Children not in car seats.
Children not in car seats.
Author
Discussion

gtidriver

Original Poster:

3,719 posts

218 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
Why is it i still see people driving around with kids unrestrained in cars, saw on m25 yesterday a BMW coupe ra02***with two small kids on adult laps in the back only the front passengers belted up. The most I've seen is seven kids and three adults in a escort estate two in the boot one stood in the front foot well and the rest on the back seat only the adults where wearing belts. What does the law say about this?
This really grates my gonads..

kambites

71,698 posts

252 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
It's illegal.

One could also argue that it's another nanny-state-ism and none of anyone else's business.

GreigM

6,740 posts

280 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
yup, its illegal - but why should you care - natural selection if they crash

*Al*

3,830 posts

253 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
Yes this has been discussed many times before, i find it disgusting that a child is not protected from potential harm by it's parent/gaurdian.Seen this many many times and feel like having a go at these irresponsible people! Hate to say it but the usual 'types' that do this are 'non British looking' individuals, go figure.

Somnophore

1,364 posts

207 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
Report them, it's illegal, dangerous and it's not fair on the children becuase they don't know any better it's their idiot parents who are being gits

gtidriver

Original Poster:

3,719 posts

218 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
Just remembered i saw in cape town a few years ago a ninja'd up muslim driving at 70mph with a kid stood in the front foot well.

Edited by gtidriver on Saturday 3rd April 10:45

Pints

18,451 posts

225 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
GreigM said:
yup, its illegal - but why should you care - natural selection if they crash
But if they're paralysed then it's us who pay for their benefits for the rest of their lives.

Please note I don't have an issue with genuine benefit payments for legitimate life-altering injuries but why not prevent it if possible.

kambites

71,698 posts

252 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
Pints said:
Please note I don't have an issue with genuine benefit payments for legitimate life-altering injuries but why not prevent it if possible.
Whilst I agree on principle, which is actually more likely to produce a long-term injury, not wearing a seat-belt and/or overloading a car, or regularly playing football, for example? I wouldn't be at all surprised if it's not the car.

nick heppinstall

9,102 posts

311 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
I saw a kid some time ago unrestrained in the back of a car. I got the number, stopped and reported it to the Police. They said they would call me back. Sure enough 15 minutes later a WPC called me back to get more details.

Said they were sending a car around to their house to have a word.


ewenm

28,506 posts

276 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
It's hard to legislate for stupidity. It's the sort of thing that shouldn't need a law as everyone should see the safest way to transport kids is suitably restrained.

nick heppinstall

9,102 posts

311 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
I remember as a kid spending hours and hours riding in the back of my Dads Cortina Estate. Even had a sleeping bag when we went on hols. The seats were folded down and I had all my cars and stuff in their as well.

It was ace biggrin

ewenm

28,506 posts

276 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
nick heppinstall said:
I remember as a kid spending hours and hours riding in the back of my Dads Cortina Estate. Even had a sleeping bag when we went on hols. The seats were folded down and I had all my cars and stuff in their as well.

It was ace biggrin
I remember sitting in the boot of my dad's Renault 12 Estate, unrestrained, but I guess traffic levels were lower 20-25 years ago hehe

nick heppinstall

9,102 posts

311 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
20-25 years ? And the rest for me. My mum and dad also smoked. I remember the car having that much smoke in it it was like been in cloud.

Same at home. I rememebr a layer of smoke starting just above my head when I was a kid.

If they thought at the time it was probably not doing me any good they would have been horrified.

Dangerous Dan

624 posts

202 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
GreigM said:
yup, its illegal - but why should you care - natural selection if they crash
+1

Think of it this way - they crash and die, that's less mouths for the state of care for/feed.

nick heppinstall

9,102 posts

311 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
Thats a very responsible and mature outlook from you both ..... rolleyes

paulshears

804 posts

228 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
I was behind a Corsa the other day..... 2 sign's in the back window, 1 said baby on board, the other was keep your distance

Little lad was stood up on the back seat playing with toys on the parcel shelf frown

jas xjr

11,309 posts

270 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
a while back i saw an astra van with a child in a carrycot in the loadspace yikes

Tycho

12,296 posts

304 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
If you want to kill yourself then fine but if you are a responsible parent then you'd make sure the child is as safe as possible.

bazking69

8,620 posts

221 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
Another nail in the argument for more traffic police and less speed cameras IMO.

TheCarpetCleaner

7,294 posts

233 months

Saturday 3rd April 2010
quotequote all
paulshears said:
I was behind a Corsa the other day..... 2 sign's in the back window, 1 said baby on board, the other was keep your distance

Little lad was stood up on the back seat playing with toys on the parcel shelf frown
It's a shame they don't do "fkwit on board is driving, keep your distance to protect your paintwork" signs in those circumstances. They would be more apt.