Katrina victims sue oil companies

[DrTre]

What. The. fk.

?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/globa...

Now, i'm not as rabidly anti MMGW as most on here but this is just fking mental

[kiteless]

And who, exactly, are they going to call for their professional witnesses? Gore? Mann? Jones? Santer?

And, um, what data would they use as substantiation..........

[Monki]

Hopefully they go ahead and MMGW is proven to be the nonsense it really is

[johnfm]

The very definition of vexatious litigation.

[otolith]

Western civilization on the verge of devouring itself - once we can sue each other for the weather, the end is nigh.

[crofty1984]

Monki said:

Hopefully they go ahead and MMGW is proven to be the nonsense it really is

+1

[clarkey318is]

crofty1984 said:

Monki said:

Hopefully they go ahead and MMGW is proven to be the nonsense it really is

+1

+2 The more these idiots try and blame WEATHER on CLIMATE change (Spot the difference) the less credit it has.
I liked it when some Liberal window licker tried to blame the Haiti earthquake on global warming.

[Monki]

They'll be blaming Labour screwing up the economy on climate change soon

[tybo]

crofty1984 said:

Monki said:

Hopefully they go ahead and MMGW is proven to be the nonsense it really is

+1

Let them carry on. The more ridiculous the claims made = more people wake up to the fact it's all bullst.


Hopefully....

[TankRizzo]

TVR Moneypit said:

clarkey318is said:

I liked it when some Liberal window licker tried to blame the Haiti earthquake on global warming.

Dear God. Please tell me you are joking?

Bizarrely, I think it was the actor Danny Glover.

[clarkey318is]

TankRizzo said:

TVR Moneypit said:

clarkey318is said:

I liked it when some Liberal window licker tried to blame the Haiti earthquake on global warming.

Dear God. Please tell me you are joking?

Bizarrely, I think it was the actor Danny Glover.

It was definitely a man. I do not keep up to date with celebrities and as such don't know, but I heard it clear as day.

Edit: Deary me... ://www.linktv.org/about/blog/post/355/danny-glover...

Edited by clarkey318is on Friday 5th March 00:55

Edited by clarkey318is on Friday 5th March 00:56

[rypt]

TankRizzo said:

TVR Moneypit said:

clarkey318is said:

I liked it when some Liberal window licker tried to blame the Haiti earthquake on global warming.

Dear God. Please tell me you are joking?

Bizarrely, I think it was the actor Danny Glover.

He said it was punishment from God due to failure to stop Global Warming, I think

[Monki]

rypt said:

TankRizzo said:

TVR Moneypit said:

clarkey318is said:

I liked it when some Liberal window licker tried to blame the Haiti earthquake on global warming.

Dear God. Please tell me you are joking?

Bizarrely, I think it was the actor Danny Glover.

He said it was punishment from God due to failure to stop Global Warming, I think

And somewhere in the heavens, God is desperately searching for the 'Captain Picard facepalm' pic

[pokethepope]

And none of the plaintiffs have ever driven a car, or bought a TV, or eaten at McDonalds, or flown anywhere?

Thats contributory negligence, at least

[Jasandjules]

Ah that is good. They will be required to evidence their claim. They won't have any proof. Sooo, that'll be a costs application then.....

[andy_s]

It's probably more about shyster lawyers out for a quick-buck class-action rather than having any basis in reality.

Qui bono, not pro bono.

Edited by andy_s on Friday 5th March 08:59

[DrTre]

andy_s said:

Qui bono, not pro bono.

Knew that would be involved somewhere along the line...

[johnfm]

andy_s said:

It's probably more about shyster lawyers out for a quick-buck class-action rather than having any basis in reality.

Qui bono, not pro bono.

Edited by andy_s on Friday 5th March 08:59

Nail. Meet Hammer.

[Tony*T3]

Where there's blame, there's a claim......

[ErnestM]

andy_s said:

It's probably more about shyster lawyers out for a quick-buck class-action rather than having any basis in reality.

Qui bono, not pro bono.

Edited by andy_s on Friday 5th March 08:59

Absolutely. Another good argument for "loser pays".