Binyam Mohamed - Milliband aware of his torture?
Binyam Mohamed - Milliband aware of his torture?
Author
Discussion

Sway

Original Poster:

35,295 posts

224 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-i...

Seems that despite assertions to the contrary, judges have ruled that British Intelligence Services were well aware of Binyam Mohamed's treatment in a couple of the American's 'black' prisons, such as Guantanamo....

Taking this as fact (and indeed, a judge's ruling should IMO be taken as such unless evidence is available strongly disputing it), would it therefore be likely that Millipede was equally aware?

Seems that like the Yank's use of hidden prisons, our Government is just as happy to break signed conventions ruling out certain practices in the dubious aim of 'fighting terror'.

Wonder if this sort of thing was needed in the bad ol' days of the IRA?

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

234 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
Could be worse

It could of been mandy who would be wanting to watch

FarleyRusk

1,036 posts

241 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
Is this the guy who isn't even a British citizen? To be honest I don't think that any of the gitmo detainees will auditioning for the role of islam's mahatma ghandi anytime soon so I really don't give a fk about his rights.

ErnestM

11,621 posts

297 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
Hold on just a second...

the telegraph said:
Mr Mohamed was deprived of sleep, "shackled" during interrogation and threatened with the idea that he might "disappear"
This is torture? No car batteries hooked up to electrodes. Bamboo under the fingenails. Not even a waterboarding or two.

Just pointing this out...

...do carry on.

Edited by ErnestM on Wednesday 10th February 19:47

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

261 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
ErnestM said:
Hold on just a second...

the telegraph said:
Mr Mohamed was deprived of sleep, "shackled" during interrogation and threatened with the idea that he might "disappear"
This is torture? No car batteries hooked up to electrodes. Bamboo under the fingenails. Not even a waterboarding or two.

Just pointing this out...

...do carry on.

Edited by ErnestM on Wednesday 10th February 19:47
But Ernest, the "hidden prison" doesn't have a PS2 game in every cell....the savages! hehe

Sway

Original Poster:

35,295 posts

224 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
ErnestM said:
Hold on just a second...

the telegraph said:
Mr Mohamed was deprived of sleep, "shackled" during interrogation and threatened with the idea that he might "disappear"
This is torture? No car batteries hooked up to electrodes. Bamboo under the fingenails. Not even a waterboarding or two.

Just pointing this out...

...do carry on.

Edited by ErnestM on Wednesday 10th February 19:47
But Ernest, the "hidden prison" doesn't have a PS2 game in every cell....the savages! hehe
Fair play guys, I am just a Yank hating Limey socialist!

Actually, I'm more concerned by the seemingly recent, both sides of the pond, feeling by Governments that imprisonment without trial, involving actions that I believe both our historical leaders swore never to use, is deemed to be an acceptable way to combat terrorism.

Imvho, if this is true, we've lost the 'war' already.

I am all for strict punitive measures against those who are found, by decision of a jury of peers, to be guilty of crime.

I am also all for a considered approach to punishment and rehabilitation as applicable to the criminal and the offences commited.

But even such clearly mild treatment should be based on a full and complete case, open to review by the public at large.

After all, he's been released, hasn't he? Kinda implies that he wasn't guilty....

ErnestM

11,621 posts

297 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
Sway said:
Fair play guys, I am just a Yank hating Limey socialist!

Actually, I'm more concerned by the seemingly recent, both sides of the pond, feeling by Governments that imprisonment without trial, involving actions that I believe both our historical leaders swore never to use, is deemed to be an acceptable way to combat terrorism.

Imvho, if this is true, we've lost the 'war' already.

I am all for strict punitive measures against those who are found, by decision of a jury of peers, to be guilty of crime.

I am also all for a considered approach to punishment and rehabilitation as applicable to the criminal and the offences commited.

But even such clearly mild treatment should be based on a full and complete case, open to review by the public at large.

After all, he's been released, hasn't he? Kinda implies that he wasn't guilty....
Never said you were a socialist.

However, I disagree that this is a law enforcement problem. It isn't. These are not yobs knocking over a fast food joint. These are non-regular combatants attempting to engage our militaries and attempting to bring as much destruction as possible to countries that they have "declared war" on.

We should not be attempting to "rehabilitate" them or seek a judicial remedy to this situation. There is none. The jurisdictional venue arguments alone would be epic.

It is war.

Rule 303 applies.

singlecoil

35,834 posts

276 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
ErnestM said:
It is war.

yes

loafer123

16,745 posts

245 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
FarleyRusk said:
Is this the guy who isn't even a British citizen? To be honest I don't think that any of the gitmo detainees will auditioning for the role of islam's mahatma ghandi anytime soon so I really don't give a fk about his rights.
Absolutely right.

There should be a common sense check on stuff like this.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

261 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
ErnestM said:
Sway said:
Fair play guys, I am just a Yank hating Limey socialist!

Actually, I'm more concerned by the seemingly recent, both sides of the pond, feeling by Governments that imprisonment without trial, involving actions that I believe both our historical leaders swore never to use, is deemed to be an acceptable way to combat terrorism.

