Council Tax Inspections
Author
Discussion

NDA

Original Poster:

24,573 posts

247 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all

I've just received a letter informing me that the 'Valuation Office Agency' would like to come and inspect my house for the banding of domestic properties for Council Tax.

They say 'we may ask to go inside the property', 'take photographs'..... 'if there are any alterations, additions this could effect your banding'.

I can see no information that says they have the right to do any of this. Do they?

Our property cannot be seen from a public road and is behind substantial and solid gates - so unless we open the gates, they cannot see or get onto the land.

I do object to the fact that these overpaid bureaucrats could make any attempt to extort more money than the £10 a day I already pay them for their zero services. Their £200k a year chief exec is a lazy tt.

I'm minded to not answer the gates, but wondered if they have a legal right to inspect?

randlemarcus

13,644 posts

253 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
http://www.adamafriyie.org.uk/PR%20-%20Inspectors%... might inform your decision as to whether to respond to the letter at all. They do have the legal right, but not sure how much access they can have without you talking to them.

NDA

Original Poster:

24,573 posts

247 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all

Interesting - thanks.

The letter was not personally addressed, simply 'The Council Tax Payer' and then my address.

Because I may have improved my property, I'm not really sure why this should consequently cost me more to have my rubbish collected. I have one bin, the same as everyone else..... We don't use the schools or libraries and don't use any other council services I can think of.

We won't let them in - let's see what happens!

ShadownINja

79,236 posts

304 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
NDA said:
Because I may have improved my property, I'm not really sure why this should consequently cost me more to have my rubbish collected. I have one bin, the same as everyone else..... We don't use the schools or libraries and don't use any other council services I can think of.
Indeed. It's bullst, isn't it. I am in the same position. I have my bin collected once a month as I just don't have that much rubbish. 3 Tesco bags max a month I think.

fatboy b

9,662 posts

238 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Unless a letter has my name on it, it goes straight in the bin.

ShadownINja

79,236 posts

304 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
fatboy b said:
Unless a letter has my name on it, it goes straight in the bin.
Watch out for the poll registration letter!! I think it's a legal requirement to send them back.

vxsmithers

729 posts

222 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
my parents had their house re-assessed from the roadside. It resulted in an instant increase in banding for no reason.

I'd hate to think what they'd do if they actually go into a property...

It beggars belief that they can do this when it was properly banded in 1991, and no changes have been made. The resultant appeal failed, and cannot be contested again, so once again the bureaucrats have no-one to answer to and you have no appeal against their decision.

I reckon they'll shaft you too, why would they assess somewhere if they weren't fully expecting to get more money out of you?

Makes me feel all warm and fluffy inside....

NDA

Original Poster:

24,573 posts

247 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
vxsmithers said:
It beggars belief that they can do this when it was properly banded in 1991, and no changes have been made. The resultant appeal failed, and cannot be contested again, so once again the bureaucrats have no-one to answer to and you have no appeal against their decision.
I wrote four times last year to the Head of Revenue Collection at my local council to ask him to explain their policy on charging full rates on empty properties (I had a couple of empty houses that wouldn't sell) - didn't receive a reply to any of the letters, including the hand delivered and registered post ones. My query was that I was already paying for their meagre 'services' on a third property in the same village, so wasn't clear why I was being charged twice more for school places, bin collection etc on properties with no occupants.

They are truly answerable to nobody. And yet they have a right, so it would seem, to come into my house and take photographs with a view to charging me more to have my bin collected once a month.

Dupont666

22,488 posts

214 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
NDA said:
vxsmithers said:
It beggars belief that they can do this when it was properly banded in 1991, and no changes have been made. The resultant appeal failed, and cannot be contested again, so once again the bureaucrats have no-one to answer to and you have no appeal against their decision.
I wrote four times last year to the Head of Revenue Collection at my local council to ask him to explain their policy on charging full rates on empty properties (I had a couple of empty houses that wouldn't sell) - didn't receive a reply to any of the letters, including the hand delivered and registered post ones. My query was that I was already paying for their meagre 'services' on a third property in the same village, so wasn't clear why I was being charged twice more for school places, bin collection etc on properties with no occupants.

They are truly answerable to nobody. And yet they have a right, so it would seem, to come into my house and take photographs with a view to charging me more to have my bin collected once a month.
I thought that if the property was empty and devoid of furniture, it was classed as unfurnished:

http://www.southhams.gov.uk/index/residents_index/...

but then that is only 6months...

I wonder if you could use that and:

http://www.southhams.gov.uk/index/residents_index/...

to get 18months free

Chrisgr31

14,199 posts

277 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
I think the VO does have the legal right to inspect your property, however have never heard of it being enforced. The reality is they can do a lot of it using Googles Streetview, Google Earth, Planning history etc. They won't know your name as the DPA prevents local councils giving them that information.

