PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
Author
Discussion

uk_vette

Original Poster:

3,336 posts

234 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Can it work, ?

Is it a more fair way of ensuring the person in number 10, is the person, most people voted for ?


I don't really understand, it except much than it gives each person 1 vote at which leader they want in at number 10.

The way I see it now, even if you have fewer of the population voting for you, you can still get to number 10, by virtue of the way the constituencies are made up and divided

'vette

Edited by uk_vette on Friday 7th May 10:25


Edited by uk_vette on Friday 7th May 14:08

cs02rm0

13,958 posts

221 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Not if it's implemented like the BBC's 'proportional' map. Otherwise, I think so.

Davi

17,153 posts

250 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
uk_vette said:
The way I see it now, even if you have fewer of the population voting for you, you can still get to number 10, by virtue of the way the constiuencies are made up and divided
Party Seats Gain Loss Net Votes % +/-%
Conservative 291 95 3 +92 10,213,492 36.0 +3.9
Labour 251 2 89 -87 8,307,487 29.3 -6.3
Liberal Democrat 52 8 13 -5 6,481,602 22.9 +1.0


Think this sums up our current system nicely. It sucks, big time, it needs radical overhaul, will it happen? Doubt it.

Edited by Davi on Friday 7th May 11:41

Bee_Jay

2,599 posts

278 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Well, the last time any party got more than 50% was back in 1931. So if you are asking for PR, then you are asking for the kind of uncertainty we have right now in perpetuity...

However, Cameron PM, Cable Chancellor, Clegg Home Secretary sounds quite good to me...

SJobson

13,851 posts

294 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
STV is the only viable way, surely? With more than two parties the split of the vote means you're never going to have a majority.

Bee_Jay

2,599 posts

278 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
STV does sound sensible.

Andy Zarse

10,870 posts

277 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Bee_Jay said:
Well, the last time any party got more than 50% was back in 1931. So if you are asking for PR, then you are asking for the kind of uncertainty we have right now in perpetuity...

However, Cameron PM, Cable Janitor, Clegg Home Secretary sounds quite good to me...
EFA

elster

17,517 posts

240 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Bee_Jay said:
Well, the last time any party got more than 50% was back in 1931. So if you are asking for PR, then you are asking for the kind of uncertainty we have right now in perpetuity...

However, Cameron PM, Cable Chancellor, Clegg Home Secretary sounds quite good to me...
With a coalition there is a 0% chance of Vince being Chancellor.

F i F

48,815 posts

281 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Davi said:
uk_vette said:
The way I see it now, even if you have fewer of the population voting for you, you can still get to number 10, by virtue of the way the constiuencies are made up and divided
Party Seats Gain Loss Net Votes % +/-%
Conservative 291 95 3 +92 10,213,492 36.0 +3.9
Labour 251 2 89 -87 8,307,487 29.3 -6.3
Liberal Democrat 52 8 13 -5 6,481,602 22.9 +1.0


Think this sums up our current system nicely. It sucks, big time, it needs radical overhaul, will it happen? Doubt it.
Sorry to suggest somebody else doing some work, but it would be good to see that table updated with other parties. Ignore the loonies but include parties who might have enough of a vote count to get close to one seat and see how the House might be split up then.

Is there an analysis like that on any of the websites?

Mr E

23,076 posts

289 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
F i F said:
Is there an analysis like that on any of the websites?
Back of fag paper calculations based on the vote distribution, straight PR and 650 seats gives UKIP 19-20 seats and the BNP 13 seats I think.

elster

17,517 posts

240 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
F i F said:
Davi said:
uk_vette said:
The way I see it now, even if you have fewer of the population voting for you, you can still get to number 10, by virtue of the way the constiuencies are made up and divided
Party Seats Gain Loss Net Votes % +/-%
Conservative 291 95 3 +92 10,213,492 36.0 +3.9
Labour 251 2 89 -87 8,307,487 29.3 -6.3
Liberal Democrat 52 8 13 -5 6,481,602 22.9 +1.0


Think this sums up our current system nicely. It sucks, big time, it needs radical overhaul, will it happen? Doubt it.
Sorry to suggest somebody else doing some work, but it would be good to see that table updated with other parties. Ignore the loonies but include parties who might have enough of a vote count to get close to one seat and see how the House might be split up then.

Is there an analysis like that on any of the websites?
There you go

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/result...

