Tell me about the FTO
Tell me about the FTO
Author
Discussion

dr.pepper

Original Poster:

634 posts

218 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
I heard an FTO zip past me today and it sounded very nice. Naturally this got me curious.

Do the tiptronics zap a lot of power? I've seen the quoted 0-60 as slow as 9.2 seconds in some places and around 8 seconds for the MIVEC. This does seem a little lacklustre in comparison to to other cars in a similair power bracket.

I've been told that the best buy is the Manual GR as it is quicker/cheaper to insure than a Tiptronic Mivec. Is there any truth to this?




dr.pepper

Original Poster:

634 posts

218 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
Oh and another thing, why is it so damn hard to find a good MIVEC? God-damn chavs have spoiled them with bean can exhausts and horrible batman bodykits frown

ex vtskid

347 posts

200 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
Insurance is sky high, especially when you consider the performance. Before I bought the Scoob I ran a couple of quotes and they were higher than Evo's and the like so I'd definately get a quote or 2 before you look into it any further.

Don't know what they're like but I think the tip is to be avoided from what I've head which isn't a lot. They do sound pretty nice though

mrmr96

13,736 posts

228 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
They look like they should chase lotus's but in reality they chase modeos. The performance doesn't match up to the looks, unless you modify.

Depending what your goals are there's probably a better car out there for you.

TotalControl

8,295 posts

222 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
Dove one for 2 days early last year and hated it. I reckon my ST202 Celica is better. It just felt quite cramped and restrictive whereas the Celica feels quite spacious on the inside. I prefer the drive on mine too.

HellaflushGT

38 posts

193 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
Had a MIVEC TIP for about a year or so..

Sold it on because the performance was actually abismal beside the fuel consumption!

It just didn't add up!

The fastest looking, slow car. Period.

I would definately look at other cars such as the Celica, before these.

eybic

9,212 posts

198 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
I have heard they are very very disappointing performance wise.

steve_bmw

1,591 posts

199 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
i had one and thoight it was fantastic, yer there not the fastest cars on the road, but they are cool!
i had the v6 non mivec so 180 hp,25+ mpg, manual, 1996, grey, proper little minter.
i would have another.

floydbax

110 posts

194 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
I have had a manual MIVEC one of these for 10 years and I agree they are fantastic cars. For a car that could be anything between ten and sixteen years old they still hold their own against much newer mid-size coupes in the looks department (even those that have had 'tasteful' exterior modifications!) and performance-wise they are adequate although not as powerful as maybe they should have come from the factory, but from a N/A engine performance is pretty good. You need to learn how to drive using high revs where the power is. As the OP said, the sound of the 2.0 litre V6 screaming in the MIVEC zone up to over 8000 RPM is addictive. They are also now cheap and easy to buy, insure and maintain.

EDITED: Yeah they are FWD but they are one of the best handling FWD cars ever made, similar chracteristics as the Integra Tyre R (and that car is well known for its good FWD handling). They are often complained about for being a hard ride, but it IS a sports car after all. This already good handling can be easliy improved with many aftermarket add ons.

Edited by floydbax on Thursday 18th March 19:28


EDITED X2: http://www.pistonheads.com/GASSING/topic.asp?h=0&a... A fairly accurate write-up from another FTO owner.

Edited by floydbax on Thursday 18th March 20:52

Pekwah1

74 posts

205 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
it's also wrong wheel drive

Octoposse

2,376 posts

209 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
Great looking cars . . .

steve_bmw

1,591 posts

199 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
Pekwah1 said:
it's also wrong wheel drive
true, i do prefer rear drive but the fto is more of a cruiser than a sports car,
if your just pottering around looking good then i wouldnt be botherd what wheel drive it was!

dr.pepper

Original Poster:

634 posts

218 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
Thank you for your input gents. Judging from the response regarding the performance, surely a manual version would be the answer?

It seems that the Tiptronic slows things down somewhat.


steve_bmw

1,591 posts

199 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
oh yes, manual all the way,
my wories when buying an auto would be, its an import, rare, if the auto box goes your stuck, its going to be expensive !
if your going to get one get a manual.

_Al_

5,618 posts

282 months

Saturday 20th March 2010
quotequote all
floydbax said:
EDITED X2: http://www.pistonheads.com/GASSING/topic.asp?h=0&a... A fairly accurate write-up from another FTO owner.
That'd be me..


