Another tyresome question
Another tyresome question
Author
Discussion

boltontvr

Original Poster:

264 posts

286 months

Thursday 19th February 2004
quotequote all
What is the speed rating needed for 225/50 15 tyres?
You can get Toyo Proxes TS-1 tyres for £69.90 on www.mytyres.co.uk, but they are V rated. Is a Z rated tyre required? Hopefully not, because at seventy quid, plus maybe another tenner for fitting, they are much cheaper than elsewhere.

redcar

737 posts

268 months

Thursday 19th February 2004
quotequote all
Kim.
I have checked with my company tyre supplier and they have advised the following.
V rated tyres are tested to 130MPH
Z rated tyres are tested to 150+MHP

It depends how fast you want to go, but Z are safer I would have thought.
Martin.

>> Edited by redcar on Thursday 19th February 16:25

streaky

19,311 posts

271 months

Thursday 19th February 2004
quotequote all
FWIW, "Black Circles" (www.blackcircles.com/tyres/speedrating) quote both Z with a top speed of 149mph. W is given as 168 and Y as 186. Goodyear quote ZR as 149+.

If you do not fit tyres with the original (or higher) rating, it is a potential MOT failure point.

Streaky

19560

14,022 posts

280 months

Thursday 19th February 2004
quotequote all
Splitting hairs, neither of the above replies is accurate. Fit W, Y, or Z for the 390, V are OK for a 350. Not an MoT failure for any fitment but don't let that influence you; safety and fitness for purpose is more important. Full answer is complex, lengthy and not really worth hearing. J

jmorgan

36,010 posts

306 months

Thursday 19th February 2004
quotequote all
I had the ZR Proxy's a few weeks ago. They were listed at around 50p more expensive than the V.

NHyde

1,427 posts

270 months

Thursday 19th February 2004
quotequote all
bolton TVR YHM

jvaughan

6,025 posts

305 months

Thursday 19th February 2004
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
I had the ZR Proxy's a few weeks ago. They were listed at around 50p more expensive than the V.


yes, generally the higher the speed rating, the softer the rubber compound, and the quicker they wear out.

I put the wrong tyre on my old cavalier... 3x HR rated, one VR rated. The odd one lasted about 6000 miles, where as the other three lasted about 9 - 10,000 miles.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

306 months

Thursday 19th February 2004
quotequote all
jvaughan said:

jmorgan said:
I had the ZR Proxy's a few weeks ago. They were listed at around 50p more expensive than the V.



yes, generally the higher the speed rating, the softer the rubber compound, and the quicker they wear out.

I put the wrong tyre on my old cavalier... 3x HR rated, one VR rated. The odd one lasted about 6000 miles, where as the other three lasted about 9 - 10,000 miles.


That explains a few things. Wasn't aware of that.

boltontvr

Original Poster:

264 posts

286 months

Friday 20th February 2004
quotequote all
NHyde said:
bolton TVR YHM

Neil, so do you.

jmorgan said:
I had the ZR Proxy's a few weeks ago. They were listed at around 50p more expensive than the V.

I've noticed the difference in price on Blackcircles, unfortunately mytyres don't quote for z rated tyres.
You've all pretty much confirmed what I already thought, I just didn't want to pass up on a bargain .

TaSmania

782 posts

285 months

Friday 20th February 2004
quotequote all
Jason, I can't believe you admitted to owning a Cavaliar. It's nearly as bad as someone owning a Maestro - oops!
Tas

jvaughan

6,025 posts

305 months

Friday 20th February 2004
quotequote all
TaSmania said:
Jason, I can't believe you admitted to owning a Cavaliar. It's nearly as bad as someone owning a Maestro - oops!
Tas


Dont you believe it, I still struggle to find a car that is as good an all rounder than my cavalier 1.8 GL

Before the Cav, I used to have a Fiat Uno too

streaky

19,311 posts

271 months

Friday 20th February 2004
quotequote all
19560 said:
Splitting hairs, neither of the above replies is accurate. Fit W, Y, or Z for the 390, V are OK for a 350. Not an MoT failure for any fitment but don't let that influence you; safety and fitness for purpose is more important. Full answer is complex, lengthy and not really worth hearing. J
You are quite correct about the MOT failure from a tyre rating perspective, I was quoting an (obviously incorrect) online source - S

ralph dodds

148 posts

276 months

Friday 20th February 2004
quotequote all
19560 said:
Not an MoT failure for any fitment but don't let that influence you; safety and fitness for purpose is more important. Full answer is complex, lengthy and not really worth hearing. J


The other issue that you may wish to consider is insurance. A friend of mine had an own fault accident a couple of years ago in a BMW to which he'd fitted HR rated tyres on a car that should have been fitted with VR. Even though the accident was at 40mph the insurance company argued that he had failed to keep the car in a roadworthy condition and refused to pay out. It went to court and the insurance company won.