Pulsar GTi-R vs Impreza Turbo
Pulsar GTi-R vs Impreza Turbo
Author
Discussion

CarZee

Original Poster:

13,382 posts

285 months

Wednesday 3rd April 2002
quotequote all
Anyone give me a good idea of which would make the better track car?

What 4wd system does the GTi-R have? Is it a haldex type or the fully mechanical type like in the Scooby?

Cheers
CarZee

Oh yeah.. Will blue LEDs in the washer jets improve the performance of these cars? I heard it does..

gtir

24,741 posts

284 months

Friday 26th April 2002
quotequote all
Hi,

Its the fully mechanical type I think. If I had the choice I would rather a Scooby for track, as its more modern and is less prone to breaking.

Although the R is quicker and less "common"

Ad

pwig

11,990 posts

288 months

Wednesday 29th May 2002
quotequote all
Id go for the Scooby, its less prone to Blowing up......

v8guinness

204 posts

299 months

Wednesday 29th May 2002
quotequote all
The GTiR's are quite reliable if standard, but durability not ideal for track use... also a bit nose heavy...

Even Scoobies need a lot of maintainance in hard use though, Evo's are more robust.

clositintelctual

22 posts

280 months

Sunday 9th June 2002
quotequote all
On a recent track day my 1993 M5 was substantialy faster than both scooby's and GT-IR's, it will cope with 5 track days a year without any signs of stress, apart from very badly scrubbed front tyres. I have to confess that this is at castle coombe which is a very fast circuit, i'm not so sure how it would compete on a much tighter circuit. It does suffer from boring understeer unless provoked by a heavy throttle

pigme

196 posts

281 months

Monday 24th June 2002
quotequote all
quote:

On a recent track day my 1993 M5 was substantialy faster than both scooby's and GT-IR's, it will cope with 5 track days a year without any signs of stress, apart from very badly scrubbed front tyres. I have to confess that this is at castle coombe which is a very fast circuit, i'm not so sure how it would compete on a much tighter circuit. It does suffer from boring understeer unless provoked by a heavy throttle


Again, it depends on driver as I has seen a 106 rallye beat a Scooby round bentwaters!
I suppose a tighter course will test the nimbleness of a 4wd to a rwd monster like the M5, I understand these cars have awsome handling but compared to two rally bred cars...not sure.

moleamol

15,887 posts

281 months

Tuesday 2nd July 2002
quotequote all
If you want a real track day car, and you want a rally type, you want an integrale. No girly understeer, loads of torque, and proper brakes, I had a modded GTIR and though the performance was very good, the brakes were very bad, and FWD bias 4WD is not much fun. From the 2 you said I would say a GTIR, much quicker. Both need mods to make a decent track car, might as well mod the quickest and cheapest

pjg

46,646 posts

293 months

Wednesday 3rd July 2002
quotequote all
And if you want a CHEAP track day car, get a 2.8 Capri. I've seen a few on track days with a roll cage stuck it and some decent pads and discs, and the guy was having a wail of a time... powersliding it all over the place.

In comparison, it was embarassing to watch some owners of performance cars tootling round as they didn't want to damage the tyres or brakes...