Over 50s hold all the wealth
Discussion
groucho said:
All over the news today, some Tory has brought out a book stating that the over 50s are responsible for CC, and have all the wealth and benefitted from cheap houses. His answer? Give it back to the young people.
Did it not occur to him that older people have had longer to save?
ahhh lovely, the redistribution of wealth chestnut Did it not occur to him that older people have had longer to save?

The guy probably has a point, jobs where more secure and house prices lower. My Parents moved to a nice house in a commuter village (30 years ago) at the same age I am now, ok my dad was a chartered accountant but on one wage provided a very good standard of living, to get the same standard of living and a similar house I would have to earn probably 1.5 to twice his wage. My wife's parents are similar in having bought a very nice house etc.
So, what does this Tory propose? A new death tax?
If he's into a meritocracy, perhaps he would be better suited to the Lib Dems, who seem to be the closest thing to having a combination of "state interference" (death tax) and liberal "rise to the top".
Labour'll have your money and try and stop you getting to the top!
Doesn't sound very Tory to me.
If he's into a meritocracy, perhaps he would be better suited to the Lib Dems, who seem to be the closest thing to having a combination of "state interference" (death tax) and liberal "rise to the top".
Labour'll have your money and try and stop you getting to the top!
Doesn't sound very Tory to me.
Dr.Doofenshmirtz said:
b
ks.
My Dad worked damn hard to pay off his £3'500 mortgage (only breadwinner back then of course)...lot of money in those days.
Why the f
k should my parents help todays idiots who wanted it all but coulden't afford it?
Do you happen to know what your fathers avergae income was when he was paying back his £3,500 mortgage? I know that interest rates made a huge difference, but i tstill think it must have been easier to pay off a mortgage forty years ago, than it is today.
ks.My Dad worked damn hard to pay off his £3'500 mortgage (only breadwinner back then of course)...lot of money in those days.
Why the f
k should my parents help todays idiots who wanted it all but coulden't afford it? Both my parents (divorced in the 70's) benefitted from very cheap houses. One bought a council house for peanuts (a tenth of it's value) and the other one bought the house their parents had rented for years, and got that for about a 15th of it's value!
They were both mortgage free in their 50's and both have very good pensions.
b
ds 
Dr.Doofenshmirtz said:
b
ks.
My Dad worked damn hard to pay off his £3'500 mortgage (only breadwinner back then of course)...lot of money in those days.
Why the f
k should my parents help todays idiots who wanted it all but coulden't afford it?
My dad did the same, paid it off early as the only real wage earner (as a drayman), while mum did some part time work in between raising four kids. They bought a three bed semi in the early 70's for £7k, extended it to four beds and paid off the mortgage within 15yrs.
ks.My Dad worked damn hard to pay off his £3'500 mortgage (only breadwinner back then of course)...lot of money in those days.
Why the f
k should my parents help todays idiots who wanted it all but coulden't afford it? Fast forward to 2005, they sell the house to me and my now wife for £120k (£40k below market value), and although we are both working full time in reasonable jobs (her paramedic, me struct engineer) we had to take out a 30yr mortgage and are only just starting to be able to think about overpaying on it. Thats without any kids yet.
I'm not saying life was easy for my parents, but money certainly went a lot further back then. We don't splash the cash on crap we can't afford because we don't have much left over to splash with.
There speaketh a man who has nothing to inherit.
My folks worked f
king hard for their large nice house, they used to drive s
t cars and scraped and scratched, grew their own food, didn't have the latest stuff and now they've finally got there and have some money to spare following getting taxed all along the way, they have some socialist prick suggesting that the state has it to redistribute. (Which I imagine would be his conclusion).
When are they going to learn that this is the consequence of overpopulation and mechanisation?
What a knob!
My folks worked f
king hard for their large nice house, they used to drive s
t cars and scraped and scratched, grew their own food, didn't have the latest stuff and now they've finally got there and have some money to spare following getting taxed all along the way, they have some socialist prick suggesting that the state has it to redistribute. (Which I imagine would be his conclusion). When are they going to learn that this is the consequence of overpopulation and mechanisation?
