Remap for a 100k mile 3.0 m3 (E36)?
Remap for a 100k mile 3.0 m3 (E36)?
Author
Discussion

TARMUNCHER

Original Poster:

17 posts

194 months

Saturday 10th April 2010
quotequote all
Hi all,

Is it a wise investment, for a remap on a car with this mileage?
Anyone owned this car and had a remap?
Just wondering if it's worth the cash, some companies report a hike in power from 286 - 315!!!
Sounds a little optimistic to me from a NA engine. If not any other suggestions!

Appreciate your opinions if you've had the work carried out on a 3.0 M3.

Cheers

G

rash_decision

1,412 posts

201 months

Saturday 10th April 2010
quotequote all
If the engine is still good, there is no reason why not to have it re-mapped. I re-mapped (or rather changed the chip back in the old days!!) an Astra 16v GTE years ago to use on track. Lifted the limiter to 9100rpm, if I remember correctly(?), with high lift cams. That car had 130k miles on it!! If this car can handle it on a track all day long, then I'm sure an M3 will handle it, they are pretty bulletproof! I had an E36 M3 3.0 years ago and had it on a rolling road as I felt it was quicker than my previous one. It was showing 308 BHP, the guy said he couldn't be sure if it had been re-mapped or was just a good engine, as he had seen before. Try and get it on teh rollers before and after to make a comparison. Go for it!!

M3John

5,974 posts

243 months

Saturday 10th April 2010
quotequote all
Personally i wouldn't bother. I, like you, are always hankering for more power. Thought about a re-map but, if we're honest what am i going to gain. Probably very very little at all - maybe around 10hp if i'm lucky and have a following tail wind smile . I've had mine on the Dyno at Surrey Rolling Road and it came out with this :



Engine has never been apart. never blown up. 140k miles on the clock. Just well looked after with regular maintenance. If you want a increase in power (and trust me i'd love to) i think the only way your going to get a noticeable difference is to go down the route of forced induction.


M3J.

Edited by M3John on Saturday 10th April 17:01

Neil.D

2,878 posts

230 months

Saturday 10th April 2010
quotequote all
On a highly stressed engine like the M3, you wont notice much. If anything then went wrong you would only curse the day you had it tinkered with - regardless of whether that was the cause.

My M3 evo made 323bhp on the rollers, which is probably way too high. A few months later it struggled to make 300.
I never trust Dyno's. They are OK for identifying flat spots and fueling but max power? Too many variables IMO. Fuel, ambient tempreature, operator error etc etc.

I seem to have digressed.

TARMUNCHER

Original Poster:

17 posts

194 months

Saturday 10th April 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for your posts so far!

TheEnd

15,370 posts

212 months

Saturday 10th April 2010
quotequote all
In all fairness, you'd get to 300-ish, 14bhp is a bit more plausible and within reason.
You'll need a chip swap for a 3.0, if it is early, you can order a fit a chip yourself, if its a later car, you'll need the original chip read as it contains a serial number for the EWS immobiliser, or you get the immobiliser removed.

the changes would be felt more as sharper, more perky response, and more eager/connected to the engine.