F1 2004 rules..

Author
Discussion

minghis

Original Poster:

1,570 posts

253 months

Monday 1st March 2004
quotequote all
Any-one know what the rule changes this year are, specifically electronic aids? I heard that launch control had been banned but they still have traction control - I've looked on the usual F1 sites but can't see anything about this.

eric mc

122,332 posts

267 months

Monday 1st March 2004
quotequote all
More nonsense from the FIA.

The rule is - there are no rules. Cheating is the norm. The only way to supervise electronic skullduggery is to remove all chip based electronics from the car. A basic coil and alternator should be good enough.

FourWheelDrift

88,778 posts

286 months

Monday 1st March 2004
quotequote all
The following details the main rule changes for the 2004 Formula One season which starts in Melbourne, Australia, on March 7:


Engines

Limited to one per driver per race weekend from Friday practice onwards. Any driver who has to change an engine before qualifying will lose 10 places on the 20-place starting grid from wherever he qualifies.

A second change will cost another 10 places -- the back of the grid effectively.

Any change after qualifying will automatically send the driver to the back of the grid.


Aerodynamics

Rear wing limited to two elements (instead of three) with the vertical parts of the wing (the end-plates) and the engine covers increased in size to allow more space for sponsorship.

Williams technical director Patrick Head estimates that this change has reduced his car's aerodynamic downforce by between three and four percent.

But he added: "Usually one's progress over the winter is considerably more than that amount. So had that not happened then the cars would be going even quicker still."


Speed Limits

Pit lane limits raised from 80 kph to 100 kph. This should change race strategy at some circuits, with teams able to make quicker pit stops.

Electronics

So-called 'launch control' is banned along with automatic gearboxes. Drivers can no longer rely on computerised electronic systems to get them off the starting grid quickly and cleanly.

Weekend Schedule

A two-hour private test session on Friday mornings has been scrapped.

Friday is now devoted exclusively to free practice, with two hour-long sessions and all but the top four teams in the 2003 championship are allowed to run a third car in whatever livery they choose.

Any driver of a third car on Friday must not have competed in more than six grands prix over the previous two years.

Qualifying takes place in one two-part session of 90 minutes on Saturday instead of an hour each on Friday and Saturday.

Drivers start the first part in the order that they finished the previous race, with the winner first, rather than in championship order.

Ferrari's Brazilian Rubens Barrichello, winner of 2003's season-ending Japanese Grand Prix, will therefore be first on track in qualifying for Australia.

Any car that stops on the circuit in the first part cannot start the second, when the finishing order from the first part is reversed, but goes to the back of the grid instead.

Some drivers could have as little as two minutes between ending their first timed lap and having to start their second if they are first to retire in a race and then slowest in the initial qualifying.

A small team such as Minardi who would normally fill the back row of the grid may opt to start the race with new engines since they will have nothing to lose in terms of position but something to gain in performance.

Incorrigible

13,668 posts

263 months

Tuesday 2nd March 2004
quotequote all
Well at least that's straight forward then

RichB

51,873 posts

286 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2004
quotequote all
OK here's a controversial way to revive interest in F1.

i) There are no rules - F1 goes back to being the pinnacle of racing technology.

Stop as many times as you want to re-fuel, if at all. Use whatever tyres you want, whatever wings and aerodynamic aids you want, whatever engine you want etc. Not until we do that will we ever see the innovation of people like Colin Chapman again.

I know you have to have some rules but you get my drift?

Rich...

minghis

Original Poster:

1,570 posts

253 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2004
quotequote all
RichB said:
OK here's a controversial way to revive interest in F1.

i) There are no rules - F1 goes back to being the pinnacle of racing technology.

Stop as many times as you want to re-fuel, if at all. Use whatever tyres you want, whatever wings and aerodynamic aids you want, whatever engine you want etc. Not until we do that will we ever see the innovation of people like Colin Chapman again.

I know you have to have some rules but you get my drift?


Rich...


Hey....Wacky Races!!

FourWheelDrift

88,778 posts

286 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2004
quotequote all
Yes but with those rules this is what next years Ferrari would like.

RichB

51,873 posts

286 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2004
quotequote all
...and what is wrong with that?

ace-t

7,722 posts

257 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2004
quotequote all
Cool!

Ace-T

yiw1393

23,018 posts

263 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2004
quotequote all
Why not one rule - BHP is limited to 850, measured on a sealed calibrated dynothingy for every car at the end of the race?

Frik

13,544 posts

245 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2004
quotequote all
yiw1393 said:
Why not one rule - BHP is limited to 850, measured on a sealed calibrated dynothingy for every car at the end of the race?


I'm not sure that would be that easy to impliment. However, forcing the engine to breath through a restrictor often does the job. If you can only get so much air in the engine, you can only get so much power out.

I doubt this'd make the teams very even though.

RichB

51,873 posts

286 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
yiw1393 said:
Why not one rule - BHP is limited to 850, measured on a sealed calibrated dynothingy for every car at the end of the race?
But why would you want to limit power? Let the teams get as much as possible? Speed will be limited by the size of the driver's balls. R...

FourWheelDrift

88,778 posts

286 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
RichB said:

Speed will be limited by the size of the driver's balls. R...


What you mean by aerodynamic drag?