Todays Daily Mail (page 15)
Todays Daily Mail (page 15)
Author
Discussion

V6GTO

Original Poster:

11,579 posts

260 months

Thursday 26th February 2004
quotequote all
Today Micheal Howard has pledged to rip out all cameras that are placed to raise cash and not to save lives.I will be voting Tory next time but if thay get in I will not hold my breath.
In the meantime, Mr Howard, if you know we are beeing fleeced why are you not publicly shafting Tony Blair about it at Prime Ministers Question Time?

( sorry to repeat this from another thread but it deserves a proper airing )

apache

39,731 posts

302 months

Thursday 26th February 2004
quotequote all
That'll be all of them then..........no? surprise surprise.
Good to see the subject has become a vote winner eventually. Idris, Paul, ABD and all the others who fought and harangued their mps, wrote to the press and generally kicked up a fuss take a bow, it was not in vain.

Roadrage

603 posts

262 months

Thursday 26th February 2004
quotequote all
YEA RIGHT.


there jusdt dclare them all well sited and carry on colecting the cash.

once you dumb lot vote em in

deltaf

6,806 posts

271 months

Thursday 26th February 2004
quotequote all
Roadrage said:
YEA RIGHT.


there jusdt dclare them all well sited and carry on colecting the cash.

once you dumb lot vote em in


Agree with what youre sayin outlaw.
Cant trust any of em...they can all go jump off the pier as far as im concerned.

XM5ER

5,094 posts

266 months

Thursday 26th February 2004
quotequote all
And the criteria for which scamera is which, will be what?

icamm

2,153 posts

278 months

Thursday 26th February 2004
quotequote all
deltaf said:

Roadrage said:
YEA RIGHT.


there jusdt dclare them all well sited and carry on colecting the cash.

once you dumb lot vote em in



Agree with what youre sayin outlaw.
Cant trust any of em...they can all go jump off the pier as far as im concerned.
Yep, agreement here as well.

Haven't Labour just started a review in which they have so far managed to find no cameras wrongly sited?

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

274 months

Thursday 26th February 2004
quotequote all
According to the BBC website (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3514747.stm) quoted in the "Speed Cams to be Cut in London thread" (www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?f=10&h=&t=83475):

BBC said:

...
Shadow transport secretary Damian Green has called for a national audit of cameras.

He wants to know which are necessary for road safety and which appear to be used for raising money.

He said: "I'm delighted that the Metropolitan Commissioner has responded so quickly and sensibly to the misuse of speed cameras.

"Conservatives think they should only be used for road safety, not as a silent tax collector for Gordon Brown."

A spokeswoman for the Department of Transport told BBC News Online: "We are clear that cameras should only be used where there is a history of accidents.

"Cameras are there to save lives and change driver behaviour, they are not there to raise money.

"We recently wrote to all partnerships for assurance that all cameras are where they should be and early indications are that they are."


In that thread I accused the Tories of saying that they are where they should be. However, the quote was missing some detail. It seems that it's the DfT. So perhaps there is hope that something might change under Howard?

jeffreyarcher

675 posts

266 months

Thursday 26th February 2004
quotequote all
V6GTO said:
In the meantime, Mr Howard, if you know we are beeing fleeced why are you not publicly shafting Tony Blair about it at Prime Ministers Question Time?

Because the Prime Minister would point out in reply, on national television, that it was the Tories who introduced speed cameras and Michael Howard, in particular, as Home Secretary, who introduced Section 172. I.e. unless you 'fess up, we will prosecute you for that instead.