Mine is the 5 speed manual GPX Mivec. It's adequately fast, but not really a sports car. The insurance is steep at almost £800 (£250 more than my MR2 Turbo was) but nowhere near as much as my Impreza was (last quote £1,400!!!). The Scooby and the '2 were virtually standard, the FTO has tinted windows, wheels, exhaust induction and suspension.

I get 30mpg easily.

It is a tidy handler but not mind-blowing. Corners relatively flat with minimal roll, capable of quite lairy lift-off oversteer (which I discovered because the actual grip is WAY lower than I was expecting). It's wearing Toyos but can't seem to corner at the same speed my MR2 could on Nankang-ditchfinders. I do wonder if the geo setup is out.

Overall - I did test drive some Celicas/Hondas and I prefer the FTO by miles, both to look at and to drive. Wins on noise by default of course. That V6 really can sing.

I'd say own one if you just want a road car and have the cash spare. It'll make you smile when you drive it and when you walk up to it. If you want a track capable car buy something else..

Edited by _Al_ on Saturday 20th March 10:15

nottyash

4,671 posts

219 months

Saturday 20th March 2010
quotequote all
dr.pepper said:
I heard an FTO zip past me today and it sounded very nice. Naturally this got me curious.

Do the tiptronics zap a lot of power? I've seen the quoted 0-60 as slow as 9.2 seconds in some places and around 8 seconds for the MIVEC. This does seem a little lacklustre in comparison to to other cars in a similair power bracket.

I've been told that the best buy is the Manual GR as it is quicker/cheaper to insure than a Tiptronic Mivec. Is there any truth to this?

I looked into these. The Mivec is the 200bhp 2.0 V6, available in semi Auto and manual. The Manual makes best sense as its 10mph faster and a second quicker to 60.
Your right about condition, a lot of chavved up st out there.
They are cheap, but Manuals tend to fetch more than the tiptronic.
Ive only ever driven a GPr Version R which was manual, and as far as I can make out its a lighter version of the GPX with blue seats. It was good, but it was £11000 when I drove it back in 2003, and even then it was expensive for what it was. I bought a rev3 MR2 Turbo T bar for half that, even that had its faults though.
Keep looking, they do come up, but prices are all over, from £1500 to £4000. I would guess a good one will be about £2500. Thats the kind of price you could import one yourself for now.

maffy32

1,013 posts

216 months

Saturday 20th March 2010
quotequote all
i had one and you cant beat the look of them but thats it if i ws to buy another it would have to have an evo engine fitted

i raced a honda civic 1.6 ek9 type r and got blown away the vtec has a more aggresive cross over than the mivic too

mr2-turbo-gar

146 posts

220 months

Saturday 20th March 2010
quotequote all
maffy32 said:
i had one and you cant beat the look of them but thats it if i ws to buy another it would have to have an evo engine fitted

i raced a honda civic 1.6 ek9 type r and got blown away the vtec has a more aggresive cross over than the mivic too
Ditto,
i used to a have an ek9 and my buddy had an fto and i used to have the run on him every time,
does anyone know what the weight of one is cause judging by the weight of my buddy's doors they are nearly on par with a hummer!!

_Al_

5,618 posts

282 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
mr2-turbo-gar said:
maffy32 said:
i had one and you cant beat the look of them but thats it if i ws to buy another it would have to have an evo engine fitted

i raced a honda civic 1.6 ek9 type r and got blown away the vtec has a more aggresive cross over than the mivic too
Ditto,
i used to a have an ek9 and my buddy had an fto and i used to have the run on him every time,
does anyone know what the weight of one is cause judging by the weight of my buddy's doors they are nearly on par with a hummer!!
Manual is under 1,200kg IIRC

mr2-turbo-gar

146 posts

220 months

Tuesday 23rd March 2010
quotequote all
_Al_ said:
mr2-turbo-gar said:
maffy32 said:
i had one and you cant beat the look of them but thats it if i ws to buy another it would have to have an evo engine fitted

i raced a honda civic 1.6 ek9 type r and got blown away the vtec has a more aggresive cross over than the mivic too
Ditto,
i used to a have an ek9 and my buddy had an fto and i used to have the run on him every time,
does anyone know what the weight of one is cause judging by the weight of my buddy's doors they are nearly on par with a hummer!!
Manual is under 1,200kg IIRC
found it very hard to believe so had to go check for myself, i stand corrected! bow
http://www.j-garage.com/mitsubishi/fto/de3a.htm