If you don't give them access they will have to guess the banding, but do note they cannot take into account any extension or improvement you have made only those made before you bought it or those made prior to 1991. So if you double or quadruple the size of your house the banding will stay the samew until a revaluation or sale.

NDA

Original Poster:

24,573 posts

247 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Dupont666 said:
I thought that if the property was empty and devoid of furniture, it was classed as unfurnished....
Each council has its own rules - unfortunately.

alfa pint

3,856 posts

233 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
We got our flat downgraded a level, so it was worth it for us.....

Coco H

4,237 posts

259 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Do the bandings relate to current value then. I live in a house which I miught have gutted and made more habitable and erm added some footage too etc . I thought BandE was a bit ott as it is. Perhaps we shoudl hide!

Emmapuma

513 posts

221 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Our council is useless, we moved into our rented property back in november and was told by the agents that we would receive documents from the utilties and the council so we could sort out paying for stuff. we got the water one first then a day or so later got the electric and gas, no sign of anything from the council.
after a week i was worried so phoned our agent who said it was strange as they are normally the first one to send documents through.
I phoned the council 4 times, logging each call and making a note of who i had spoken to - each one knew nothing about the previous attempts to find out what was happening. Finally we got a letter at the beginning of February with them demanded nearly £550. I hit the roof. My Fiance phoned them and told them there was no way we could afford that amount of money straight off and that it was their fault for ignoring all attempts previous. Best they could do was for us to pay half in feb and half this month.
Its a joke, and for what?! they dont collect your rubbish if the lid isnt closed, they have not fixed any pot holes on any of the roads round here, they wouldnt provide rock salt for public paths on our estate over winter.

bazking69

8,620 posts

212 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
I'd rather be taken to court than allow anyone through the door without my permission.

My house, my property, my privacy. End of. They can reclassify from the outside and write to me with their finding. What happens within the confines of my property is my business.

The thought of a load of goons in suits allowing themselves right of way to walk through my house making notes and judgment on how to stiff me frankly fills me with rage.

MrsMiggins

2,867 posts

257 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Emmapuma said:
Our council is useless, we moved into our rented property back in november and was told by the agents that we would receive documents from the utilties and the council so we could sort out paying for stuff. we got the water one first then a day or so later got the electric and gas, no sign of anything from the council.
after a week i was worried so phoned our agent who said it was strange as they are normally the first one to send documents through.
I phoned the council 4 times, logging each call and making a note of who i had spoken to - each one knew nothing about the previous attempts to find out what was happening. Finally we got a letter at the beginning of February with them demanded nearly £550. I hit the roof. My Fiance phoned them and told them there was no way we could afford that amount of money straight off and that it was their fault for ignoring all attempts previous. Best they could do was for us to pay half in feb and half this month.
Its a joke, and for what?! they dont collect your rubbish if the lid isnt closed, they have not fixed any pot holes on any of the roads round here, they wouldnt provide rock salt for public paths on our estate over winter.
Erm...you knew they would come looking for the money eventually, didn't you? Why didn't you just estimate the amount and put it aside?

James P

3,031 posts

259 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
vxsmithers said:
my parents had their house re-assessed from the roadside. It resulted in an instant increase in banding for no reason.

I'd hate to think what they'd do if they actually go into a property...

It beggars belief that they can do this when it was properly banded in 1991, and no changes have been made. The resultant appeal failed, and cannot be contested again, so once again the bureaucrats have no-one to answer to and you have no appeal against their decision.

I reckon they'll shaft you too, why would they assess somewhere if they weren't fully expecting to get more money out of you?

Makes me feel all warm and fluffy inside....
I had my house assessed after I moved in May 2008. There was only one person who came, pleasant enough lady and did not appear to have decided to increase the banding regardless.

She came armed with some very old plans of the property - circa 1960's I think - and only seemed interested in the fact that there were now fewer rooms than before. It was done before I moved in but I think 3 small rooms were made into 1. That seemed to make her mind up that there was no need to increase the band and that was that.

I would say that if you do prevent access you are only giving them reason to suspect that you think the current band is wrong.

Bill

57,064 posts

277 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
NDA said:
'if there are any alterations, additions this could effect your banding'
This is the bit that gets me fking bds. You don't get a rebate for living in a building site for months on end.

Deva Link

26,934 posts

267 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
NDA said:
Their £200k a year chief exec is a lazy tt.
Do you have proof (that would stand up in a libel court) of that?

Bill

57,064 posts

277 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
NDA said:
Their £200k a year chief exec is a lazy tt.
Do you have proof (that would stand up in a libel court) of that?
Does opinion need proof?