Ride height.
Ride height.
Author
Discussion

Poledriver

Original Poster:

29,348 posts

218 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
Hi all, I know this shot is not at the best angle but can I have your thoughts on the ride height. Does this look right, or is it too low?

Or does anyone have a 'factory' measurement from the ground to the top of the wheel arches?


Gazzab

21,581 posts

306 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
It is lower than factory but looks ok for nitron etc set up. If it is too low then get it raised?
You keeping the 'spoiler'?

Poledriver

Original Poster:

29,348 posts

218 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
I don't want to adjust it unless I have to, just wondering if this was the 'normal' ride height. I'll wait to see what happens when I find some speed bumps.

And yes, the spoiler is staying. It would cost a lot to get the boot-lid filled and resprayed just to please the 'conventionalists'. I'm getting used to it, I'm sure everyone else can. If not, that's just tough! smile

Ireland

3,517 posts

238 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
It looks low.

130mm from the ground to the bottom of the chassis rails (more accurate than measuring to the "plastic" arches which can vary from car to car) was the original height.

Poledriver

Original Poster:

29,348 posts

218 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
Ireland said:
It looks low.

130mm from the ground to the bottom of the chassis rails (more accurate than measuring to the "plastic" arches which can vary from car to car) was the original height.
Thanks! I'll go out an have a measure up when it stops raining!

M3John

5,974 posts

243 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
Probably not the best of pictures but it's the only profile one i have at the minute and will give you a rough idea (i hope) as to how mine is sitting. When i bought it i sent it into TaylorTVR, had all the Geo set up on it and had it highered (about an inch at the front and 2 inches at the rear) as to me it was sitting far to low. From your picture though i'd say that it does look a bit on the low side.





Edited by M3John on Friday 19th March 15:51

JensenA

5,671 posts

254 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
M3John said:
Probably not the best of pictures but it's the only profile one i have at the minute and will give you a rough idea (i hope) as to how mine is sitting. When i bought it i sent it into TaylorTVR, had all the Geo set up on it and had it highered (about an inch at the front and 2 inches at the rear) as to me it was sitting far to low. From your picture though i'd say that it does look a bit on the low side.

Nice Car. Did you kill the Witch, or did she just run off?

Edited by JensenA on Friday 19th March 16:04

shoggyraminator

255 posts

200 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
Just FYI I've measured mine from ground to top of arch and it's 69cm @ rear and 63.5cm @the front. Standard sus as far as I know.

M3John

5,974 posts

243 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
JensenA said:
M3John said:
Probably not the best of pictures but it's the only profile one i have at the minute and will give you a rough idea (i hope) as to how mine is sitting. When i bought it i sent it into TaylorTVR, had all the Geo set up on it and had it highered (about an inch at the front and 2 inches at the rear) as to me it was sitting far to low. From your picture though i'd say that it does look a bit on the low side.

Nice Car. Did you kill the Witch, or did she just run off?

Edited by JensenA on Friday 19th March 16:04
Cheers. After she got a good look at me she just run off ! hehe

FarmyardPants

4,303 posts

242 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
Poledriver said:
Hi all, I know this shot is not at the best angle but can I have your thoughts on the ride height. Does this look right, or is it too low?

Or does anyone have a 'factory' measurement from the ground to the top of the wheel arches?

It looks a bit low, but not excessively so. But with the downforce generated by the spoiler, you might rub the arches at high speed.

Poledriver

Original Poster:

29,348 posts

218 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
FarmyardPants said:
Poledriver said:
Hi all, I know this shot is not at the best angle but can I have your thoughts on the ride height. Does this look right, or is it too low?

Or does anyone have a 'factory' measurement from the ground to the top of the wheel arches?

It looks a bit low, but not excessively so. But with the downforce generated by the spoiler, you might rub the arches at high speed.
rolleyes it does rub a little at 180MPH so I think I'll raise it a tad! biggrin

al 350i

974 posts

219 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
don't think the spoiler looks to bad but if you did want it remove try rob at http://www.carbondesign.co.uk/cd/ would be a lot cheaper than you think and his colour match is excellent. he just painted dan's (Taylor TVR) chimaera.

Edited by al 350i on Friday 19th March 22:30


Edited by al 350i on Friday 19th March 22:31

Pursyluv

1,949 posts

198 months

Friday 19th March 2010
quotequote all
My Nitrons were set up too low by a reputable garage; this scrubbed all tread from the inner 25mm of the front tyres (18" on Spiders), ensure you check this if this is the height you intend to run - it looks a tad on the low side to me, but please check with your local specialist before you have them adjusted

ukkid35

6,392 posts

197 months

Tuesday 25th June 2013
quotequote all
Could someone explain the official measuring points, I can't find them in the WSM. Is it the chassis rails, or the outriggers, or the bolt heads on the outriggers, or somewhere else entirely?

Also, is it 130mm all round, or 125mm F and 130mm R?

TIA

Vee8ight

734 posts

163 months

Tuesday 25th June 2013
quotequote all
ukkid35 said:
Could someone explain the official measuring points, I can't find them in the WSM. Is it the chassis rails, or the outriggers, or the bolt heads on the outriggers, or somewhere else entirely?

Also, is it 130mm all round, or 125mm F and 130mm R?

TIA
From an official ex TVR chassis engineer, the front wheel was meant to follow the contour of the arch and the rear slightly higher!
OR measure the length of the dampers when the wheels are on the ground. Front 325 mm rear 353mm

ukkid35

6,392 posts

197 months

Tuesday 25th June 2013
quotequote all
Vee8ight said:
From an official ex TVR chassis engineer, the front wheel was meant to follow the contour of the arch and the rear slightly higher!
OR measure the length of the dampers when the wheels are on the ground. Front 325 mm rear 353mm
Many thanks - interesting, but uber awkward to measure.

Vee8ight

734 posts

163 months

Tuesday 25th June 2013
quotequote all
ukkid35 said:
Vee8ight said:
From an official ex TVR chassis engineer, the front wheel was meant to follow the contour of the arch and the rear slightly higher!
OR measure the length of the dampers when the wheels are on the ground. Front 325 mm rear 353mm
Many thanks - interesting, but uber awkward to measure.
I know, that's probably why the TVR guys used the first method, lol

Tang Soo Tim

506 posts

193 months

Wednesday 26th June 2013
quotequote all
My Ride height was all set by Centre Gravity, raised mine by 25mm rear 20mm front and car handles superb now over these lovely uk roads ! 'ill check later to arches.

Top tip if you want your car to handle better just take it to those guys smile best money I ever spent !

aide

2,278 posts

188 months

Wednesday 26th June 2013
quotequote all
M3John said:
Cheers. After she got a good look at me she just run off ! hehe
And who said wimen' are no good at parallel parking?! getmecoat

Jhonno

6,430 posts

165 months

Wednesday 26th June 2013
quotequote all
Tang Soo Tim said:
My Ride height was all set by Centre Gravity, raised mine by 25mm rear 20mm front and car handles superb now over these lovely uk roads ! 'ill check later to arches.

Top tip if you want your car to handle better just take it to those guys smile best money I ever spent !
Pics of how yours sits?