Discussion
how much does this make your blood boil....
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/721525/PLAN-T...
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/721525/PLAN-T...
Edited by Mclovin on Sunday 7th February 15:59
Mclovin said:
how much does this make your blood boil....
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/721525/PLAN-T...
It doesn't.http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/721525/PLAN-T...
Edited by Mclovin on Sunday 7th February 15:59
Forgeting the National pride aspect of this for a moment, I thought Brown was hell bent on saving the planet & that was the reason I get taxed to s
t for daring to drive a car (or three). Now he wants to cash in on this: "...as it anticipates a doubling in freight traffic by 2040".
So shipping tonnes & tonnes of tat all round the globe is ok then Winky? I'll bare that in mind when I'm driving 5 miles less this week.
t for daring to drive a car (or three). Now he wants to cash in on this: "...as it anticipates a doubling in freight traffic by 2040".So shipping tonnes & tonnes of tat all round the globe is ok then Winky? I'll bare that in mind when I'm driving 5 miles less this week.
Mclovin said:
how much does this make your blood boil....
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/721525/PLAN-T...
Why should it?http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/721525/PLAN-T...
Edited by Mclovin on Sunday 7th February 15:59
It's not like they can pack it up, take it away and instal it somewhere else (like Cherbourg, fopr example).
Nero601 said:
elster said:
It is the port, not the cliffs?
Also it is the business, not the land.
and that makes it acceptable then ?Also it is the business, not the land.
Edited by Blue Meanie on Sunday 7th February 16:57
Blue Meanie said:
Nero601 said:
elster said:
It is the port, not the cliffs?
Also it is the business, not the land.
and that makes it acceptable then ?Also it is the business, not the land.
Edited by Blue Meanie on Sunday 7th February 16:57
yes i own an alfa , but (and it is a big but) if a british or foreign manufacturer that makes cars in this country could offer me something as interesting and rewarding to drive that was within my budget i would drive it.
lets just hope winky is ousted before this goes ahead
Nero601 said:
Blue Meanie said:
Nero601 said:
elster said:
It is the port, not the cliffs?
Also it is the business, not the land.
and that makes it acceptable then ?Also it is the business, not the land.
Edited by Blue Meanie on Sunday 7th February 16:57
yes i own an alfa , but (and it is a big but) if a british or foreign manufacturer that makes cars in this country could offer me something as interesting and rewarding to drive that was within my budget i would drive it.
lets just hope winky is ousted before this goes ahead
I don't see why the government need to own companies.
elster said:
Nero601 said:
Blue Meanie said:
Nero601 said:
elster said:
It is the port, not the cliffs?
Also it is the business, not the land.
and that makes it acceptable then ?Also it is the business, not the land.
Edited by Blue Meanie on Sunday 7th February 16:57
yes i own an alfa , but (and it is a big but) if a british or foreign manufacturer that makes cars in this country could offer me something as interesting and rewarding to drive that was within my budget i would drive it.
lets just hope winky is ousted before this goes ahead
I don't see why the government need to own companies.
t , it depends what companies the government own , i still think that utility companies should not be in private hands and especially not foreign ones ie: EDF et alNero601 said:
elster said:
Nero601 said:
Blue Meanie said:
Nero601 said:
elster said:
It is the port, not the cliffs?
Also it is the business, not the land.
and that makes it acceptable then ?Also it is the business, not the land.
Edited by Blue Meanie on Sunday 7th February 16:57
yes i own an alfa , but (and it is a big but) if a british or foreign manufacturer that makes cars in this country could offer me something as interesting and rewarding to drive that was within my budget i would drive it.
lets just hope winky is ousted before this goes ahead
I don't see why the government need to own companies.
t , it depends what companies the government own , i still think that utility companies should not be in private hands and especially not foreign ones ie: EDF et alelster said:
Nero601 said:
Blue Meanie said:
Nero601 said:
elster said:
It is the port, not the cliffs?
Also it is the business, not the land.
and that makes it acceptable then ?Also it is the business, not the land.
Edited by Blue Meanie on Sunday 7th February 16:57
yes i own an alfa , but (and it is a big but) if a british or foreign manufacturer that makes cars in this country could offer me something as interesting and rewarding to drive that was within my budget i would drive it.
lets just hope winky is ousted before this goes ahead
I don't see why the government need to own companies.
Mojocvh said:
elster said:
Nero601 said:
Blue Meanie said:
Nero601 said:
elster said:
It is the port, not the cliffs?
Also it is the business, not the land.
and that makes it acceptable then ?Also it is the business, not the land.
Edited by Blue Meanie on Sunday 7th February 16:57
yes i own an alfa , but (and it is a big but) if a british or foreign manufacturer that makes cars in this country could offer me something as interesting and rewarding to drive that was within my budget i would drive it.
lets just hope winky is ousted before this goes ahead
I don't see why the government need to own companies.
But the Romans built the first harbour.
So I guess the Italians are the nearest modern relative. So the Italians should own it...right?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





