Starbucks to be sued by customer...
Starbucks to be sued by customer...
Author
Discussion

TheCarpetCleaner

Original Poster:

7,294 posts

223 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1252283/Fa...

While I agree a public place has some duty of care over the customers, I really don't see how they can always take 100% responsibility over every single aspect.

When out in public, you need to be vigilant.


What gets me is...

"'This is not about compensation, this is about preventing such a thing happening to another family.'"

So why are you suing them then? Make it public, bring it to the press, hell - go on TV if possible, but how will suing them prevent such a thing from taking place again?


Puggit

49,394 posts

269 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
One look at the grandmother says enough

mikestrat

2,834 posts

193 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Feck me they are an ugly pair!

TheCarpetCleaner

Original Poster:

7,294 posts

223 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
hehe

Trust PH to get to the core of the issue!

ChrisMCoupe

927 posts

233 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Does the Grandmother have some kind of knuckle duster on or is that really a ring on every single finger!

Compensation hungry pikies, case closed.

grumbledoak

32,320 posts

254 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
ChrisMCoupe said:
Compensation hungry pikies, case closed.
Word.

Uriel

3,244 posts

272 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
I can understand a toddler picking up a syringe and stabbing themselves, but how does the mother then manage to 'prick' themselves with it too?

Bufoons.

andy400

11,146 posts

252 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
The only viable reason for suing Starbucks would be that they sell incredibly st 'coffee' at massively inflated prices.

bonsai

2,015 posts

201 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
I'm not sure about this one.

Out of all the compensation claims the papers report on, I think having a junkie's needle prick you in a Starbucks is one of the less ridiculous ones.

Soovy

35,829 posts

292 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all


You just knew what these people would look like before you open the page.

How about WATCHING WHAT YOUR REVOLTING OFFSPRING ARE DOING YOU F CKWITS.


Compensation hungry pikeys.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

226 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Uriel said:
Bufoons.
Yes, quite.

wink

g3org3y

21,973 posts

212 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Starbucks...the usual hangout for junkies, apparently.

article said:
Her grandmother, Linda Shipley, then pricked herself on the hand while trying to release it from the toddler's grasp.
Fail. rolleyes

OnTheOverrun

3,965 posts

198 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
andy400 said:
The only viable reason for suing Starbucks would be that they sell incredibly st 'coffee' at massively inflated prices.
Are you sure they sell coffee? I've only been in one once but gave up trying to work out what you have to say to the robots behind the counter to get a simple cup of coffee and haven't been back since.

Oakey

27,964 posts

237 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
How does a 10month old baby get hold of a syringe? At 10 months old can they even walk yet? If not, it means a 10month old was left crawling about on it's own.

Buzz word

2,028 posts

230 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
As long as starbucks have a policy for thoroughly cleaning the place throughout the day I think they have done all they could. If the needle was dropped 2 days ago and wasn't cleaned up they would have been neglidgent. It could have been dropped seconds before in which case it was impossible to prevent. However, if there is a known problem of junkies shooting things into their veins in the place then I think they have a higher duty of care to make sure there are no needles about or that the junkies arent allowed in.

If they do clean regularly then it would seem to be one of those unfortunace rare situations that seem to present themselves in life.

Soovy

35,829 posts

292 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Oakey said:
How does a 10month old baby get hold of a syringe? At 10 months old can they even walk yet? If not, it means a 10month old was left crawling about on it's own.
bing

andy400

11,146 posts

252 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
OnTheOverrun said:
andy400 said:
The only viable reason for suing Starbucks would be that they sell incredibly st 'coffee' at massively inflated prices.
Are you sure they sell coffee? I've only been in one once but gave up trying to work out what you have to say to the robots behind the counter to get a simple cup of coffee and haven't been back since.
yes Hence the inverted commas.

Nothing sold in those places even closely resembles what I would reasonably call 'coffee'.

louiebaby

10,799 posts

212 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Isn't that a needle? I thought the syringe was the plastic bit with the plunger...

[/pedant]

robm3

4,930 posts

248 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
If only she'd remained a "stay at home mum" and not gone to Starbucks in the first place.


TankRizzo

7,878 posts

214 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Cash-hungry pikeys said:
'This is not about compensation, this is about preventing such a thing happening to another family.'
rofl Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight.