Lotus/Proton R3 hot hatch
Discussion
What an abomination. 9 sec 0-60 time?! Who are they trying to kid?
I hope this isn't a repost - I have searched.
I hope this isn't a repost - I have searched.
Wheels24 said:
Back in the day Lotus cars were an outstanding example of how track knowledge could be transposed to road car know-how for the benefit of enhanced driving dynamics.
This was primarily due the similarly named Team Lotus F1 racing outfit and the expertise exchanged between these two entities.
When the late Colin Chapman’s racing team faded into obscurity during the 1990s we thought we’d never see the famous flower insignia in F1 again. This year though, Malaysian industrial giant Proton (who own a controlling share in Lotus cars too) has funded a return to F1 racing for the famous Lotus name.
Although the new Lotus Racing outfit has very little (nothing in fact) to do with the illustrious history of Team Lotus, this sure has not stopped Proton from indulging in some ill-conceived corporate branding. Witness the limited edition (thank goodness) Satria Neo R3 Lotus Racing hot hatch.
Proton’s rather average hatchback has been given the once-over by the Lotus car division’s very able engineers. The result is a green and yellow ode to Proton’s 25th anniversary.
Now, Lotus tuning cars which do not carry the Hethel company’s design signature is nothing new. It does an awful lot of consultancy work in the automotive industry (for amongst others, Porsche), yet dressing up a Satria Neo in traditional Lotus F1 racing colours will surely be seen as an affront to Colin Chapman’s heritage.
Mechanically the Satria Neo R3 has been made as able as it can be, considering its rather undistinguished origins.
Lotus chassis engineers binned the stock dampers for Öhlins coil-overs, added new wheels (rolling Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 rubber) to each wheel corner and added a strut brace up front to rally against the lack of torsional rigidity.
Brakes are upgraded courtesy of AP racing four-pot callipers and rotors up front, with single-pot grabbers and discs at the rear.
In terms of go the Satria Neo’s 1.6l four-cylinder is helped to 108kW (without forced-induction) courtesy of revised exhaust plumbing and some ECU trickery. Proton says the 1.6l engine will happily spin to 7 500r/min in each of its five forward gears.
A carbon-fibre hood (amoungst other things) trims mass by 62kg (really, it does) and ensures the Satria Neo R3 Lotus Racing edition runs the benchmark 0-100km/h sprint in a shade over 9 seconds. We’re sure Colin Chapman would be thrilled.
Proton will only be producing 25 of these Satria Neo R3 Lotus Racing edition models, retailing for $35 000 a piece. Well, it’s the cheapest way to park some faux F1 derived branding in your driveway…
Pictures hereThis was primarily due the similarly named Team Lotus F1 racing outfit and the expertise exchanged between these two entities.
When the late Colin Chapman’s racing team faded into obscurity during the 1990s we thought we’d never see the famous flower insignia in F1 again. This year though, Malaysian industrial giant Proton (who own a controlling share in Lotus cars too) has funded a return to F1 racing for the famous Lotus name.
Although the new Lotus Racing outfit has very little (nothing in fact) to do with the illustrious history of Team Lotus, this sure has not stopped Proton from indulging in some ill-conceived corporate branding. Witness the limited edition (thank goodness) Satria Neo R3 Lotus Racing hot hatch.
Proton’s rather average hatchback has been given the once-over by the Lotus car division’s very able engineers. The result is a green and yellow ode to Proton’s 25th anniversary.
Now, Lotus tuning cars which do not carry the Hethel company’s design signature is nothing new. It does an awful lot of consultancy work in the automotive industry (for amongst others, Porsche), yet dressing up a Satria Neo in traditional Lotus F1 racing colours will surely be seen as an affront to Colin Chapman’s heritage.
Mechanically the Satria Neo R3 has been made as able as it can be, considering its rather undistinguished origins.
Lotus chassis engineers binned the stock dampers for Öhlins coil-overs, added new wheels (rolling Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 rubber) to each wheel corner and added a strut brace up front to rally against the lack of torsional rigidity.
Brakes are upgraded courtesy of AP racing four-pot callipers and rotors up front, with single-pot grabbers and discs at the rear.
In terms of go the Satria Neo’s 1.6l four-cylinder is helped to 108kW (without forced-induction) courtesy of revised exhaust plumbing and some ECU trickery. Proton says the 1.6l engine will happily spin to 7 500r/min in each of its five forward gears.
A carbon-fibre hood (amoungst other things) trims mass by 62kg (really, it does) and ensures the Satria Neo R3 Lotus Racing edition runs the benchmark 0-100km/h sprint in a shade over 9 seconds. We’re sure Colin Chapman would be thrilled.
Proton will only be producing 25 of these Satria Neo R3 Lotus Racing edition models, retailing for $35 000 a piece. Well, it’s the cheapest way to park some faux F1 derived branding in your driveway…
Not a new idea from Proton, you can get most of the Protons with a handling by Lotus/lotus Engineering badge on them. US$ 35K is a cheap car in Malaysia, look at mudah.com for prices. 110,000 Rm they will be able to sell them all here, won't matter how good they are. And I'm not sure Proton are funding the F1 team, they have given no objection to the use of the name, but the F1 car carries the Naza name, Naza are a Malysian car asemmbler and Proton competitor in the domestic market.
Doesn't really explain why they're making a big deal about a car with carbon fibre bits, etc. and all it an manage is a 9+sec 0-60 time. I can't see the handling being any better than a Rover 25, since I doubt Lotus really had much input in the chassis department.
Just me being sceptical.
Just me being sceptical.
Pints said:
Doesn't really explain why they're making a big deal about a car with carbon fibre bits, etc. and all it an manage is a 9+sec 0-60 time. I can't see the handling being any better than a Rover 25, since I doubt Lotus really had much input in the chassis department.
Just me being sceptical.
IIRC, the old "Handling by Lotus" Satria with the bolt-on bodykit handled quite respectably, according to the EVO review. The engine was shocking, though. I'd really like them to do a Lotus Carlton on something Proton. Just me being sceptical.
Just too slow, they should have lightened it way more and aimed to get it to 0-60 in 6-7secs. 9 seconds to 60 in this day and age just doesn't feel like a fast car, it should have at least topped the talbot sunbeam lotus' time of 7.something.
I like the interior though, great shame it doesn't have hot hatch performance.
I like the interior though, great shame it doesn't have hot hatch performance.
Gassing Station | Motoring News | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff