Plod laser accuracy

Author
Discussion

charltm

Original Poster:

2,102 posts

277 months

Friday 5th April 2002
quotequote all
Russky pal of mine was telling me US plod lasers accurate only to 10%. Is that the case with the UK ones, anyone?

andytk

1,558 posts

279 months

Friday 5th April 2002
quotequote all
also is plod allowed to aim at the back of your car as you pass him buy. I was under the impression that they had to aim at you oncoming. just wondering so I know where to fit a jammer should I get one in the future.

Andy

relaxitscool

382 posts

279 months

Saturday 6th April 2002
quotequote all
Having seen one of these in use I can say that they're very very accurate. In fact, when you show a motorist just what it measures their jaws usually hit the ground. Mine did.

In answer to the other post, they can measure oncoming or passing vehicles. However, if I were to fit a jammer I would only fit it to the front. My theory being that you should have seen the officer with the gun by the time you pass him and have already slowed down

Hope this is of help.

charltm

Original Poster:

2,102 posts

277 months

Tuesday 9th April 2002
quotequote all
not if he's on the downslope of a slip road waiting to join the motorway behind you once he's zapped you from the back!

XPLOD

53 posts

279 months

Tuesday 9th April 2002
quotequote all
The laser gun, which is the most modern and common in use by my white topped former colleagues, is deadly accurate. It can also "get you" from up to one kilometre away, so beware! They can zap traffic coming towards or driving away, but what Relaxitscool says is very sound. Also, the only way to stop someone accelerating away in to speed after them, which usually requires a motorcyclist on standby. Which is often present, as some very naughty motorists don't always stop when a hand is held aloft!

charltm

Original Poster:

2,102 posts

277 months

Tuesday 9th April 2002
quotequote all
if only I'd been accelerating away. The first time I was aware of having been 'got' was when I saw the (marked but no lights) car approaching from behind, while I was doing about 85mph (before reacting) - sadly had been clocked for much more (apparently)

Roop

6,012 posts

297 months

Tuesday 9th April 2002
quotequote all
LIDAR units are bang on as Xplod says - there's no way you can argue with one of those babies. I've sent my LIDAR diffusers away for replacement (kept falsing). but they've possibly saved my bacon in one instance that I know of. Going quite quick 85+ on the MWay and got 'shot' with a LIDAR. Diffusers went ape as did my LASER detector. Pair of plod on the bridge at around 1/4 mile with LIDAR unit. To be fair, the traffice was extremely light - there's wasn't another car within 500yds of me, but I was going a bit too fast...

Out of interest, on the A419 outside Cheltenham, there's often a police car on the bridge by M5 J11a with a plod what looks like staring through a box at the traffic on the dual carrigaeway below. Is this some sort of hand held LIDAR...? Thing is, he had the windows UP...! I though IR struggled to go through glass, and they'd have major problems.

I suppose they could have been buck-rogers style binoculars

charltm

Original Poster:

2,102 posts

277 months

Tuesday 9th April 2002
quotequote all
here's a question... the second thing the white hat said to me was "I do realise there was a silver BMW pushing up behind you that may have caused you to drive faster"... how do I know the speed on the laser was mine and not the BMW's, esp. given that I was doing a MUCH lower speed when I first noticed the police car?

ATG

21,938 posts

285 months

Tuesday 9th April 2002
quotequote all
You don't know it yours insofar as you have to take plod's word for the fact that he was pointing the laser at you. The spot of light the laser projects is going to be small. THere is no way it could point at both cars simultaneously or get a confused reading.

(re. infra-red light not going thru glass, far infrared won't pass, but I'm pretty sure near infrared will.)

kevinday

12,869 posts

293 months

Tuesday 9th April 2002
quotequote all
quote:

(re. infra-red light not going thru glass, far infrared won't pass, but I'm pretty sure near infrared will.)



In my thicko mode I would say it must do because I assume the unit has a lens?

craigtonner

2,574 posts

292 months

Wednesday 10th April 2002
quotequote all
Having got a hold of a Lastech LTI 20.20 laser gun manufacturers operators manual I can confirm that the device cannot be used through glass. Apparently the accuracy of the device cannot be brought into question in court since the device will actually error rather than give a measurement. If one is used over a bridge then the bridge height has to be taken into account in consideration of COSine. But unfortunately this is in favour of the driver and will read down the actual speed. Same can be said for angle of device to direction of traffic on the same physical plane.