What a knob!
Having not read the book I don't know which points he raises, or what he is suggesting as a cure.
But, the Welfare State's unfunded pensions was a big "f
k You" from the post war generation to their own grandchildren. And we used to have a tax situation that favoured stable families that we now cannot afford. Not that the socialists would want them. So, he is right to some degree.
But, the Welfare State's unfunded pensions was a big "f
k You" from the post war generation to their own grandchildren. And we used to have a tax situation that favoured stable families that we now cannot afford. Not that the socialists would want them. So, he is right to some degree.Tangent Police said:
There speaketh a man who has nothing to inherit.
My folks worked f
king hard for their large nice house, they used to drive s
t cars and scraped and scratched, grew their own food, didn't have the latest stuff and now they've finally got there and have some money to spare following getting taxed all along the way, they have some socialist prick suggesting that the state has it to redistribute. (Which I imagine would be his conclusion).
When are they going to learn that this is the consequence of overpopulation and mechanisation?
What a knob!
Blimey, I didn't know that Tom and Barbara Good had any kids!My folks worked f
king hard for their large nice house, they used to drive s
t cars and scraped and scratched, grew their own food, didn't have the latest stuff and now they've finally got there and have some money to spare following getting taxed all along the way, they have some socialist prick suggesting that the state has it to redistribute. (Which I imagine would be his conclusion). When are they going to learn that this is the consequence of overpopulation and mechanisation?
What a knob!
groucho said:
All over the news today, some Tory has brought out a book stating that the over 50s are responsible for CC, and have all the wealth and benefitted from cheap houses. His answer? Give it back to the young people.
Did it not occur to him that older people have had longer to save?
Sure he's a Tory? Did it not occur to him that older people have had longer to save?
I think there's a reasonable argument that the 'baby boomer' generation have had an easier life overall than any previous or subsequent generation has yet managed. And having established themselves in positions of power, it can certainly seem at times like some of this generation have acted to preserve their own good fortune at the expense of those younger than themselves. So I'll be honest and say that yes, it does make me sick when the likes of Lord Browne start lecturing young people about 'not worrying' about all the debt they are accruing from university tuition when he sailed through the whole system for gratis.
And whilst I know that there are plenty of people in that generation who have worked hard, behaved responsibly and built up their wealth by making sacrifices early on that today's youngsters wouldn't countenance, it still rankles a bit when they refuse to recognise at least some of their good fortune. Does it rankle enough to make me support some kind of wealth-redistribution nonsense? Probably not. Especially as it would undoubtedly go straight to the feckless youth and miss out all us Gen-Xers who are the ones doing all the real work in this country.
It's probably best to ignore me anyway. I'm just riding the generational-angst wave as a result of working with a bunch of lazy, incompetent, selfish 50-somethings who all seem to be happily winding down to retirement at 60 on a generous pension and letting everyone else take up the slack, whilst I'm simultaneous expected to educate a generation of utterly aspirationless, ill-disciplined, workshy monkeys whose future impact on our society fills me with dread horror. Ah, sod it. I'm off for a nice cup of tea and a Douglas Coupland book.
And whilst I know that there are plenty of people in that generation who have worked hard, behaved responsibly and built up their wealth by making sacrifices early on that today's youngsters wouldn't countenance, it still rankles a bit when they refuse to recognise at least some of their good fortune. Does it rankle enough to make me support some kind of wealth-redistribution nonsense? Probably not. Especially as it would undoubtedly go straight to the feckless youth and miss out all us Gen-Xers who are the ones doing all the real work in this country.

It's probably best to ignore me anyway. I'm just riding the generational-angst wave as a result of working with a bunch of lazy, incompetent, selfish 50-somethings who all seem to be happily winding down to retirement at 60 on a generous pension and letting everyone else take up the slack, whilst I'm simultaneous expected to educate a generation of utterly aspirationless, ill-disciplined, workshy monkeys whose future impact on our society fills me with dread horror. Ah, sod it. I'm off for a nice cup of tea and a Douglas Coupland book.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



