Farage in Plane Crash
Author
Discussion

lebox

Original Poster:

4,456 posts

269 months

jains15

1,013 posts

203 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
lebox said:
He's gonna be fine, taken to hospital. It would be ironic if said hospital is staffed by Eastern European immigrants hippy

Stig

11,823 posts

314 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
FFS - the BBC, muppets:

"The aircraft, believed to be a biplane, had flown into the airfield from Winchester area and was taking off again when the accident happened, the spokesman said. "

And yet there is a video of.... a single wing!

Gun

13,432 posts

248 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Just seen this on the news, lets hope he makes a speedy recovery, we need someone to start ripping into the other parties when the hung Parliament starts.

Gun

13,432 posts

248 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
jains15 said:
lebox said:
He's gonna be fine, taken to hospital. It would be ironic if said hospital is staffed by Eastern European immigrants hippy
He's been taken to an NHS hospital so it's bound to be!

Andy Zarse

10,870 posts

277 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Whoever I vote for, it's the kiss of death I tell you!

tank slapper

7,949 posts

313 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Stig said:
FFS - the BBC, muppets:

"The aircraft, believed to be a biplane, had flown into the airfield from Winchester area and was taking off again when the accident happened, the spokesman said. "

And yet there is a video of.... a single wing!
Yes, lazy journalism as usual. It takes a matter of seconds to look up the registration and discover that the aircraft is a PZL-104, which is a high-wing monoplane.

Mr Gearchange

5,892 posts

236 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Yes becuase the real newsworthy item is what sort of plane it was. Not the fact that it crashed or who was in it.

Eric Mc

125,754 posts

295 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
The plane involved is a PZL 104 Wilga (G-BWDF). Definitely NOT a biplane.



These are quite powerful Polish built lioght aircraft which is why they are popular for banner towing or glider towing.

I saw the fatal crash of one of these at an Irish airshow in 1984. The front end of the plane is quite spindly and in the Irish crash the heavy radial engine came back into the cockpit - crushing the puilot. The views of the wreckage of Farage's plane seem to show the same type of damage.

He is am extremely lucky chap to have survived this.



Edited by Eric Mc on Thursday 6th May 11:45

tank slapper

7,949 posts

313 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Mr Gearchange said:
Yes becuase the real newsworthy item is what sort of plane it was. Not the fact that it crashed or who was in it.
That's beside the point. If something is to be reported it should be factually correct, not a guess. It's a cop out to say 'believed to be' when it is a trivial matter to check the details that are readily available.

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

263 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
These are quite powerful Polish built light aircraft...
Irony.

Mr Gearchange

5,892 posts

236 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
But it matters not one iota other than to plane geeks who want to point out how their knowledge of planes is superior to that of a BBC news reporter.

It's completely immaterial to the news story.

Eric Mc

125,754 posts

295 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Rude-boy said:
Eric Mc said:
These are quite powerful Polish built light aircraft...
Irony.
In what way?

Here's the aircarft that I saw crash back in 1984. In fact, this picture was taken just minutes before it came down -



And the aftermath -



jains15

1,013 posts

203 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Rude-boy said:
Eric Mc said:
These are quite powerful Polish built light aircraft...
Irony.
You couldn't make it up

Eric Mc

125,754 posts

295 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Mr Gearchange said:
But it matters not one iota other than to plane geeks who want to point out how their knowledge of planes is superior to that of a BBC news reporter.

It's completely immaterial to the news story.
Absolute nonsense.

Is there not an onus on reporters to find out the FACTS as best they can before committing to their report?

If they are sloppy in one area, it leads one to believe they are sloppy in others too.

I look on errors such as this an indicator of poor journalistic standards, not inferior knowledge of a particular subject.

CobolMan

1,432 posts

237 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Mr Gearchange said:
But it matters not one iota other than to plane geeks who want to point out how their knowledge of planes is superior to that of a BBC news reporter.

It's completely immaterial to the news story.
But, if they can't get the facts right, what credence can you put on the rest of their reporting?

dr_gn

16,976 posts

214 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Rude-boy said:
Eric Mc said:
These are quite powerful Polish built light aircraft...
Irony.
In what way?

Here's the aircarft that I saw crash back in 1984. In fact, this picture was taken just minutes before it came down -



And the aftermath -


Ironic because he's a UKIP candidate spazzing around in an Eastern European aircraft. Maybe he did it to prove a point about foreign products.

Skii

1,979 posts

221 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Stig said:
FFS - the BBC, muppets:

"The aircraft, believed to be a biplane, had flown into the airfield from Winchester area and was taking off again when the accident happened, the spokesman said. "

And yet there is a video of.... a single wing!
They also can't tell the difference between a C-17 and a Hercules transport.

john_p

7,073 posts

280 months

Thursday 6th May 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Hmm, I wonder if that's an ASW-19 or a Pegase. Or something else.