New Lens then! - (Nikon)
Author
Discussion

beano500

Original Poster:

20,854 posts

297 months

Saturday 13th February 2010
quotequote all
Ah-ha!

The spiritual successor to the legendary (although perhaps somewhat over rated) 28mm f/1.4 is here at last.

http://www.nikon.com/about/news/2010/0209_24mmf1.4...

I could - of course - trade in my little old 35mm f/2 - which is good, but not brilliant.

The I will have the "three kings" including the 50mm and 85mm




...except for the slight flaw in my cunning plan! The price tag - just short of £2k RRP - are they serious!?


SamHH

5,065 posts

238 months

Saturday 13th February 2010
quotequote all
They never sell for RRP after the initial rush of demand though do they? For example, looking on Canon's website, their version's RRP is £2k but it sells for £1350ish. Still bloody expensive though.

AndWhyNot

2,358 posts

221 months

Saturday 13th February 2010
quotequote all
beano500 said:
Ah-ha!

The spiritual successor to the legendary (although perhaps somewhat over rated) 28mm f/1.4 is here at last.

http://www.nikon.com/about/news/2010/0209_24mmf1.4...

I could - of course - trade in my little old 35mm f/2 - which is good, but not brilliant.

The I will have the "three kings" including the 50mm and 85mm




...except for the slight flaw in my cunning plan! The price tag - just short of £2k RRP - are they serious!?

Ridiculous money against the 50mm f/1.4

My 35mm f/2 is my new fave lens, not getting on with my 50mm f/1.4 G yet

Simpo Two

90,919 posts

287 months

Saturday 13th February 2010
quotequote all
beano500 said:
...except for the slight flaw in my cunning plan! The price tag - just short of £2k RRP - are they serious!?
Simpo says: crank up the ISO, blur the bd in PS and save the loot biggrin

Muska

1,138 posts

204 months

Saturday 13th February 2010
quotequote all
I would have paid £1400 for the 24mm f1.4 but not nearly £2k, no chance. For that I could but a 135mm F2 DC, 85mm f1.4 & 35mm f2 just about.

Same goes for the 16-35mm, It's a lens that would be useful to me as i'm after something wider than 24mm and I never require anything below f4 at that focal length so it would have been perfect at approx £850ish.

I'll buy neither now. We're getting a really raw deal here in the UK. I may save and go to America to purchase instead. I'd still have change from the flights!

Bitter, me?!

SamHH

5,065 posts

238 months

Saturday 13th February 2010
quotequote all
Muska said:
I would have paid £1400 for the 24mm f1.4 but not nearly £2k, no chance. For that I could but a 135mm F2 DC, 85mm f1.4 & 35mm f2 just about.

Same goes for the 16-35mm, It's a lens that would be useful to me as i'm after something wider than 24mm and I never require anything below f4 at that focal length so it would have been perfect at approx £850ish.

I'll buy neither now. We're getting a really raw deal here in the UK. I may save and go to America to purchase instead. I'd still have change from the flights!

Bitter, me?!
As I mentioned above they'll come down from RRP after a few months. Just look at the RRP of any other lens, then look how much it actually costs in a shop.

Edited by SamHH on Saturday 13th February 18:31

Major Bloodnok

1,561 posts

237 months

Saturday 13th February 2010
quotequote all
Plus, it's a 'G' lens, so no aperture ring. Useless on an F90X. Two reasons not to bother.

carlosfandango

92 posts

263 months

Sunday 14th February 2010
quotequote all
Muska said:
I'll buy neither now. We're getting a really raw deal here in the UK. I may save and go to America to purchase instead. I'd still have change from the flights!

Bitter, me?!
I'd check carefully first... I bought the Nikon 18-200mm VRII in the states a while back, only saved £20 on a £500 lens and lost the UK warranty in the process. I didn't pay over the odds either.

Muska

1,138 posts

204 months

Sunday 14th February 2010
quotequote all
Thanks, if I purchased on release I'd save £600 on the 24mm alone! I don't worry much about the warrenty, I have a friendly Nikon technition I can call on.

I feel for canon users also, their new 70-200 f2.8 IS is £2700! I know what the poster above means about rrp but ours in the UK is still a raw deal. It will take some time for the 24mm to reduce by £600. The only reason the 70-200 came down about £400 so fast was because of the Internet hype of a non issue.

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

225 months

Sunday 14th February 2010
quotequote all
Muska said:
I feel for canon users also, their new 70-200 f2.8 IS is £2700!
'Fraid the new Canon 70-200 mk2 is a similar price :/

Muska

1,138 posts

204 months

Sunday 14th February 2010
quotequote all
That's the one I was on about. Nikons is, amazingly, £1000 cheaper.

Although I'm not sure if it suffers from focal breathing like the nikon.

Edited by Muska on Sunday 14th February 21:58

Simpo Two

90,919 posts

287 months

Sunday 14th February 2010
quotequote all
Muska said:
Although I'm not sure if it suffers from focal breathing like the nikon.
There's a word for when the zoom and the focus are independent but I can't remember it...




ETA: Elderly will probably know wink

Edited by Simpo Two on Monday 15th February 09:42