Challenger: A Harrowing Tale
Challenger: A Harrowing Tale
Author
Discussion

evenflow

Original Poster:

8,838 posts

304 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
I've just read this article about the Challenger shuttle disaster (1986?).

It makes very harrowing reading indeed. Those poor crew members.

Sit at your desk now and see how long 2 minutes 45 seconds is. A long time just to sit there. Now imagine how long it felt for them.

soad

34,283 posts

198 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
Remember seeing it on the news (back then). frown

Article said: "They were alive all the way down." yikes


Don

28,378 posts

306 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
cry

Melchett

817 posts

208 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
Brave prople!

This is one of my earliest memories. The christmas before, I got and Airfix kit of the shuttle, you had different decals to call it what you wanted, Discovery, Enterprise etc. I called it Challenger. I also went to see the Captians grave in Arlington.

southendpier

6,002 posts

251 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
soad said:
Remember seeing it on the news (back then). frown

Article said: "They were alive all the way down." yikes
But not conscious.

I think evidence was found that three had turned on their evac air designed to get them out of the shuttle on a on ground launch pad emergency. General view is they were unconcious. I beleive.

The pressures invoved on the craft at break up were astonishing, unlikely anyone would survived/remainded conscious the deceleration.

Caruso

7,503 posts

278 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
Several locked switches on the flight deck had been moved which showed that at least one of the pilots was still concious and attmepting to work the loss of power problem they experienced.

Lurking Lawyer

4,535 posts

247 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
southendpier said:
General view is they were unconcious. I beleive.

The pressures invoved on the craft at break up were astonishing, unlikely anyone would survived/remainded conscious the deceleration.
That's not what the quoted article says - the gist being that the explosion, whilst being strong enough to separate the crew section, wasn't powerful enough to injure the crew.

The orbiter exploded at around 48,000 ft but the crew compartment was carried upwards through its momentum to around 65,000 ft before it then fell ballistically back to the ground.

The article acknowledges that no-one knows for certain but says that the G forces experienced wouldn't have been so overwhelming as to push the astronauts into unconsciousness - and in any event, at least one of them (the mission commander) was a very experienced military test pilot was who very well used to enduing excessive Gs without passing out.

There's a very real possibility that some or all of them were conscious for a good part, if not all, of the 2 mins 45 it took to hit the ocean frown

Matt Evans

1,530 posts

196 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
southendpier said:
But not conscious.

I think evidence was found that three had turned on their evac air designed to get them out of the shuttle on a on ground launch pad emergency. General view is they were unconcious. I beleive.

The pressures invoved on the craft at break up were astonishing, unlikely anyone would survived/remainded conscious the deceleration.
Not according to that article.

article said:
Mercifully unconscious?
But even if the crew cabin had survived intact, wouldn’t the violent pitching and yawing of the cabin as it descended toward the ocean created G-forces so strong as to render the astronauts unconscious?

That may have once been believed. But that was before the investigation turned up the key piece of evidence that led to the inescapable conclusion that they were alive: On the trip down, the commander and pilot’s reserved oxygen packs had been turned on by astronaut Judy Resnik, seated directly behind them. Furthermore, the pictures, which showed the cabin riding its own velocity in a ballistic arc, did not support an erratic, spinning motion. And even if there were G-forces, commander Dick Scobee was an experienced test pilot, habituated to them.

The evidence led experts to conclude the seven astronauts lived. They worked frantically to save themselves through the plummeting arc that would take them 2 minutes and 45 seconds to smash into the ocean.

That is when they died — after an eternity of descent.

Dan_1981

17,929 posts

221 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
Horrible tale.


And when i read the report that was linked i thought it was trashy rubbishy reporting as well.

But I read this page...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3078069/ns/technology_...

Which describe the take off of the shuttle and I think its brilliant journalism.

The Hypno-Toad

13,077 posts

227 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
I remember even at the time (and obviously this was long before the rumour mill that is the internet) there stories that there was a very harrowing "secret" tape of cockpit communications as they fell to earth.

Poor guys.

Munter

31,330 posts

263 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
Bad as it was. This kind of "I know I'm going to die, in the very near future" situation happens quite a bit.

Truly horrible way to go. Sadly not unusual in disasters big, and small.

djmck30

258 posts

208 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
Matt Evans said:
southendpier said:
But not conscious.

I think evidence was found that three had turned on their evac air designed to get them out of the shuttle on a on ground launch pad emergency. General view is they were unconcious. I beleive.

The pressures invoved on the craft at break up were astonishing, unlikely anyone would survived/remainded conscious the deceleration.
Not according to that article.

article said:
Mercifully unconscious?
But even if the crew cabin had survived intact, wouldn’t the violent pitching and yawing of the cabin as it descended toward the ocean created G-forces so strong as to render the astronauts unconscious?

That may have once been believed. But that was before the investigation turned up the key piece of evidence that led to the inescapable conclusion that they were alive: On the trip down, the commander and pilot’s reserved oxygen packs had been turned on by astronaut Judy Resnik, seated directly behind them. Furthermore, the pictures, which showed the cabin riding its own velocity in a ballistic arc, did not support an erratic, spinning motion. And even if there were G-forces, commander Dick Scobee was an experienced test pilot, habituated to them.

The evidence led experts to conclude the seven astronauts lived. They worked frantically to save themselves through the plummeting arc that would take them 2 minutes and 45 seconds to smash into the ocean.

That is when they died — after an eternity of descent.
The g-forces weren't the issue, it was whether or not the crew cabin became depressurised due to the breakup of the orbiter. If they lost pressure then even the emergency o2 equipment wouldn't have kept them consious for more than a few tens of seconds - but enough time to punch a few switches. It's never been conclusively proven either way. Wiki article has a pretty balanced view.

Still a pretty harrowing story, including all the background to how a completley preventable disaster could have happened in the first place. This (together with Chernobyl and the Herald of Free Enterprise) is one of my earliest real memories of a 'big' news event unfolding, I was six at the time.

YAD061

39,731 posts

306 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
At this stage they would be suited up but on external supplies? if they managed to switch to internal O2 they should be ok atmosphere wise I'd have thought

Quaint

658 posts

216 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
I don't think the crew would have been wearing pressure suits. IIRC they did for the first launch, as a safety precaution, but moved shortly thereafter to flying in normal coveralls and bone-domes.

YAD061

39,731 posts

306 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
Duh....of course they didn't, it says so in the first paragraph. In that case and presuming the integrity of the pressure cabin was lost, the loss of pressurisation would be their first hurdle

Lost soul

8,712 posts

204 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
There is a little shown news clip of the Israeli guy sitting by a window , you can clearly see damage to the wing

Dan_1981

17,929 posts

221 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
Lost soul said:
There is a little shown news clip of the Israeli guy sitting by a window , you can clearly see damage to the wing
I doubt it....

There was no damage to the wing prior to take off? (not to mention this accident not being caused by any damage to a wing??)

and as far as i'm aware there were no Isralies (sp) onboard???




Lost soul

8,712 posts

204 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
Dan_1981 said:
Lost soul said:
There is a little shown news clip of the Israeli guy sitting by a window , you can clearly see damage to the wing
I doubt it....

There was no damage to the wing prior to take off? (not to mention this accident not being caused by any damage to a wing??)

and as far as i'm aware there were no Isralies (sp) onboard???
Hold on are we talking about the shuttle that burnt up on re entry ?

evenflow

Original Poster:

8,838 posts

304 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
Lost soul said:
There is a little shown news clip of the Israeli guy sitting by a window , you can clearly see damage to the wing
Are you thinking about the one that disintegrated over Texas on re-entry?

Lost soul

8,712 posts

204 months

Friday 12th February 2010
quotequote all
evenflow said:
Lost soul said:
There is a little shown news clip of the Israeli guy sitting by a window , you can clearly see damage to the wing
Are you thinking about the one that disintegrated over Texas on re-entry?
:facepalm:

yes sorry my misstake