what would your ideal election result be?
Discussion
Fittster said:
Turnout of less than 50% of the electorate.
So you can be in the majority of dissenters of democracy by refusing to vote. Well I hate to break it to you, but the turnout will probably match or better the 1997 General Election, which was 71%.I can guarantee that you will be in the MINORITY.
A working Conservative majority. The Lib Dems second. (This last part will never happen).
Bercow to lose his seat to anyone else.
And finally...the Tories to work out that they'd quite possibly be better off with a form of PR and to team up with the Lib Dems on implementing it: Not over the whole nation, something like a county: twenty or so constituencies. So you are still electing people who are relatively local.
Bercow to lose his seat to anyone else.
And finally...the Tories to work out that they'd quite possibly be better off with a form of PR and to team up with the Lib Dems on implementing it: Not over the whole nation, something like a county: twenty or so constituencies. So you are still electing people who are relatively local.
bonsai said:
Fittster said:
Turnout of less than 50% of the electorate.
So you can be in the majority of dissenters of democracy by refusing to vote. Well I hate to break it to you, but the turnout will probably match or better the 1997 General Election, which was 71%.I can guarantee that you will be in the MINORITY.
In 2001, turnout was the lowest recorded since 1945 (59.4%) and in 2007 it was 61%. Getting a new low turnout record for a general election is quite possible.
http://www.ukpolitical.info/Turnout45.htm
http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp20...
People are waking up to the fact that representative democracy doesn't deliver good government.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




kin grip of itself!.