Shooters - chances of FAC approval?
Shooters - chances of FAC approval?
Author
Discussion

wiffmaster

Original Poster:

2,616 posts

222 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Afternoon all,

Fancy getting a .22 rimfire to do some pest control around the farm, so am considering applying for my FAC.

Background:

  • 22 years old (no idea if they consider age when applying?)
  • Already hold SGC
  • 120 acres private land to shoot on. Chalk with no flint so minimal chance of ricochet
  • Crops grown and plenty of rabbits which need controlling
  • One public footpath running through the land (would be shooting a long way from this)
  • Zero convictions (including speeding fines and the like)
  • Hertfordshire Police are my local force
What are my chances of gaining approval? Does anyone have any tips to make the whole process run smoothly?

Any advice much appreciated.

Jezza30

265 posts

203 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Shouldn't be a problem. I shoot over a similar amount of land and have a rimfire, 22-250 and 243, although i think i was a bit lucky to get the last one!
Just be very nice to the FAO on your interview and get some nice biscuits in biggrin Be knowledgable about the land (where footpaths are, where potential backstops are etc...) and know what you want in terms of a rifle.
Oh, and the quality of FAO's between counties varies A LOT!!!
As long as you have land and are a decent, sane bloke, getting a FAC is not as hard as many will make you believe
smile

Edited by Jezza30 on Monday 1st March 18:18

wiffmaster

Original Poster:

2,616 posts

222 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for the info - sounds like it should be possible then.

I've heard it varies a fair bit between forces as to what they will and won't grant. But, I got on well with the chap who conducted the SGC interview/inspection, so with any luck it will be the same chap again when I come to apply for FAC.

One more question if I may - can you add calibres to the certificate retrospectively? I only want/need a .22 for the time being and so that's what I'd apply for. But, could I theoretically add a something like a .243 at a later date if the need arose, or does it all have to be done when the certificate is granted?

Cheers.

Lambochick

1,462 posts

242 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Other calibres can be added retrospectively. Just remember that with a FAC you need to demonstrate a good reason for owning one, and not because it's something you want.


poo at Paul's

14,558 posts

199 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
I'd think referring to them as "shooters" doesn't help your case! Dont mention sawing them off, either.

Emsman

7,210 posts

214 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Can't see amy issue- all of the boxes ticked.

Make sure you get a silencer for your .22 though- far more effective

wiffmaster

Original Poster:

2,616 posts

222 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Lambochick said:
Other calibres can be added retrospectively. Just remember that with a FAC you need to demonstrate a good reason for owning one, and not because it's something you want.
Thanks for the info, good to know they could be added at a later date if needed. I wouldn't want to apply for anything other than a .22 at present, as the only pests which need controlling are rabbits. Hence a .22 rimfire would be sufficient for the time being. However, it's possible this will change at some point - hence my question about adding calibres retrospectively.

poo at Paul's said:
I'd think referring to them as "shooters" doesn't help your case! Dont mention sawing them off, either.
I meant it in the 'people who shoot' sense, not the 'this is my shooter' sense!hehe

Emsman said:
Can't see amy issue- all of the boxes ticked.

Make sure you get a silencer for your .22 though- far more effective
Jolly good. Would definitely go down the silencer route.

Edited by wiffmaster on Tuesday 9th March 21:06

Lefty Two Drams

19,917 posts

226 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Remember that a moderator needs to be stated on the FAC.

Any particular reason you want a .22? I'm a fairly recent convert to .17hmr, it's a superb round and my .22 has barely been touched since getting an hmr.

wiffmaster

Original Poster:

2,616 posts

222 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Lefty Two Drams said:
Remember that a moderator needs to be stated on the FAC.

Any particular reason you want a .22? I'm a fairly recent convert to .17hmr, it's a superb round and my .22 has barely been touched since getting an hmr.
Wasn't aware of the moderator fact - cheers.

I just thought that a .22 rimfire would be the best choice as it is quite quiet, relatively accurate and cheap to run. Most of my shots are likely to be rabbits ~75 yards, so I'm not sure if the extra accuracy/range of a .17hmr is worth the extra noise associated with a .17hrm? I also have decent backstops and chalk ground, so hopefully the richochet potential of .22 is minimised.

Willing to be enlightened/corrected/converted though, if people believe a .17hmr to be the better choice? smile

Emsman

7,210 posts

214 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
I have used both, and although the 17 is a great round, I still prefer the 22 for the lack of noise (with a sub sonic round) and I found 17 to be affected much more by a cross wind.
You could try for both though?

Lefty Two Drams

19,917 posts

226 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Much flatter trajectory than .22, fewer ricochet worries as you've rightly noted but, unfortunately, they're quite a bit more expensive.



wiffmaster

Original Poster:

2,616 posts

222 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Cheers guys. Might apply for both as mentioned, but would probably buy the .22 to start with and then purchase the .17 at a later date. Is .17hmr any less likely to be approved? If I put down both and one is rejected, will I still be granted the other one, or do you have to restart the application process? Thanks for all your help chaps.

Emsman

7,210 posts

214 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
I would apply for a moderated .22 first, and you can add the 17 at a later date.
You can get a good .22 for peanuts, or go mental and spent st loads. A few hundred quid will get you something nice- don't go too mad on scope magnification though- it magnifys wobble as well, I use a 9x and that it more than adequate

anonymous-user

78 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
I would say you have a fairly good chance with the details you have given.
It does vary from county to county though.
I have my SGC and I'm hoping to apply for my FAC over summer for a bit of bunny shooting.

ChunkyloverSV

1,335 posts

216 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Emsman said:
I have used both, and although the 17 is a great round, I still prefer the 22 for the lack of noise (with a sub sonic round) and I found 17 to be affected much more by a cross wind.
You could try for both though?
Who let you anywhere near a gun hehe

jbudgie

9,760 posts

236 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Emsman , You ---have ---a --- gun ?? crycrycry

jbudgie

9,760 posts

236 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Beaten to it mad

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

279 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
RUN AWAY....

Jovial Joe

371 posts

209 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
Easiest way is to first apply for a FAC rated air rifle,get your ticket and then apply for a variation.
Pretty much accepted procedure down here in darkest Glos and have yet to know of anyone that's been refused via this method.
Best regards

Silent1

19,762 posts

259 months

Monday 1st March 2010
quotequote all
As long as you don't get the female FAO you'll be fine.
When she came round last time to sort the paperwork for the .50 she was in complete disagreement with her colleague over what was appropriate use (the bloke agreed with boar, deer and anything of that size) she only agreed with boar!