Imvho, if this is true, we've lost the 'war' already.

I am all for strict punitive measures against those who are found, by decision of a jury of peers, to be guilty of crime.

I am also all for a considered approach to punishment and rehabilitation as applicable to the criminal and the offences commited.

But even such clearly mild treatment should be based on a full and complete case, open to review by the public at large.

After all, he's been released, hasn't he? Kinda implies that he wasn't guilty....
Never said you were a socialist.

However, I disagree that this is a law enforcement problem. It isn't. These are not yobs knocking over a fast food joint. These are non-regular combatants attempting to engage our militaries and attempting to bring as much destruction as possible to countries that they have "declared war" on.

We should not be attempting to "rehabilitate" them or seek a judicial remedy to this situation. There is none. The jurisdictional venue arguments alone would be epic.

It is war.

Rule 303 applies.
+1 yes

968

12,439 posts

278 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
ErnestM said:
Hold on just a second...

the telegraph said:
Mr Mohamed was deprived of sleep, "shackled" during interrogation and threatened with the idea that he might "disappear"
This is torture? No car batteries hooked up to electrodes. Bamboo under the fingenails. Not even a waterboarding or two.

Just pointing this out...

...do carry on.

Edited by ErnestM on Wednesday 10th February 19:47
Amongst other things, he was mutilated with scalpels and beaten repeatedly.

hairykrishna

14,527 posts

233 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
ErnestM said:
However, I disagree that this is a law enforcement problem. It isn't. These are not yobs knocking over a fast food joint. These are non-regular combatants attempting to engage our militaries and attempting to bring as much destruction as possible to countries that they have "declared war" on.
Is he? Why has he been let go then?

ewenm

28,506 posts

275 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
ErnestM said:
It is war.

yes
Doesn't the Geneva Convention rule out torture of PoWs?

Either it is war and torture is illegal under the GC or it's not and you need to use the judicial processes. You can't (or shouldn't) have some sort of halfway house. Remember we're meant to be the good guys, meant to have a moral superiority over the enemy...

Of course, then there needs to be a definition of what is torture.

Edited by ewenm on Wednesday 10th February 22:31

BrassMan

1,501 posts

219 months

Wednesday 10th February 2010
quotequote all
FarleyRusk said:
Is this the guy who isn't even a British citizen? To be honest I don't think that any of the gitmo detainees will auditioning for the role of islam's mahatma ghandi anytime soon so I really don't give a fk about his rights.
Rights have to be universal, else one day it will be you.

Sway said:
Wonder if this sort of thing was needed in the bad ol' days of the IRA?[quote]

The act they are quoting on the news is from 1972. Apparently this is when Heath backed down on torture in NI, specifically stress positions and sleep deprivation.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

261 months

Thursday 11th February 2010
quotequote all
968 said:
ErnestM said:
Hold on just a second...

the telegraph said:
Mr Mohamed was deprived of sleep, "shackled" during interrogation and threatened with the idea that he might "disappear"
This is torture? No car batteries hooked up to electrodes. Bamboo under the fingenails. Not even a waterboarding or two.

Just pointing this out...

...do carry on.

Edited by ErnestM on Wednesday 10th February 19:47
Amongst other things, he was mutilated with scalpels and beaten repeatedly.
Really? May I ask how you know that?

scorp

8,783 posts

259 months

Thursday 11th February 2010
quotequote all
ewenm said:
Doesn't the Geneva Convention rule out torture of PoWs?

Either it is war and torture is illegal under the GC or it's not and you need to use the judicial processes. You can't (or shouldn't) have some sort of halfway house. Remember we're meant to be the good guys, meant to have a moral superiority over the enemy...

Of course, then there needs to be a definition of what is torture.

Edited by ewenm on Wednesday 10th February 22:31
It was never black white, what about spies ? They were traditionally executed when caught and are considered neither POW nor non-POW.


Edited by scorp on Thursday 11th February 00:56

andy_s

19,856 posts

289 months

Thursday 11th February 2010
quotequote all
Not proper torture though was it, you know, a rack, the two man saw, iron maiden, the saddle, branding. Ah, that was the day.

collateral

7,238 posts

248 months

Thursday 11th February 2010
quotequote all
I find the fact that western governments have been complicit in torture and then did everything in their power to avoid the facts coming out absolutely abhorrent.

Winning the war on terror, one terrorised prisoner at a time!

fking hell

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

234 months

Thursday 11th February 2010
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
ErnestM said:
It is war.

yes
Yeah were both sides are struggling to remove our freedoms

Vipers

33,514 posts

258 months

Thursday 11th February 2010
quotequote all
FarleyRusk said:
Is this the guy who isn't even a British citizen? To be honest I don't think that any of the gitmo detainees will auditioning for the role of islam's mahatma ghandi anytime soon so I really don't give a fk about his rights.
Well you might if you had been one of the innocent detainees over there. But they are good at rounding up good guys, all the Japenese living in the states during the war.

But one has to wonder why most of the world dont exactly like the americans......


smile