Davi

17,153 posts

250 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Party Seats Gain Loss Net Votes % +/-%
Conservative 291 95 3 +92 10,213,492 36.0 +3.9
Labour 251 2 89 -87 8,307,487 29.3 -6.3
Liberal Democrat 52 8 13 -5 6,481,602 22.9 +1.0
Democratic Unionist Party 8 0 1 -1 168,216 0.6 -0.3
Scottish National Party 6 0 0 0 482,823 1.7 +0.1
Sinn Fein 4 0 0 0 150,638 0.5 -0.1
Plaid Cymru 3 1 0 +1 165,394 0.6 -0.1
Social Democratic & Labour Party 3 0 0 0 107,396 0.4 -0.1
Green 1 1 0 +1 269,866 1.0 -0.1
Alliance Party 1 1 0 +1 42,325 0.1 +0.0
UK Independence Party 0 0 0 0 871,958 3.1 +0.8
British National Party 0 0 0 0 542,387 1.9 +1.2
Ulster Conservatives and Unionists - New Force 0 0 1 -1 102,361 0.4 -0.1
English Democrats 0 0 0 0 64,499 0.2 +0.2
Traditional Unionist Voice 0 0 0 0 26,300 0.1
Respect-Unity Coalition 0 0 0 0 24,719 0.1 -0.1
Christian Party 0 0 0 0 17,261 0.1
Independent Community and Health Concern 0 0 1 -1 16,150 0.1 +0.0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition 0 0 0 0 12,275 0.0
Scottish Socialist Party 0 0 0 0 3,157 0.0 -0.2
Others 1 1 1 0 271,080 1.0 -0.2
Turnout 28,341,386 65.0 4.0


There you go FiF...

or you can look here for updates hehe

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/result...

Halb

53,012 posts

213 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
uk_vette said:
Can it work, ?
Yes. A 2nd chamber made up of PR.

FourWheelDrift

92,323 posts

314 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Blair won previous election with less support if the above percentages are correct.

2005 - 35.2%

Edited by FourWheelDrift on Friday 7th May 12:32

carreauchompeur

18,323 posts

234 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Am glad to see that the BNP achieved no seats, however it's a little worrying that 542,387 people voted for them. Obviously the respectable veneer is working...

F i F

48,815 posts

281 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Thanks chaps so would it look like this based on current situation ie only 621 seats declared.

Party FPTP PR
Conservative 291 224
Labour 251 182
Liberal Democrat 52 142
Democratic Unionist Party 8 4
Scottish National Party 6 11
Sinn Fein 4 3
Plaid Cymru 3 4
Social Democratic & Labour Party 3 2
Green 1 6
Alliance Party 1 1
UK Independence Party 0 19
British National Party 0 12
Ulster Conservatives and Unionists - New Force 0 2
English Democrats 0 1
Traditional Unionist Voice 0 1
Respect-Unity Coalition 0 1
Christian Party 0 0
Independent Community and Health Concern 0 0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition 0 0
Scottish Socialist Party 0 0
Others 1 6
Total 621 621


Of course this may be utter tosh and simple PR may not work like that.
The phrase "like herding cats" comes to mind.

Yeast Lord

329 posts

199 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Greece has PR and they've done well for themselves haven't they lol. More complex bureaucratic processes is just what we need in a time when we need to cut costs. Cut the waste and brown's head off I say lol.

Russ35

2,706 posts

269 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Under PR who would each MP represent? If I have an issue who would I go to?

I currently know that I would contact my MP, Mark Menzies (Fylde).

WEHGuy

1,347 posts

203 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
F i F said:
Thanks chaps so would it look like this based on current situation ie only 621 seats declared.

Party FPTP PR
Conservative 291 224
Labour 251 182
Liberal Democrat 52 142
Democratic Unionist Party 8 4
Scottish National Party 6 11
Sinn Fein 4 3
Plaid Cymru 3 4
Social Democratic & Labour Party 3 2
Green 1 6
Alliance Party 1 1
UK Independence Party 0 19
British National Party 0 12
Ulster Conservatives and Unionists - New Force 0 2
English Democrats 0 1
Traditional Unionist Voice 0 1
Respect-Unity Coalition 0 1
Christian Party 0 0
Independent Community and Health Concern 0 0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition 0 0
Scottish Socialist Party 0 0
Others 1 6
Total 621 621


Of course this may be utter tosh and simple PR may not work like that.
The phrase "like herding cats" comes to mind.
The smaller parties would probably get more votes aswell because people wouldn't think they were a wasted vote

Size Nine Elm

5,167 posts

314 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
And more to the point, given that in each constituencies a number of people stand for office, why should a vote for one person in one constituency result in another person miles away being elected?

Ah yes, because they wear the same colour of tie...

So what happens to all the independent votes - do they club together and choose which 'independent' should be elected by PR?