't be so certain that doing the right thing is always a good idea.

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

266 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
Before the actual Court date his Solicitor should be in receipt of the Prosecutions evidence under Disclosure of Evidence Rule, if applied.

If as you say,the grounds for his arrest involve giving false details, then Plod will have made enquiries along these lines to prove this. What specific charge has been made against him.?

Starting to look as if someone is going to get a good stuffing????

But seriously there is a whole load of ifs and buts in the account and one needs all the facts of the case to form a judgement. The Solicitor is in this position. We are not.

DVD

yamai1

Original Poster:

15 posts

264 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
perverting the cause of justice

nonegreen

7,803 posts

292 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
hertsbiker said:

_Al_ said:


Lying to the law = stupid.




Funny that.. I know of a few cases where telling the truth is stupid, and only caused trouble. Don't be so certain that doing the right thing is always a good idea.



Tony Blair anyone?

jeffreyarcher

675 posts

270 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
yamai1 said:
yes he has a solicitor. he's tried to get hold of the people in question but no luck. he provided details of them but one is in another country and the other is no where to be seen as he was only staying at an address given by my friend. what should he do?
he's also been vindicated to falsifying the notifications sent, but the hand writing analysis proves inconclusive.

I think you're telling us porkies here, either he sent them or he didn't.

yamai1

Original Poster:

15 posts

264 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
he didn't send them at all. what would happen if the prosecution cannot get hold of the people to question the offences?

jeffreyarcher

675 posts

270 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
yamai1 said:
he didn't send them at all. what would happen if the prosecution cannot get hold of the people to question the offences?

As I said,
yamai1 said:
he has nominated two people that he knows can't be traced as they live abroad.

If you can't even get your lies straight here, I think you've had it in court.

yamai1

Original Poster:

15 posts

264 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
well, i meant that the two people that were driving the car at the time cannot be traced as he has tried to get hold of them.

FastShow

388 posts

274 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
yamai1 said:
well, i meant that the two people that were driving the car at the time cannot be traced as he has tried to get hold of them.
It's not his job to get hold of them - it's his job to provide the police with the names of the people who could have been driving at the time.

Anyway, if what you say is true (he didn't send the info in 'cos he couldn't get hold of them), he'd have been charged with 'Failure to Supply', not 'Perverting the Course of Justice', which suggests he knowingly furnished false information.

I suspect there's more to this than you're telling - as shown by the way your story keeps changing.

craigw

12,248 posts

304 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
friend of mine went to jail for 18 months for similar.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

277 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
yamai1 said:
perverting the cause of justice


What justice is that, then?

craigw

12,248 posts

304 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
I think he means "course"

chrisgr31

14,199 posts

277 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
Looks to me as though someone here has not got their facts straight. My understanding is that tghe registered keeper of the vehicle gets a NIP asking them to name the driver. They complete it and send it off. The scamera partnership then serve a NIP on the driver assumming it wasn't the registered keeper.

Therefore in order ot be done for perverting the course of justice one would have to lie on the form and complete the details incorrectly. Not only that but it would have to be done knowingly.

This is totally different to attempting to use loopholes by not signing the form etc.

The "friend" has nothing to fear if the people named were driving, but if they don't exist, or were named just because they are uncontactable then he is a lot of trouble.

My brother lives in the UAE, its possible that if he returned to the UK on Holiday he could borrow my ticket and get flashed. I could name him as the driver, but at least I and the scamera partnership can contact him to confirm he was driving!

yamai1

Original Poster:

15 posts

264 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
what would happen in both cases if he was to plead guilty and not guilty? i think he wants to plead guilty as he just doesnt want the hassel.what are the ramafecations for doing so? initially, he did say that he would forfit the fines and points onto his licence if the police were not able to trace the people that were driving.

anonymous-user

76 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
You say your mate has "nominated" some people who live abroad so we can assume that he has made it all up? Presumably the Police must have some evidence that he is telling porkies (the photos perhaps?). I would suggest that he doesn't want to compound the situation by getting done for perjury as well.

Best advice, as stated above, is to get a solicitor.

jeffreyarcher

675 posts

270 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
unrepentant said:

Best advice, as stated above, is to get a solicitor.

Best advice is to tell people whose help he wants the truth. If he lies to his solicitor as much as he has lied to us, he won't be able to help him either.