MGR’s surviving test cars are finally sent to the crusher
MGR’s surviving test cars are finally sent to the crusher
Author
Discussion

Benjybh

Original Poster:

1,937 posts

209 months

Wednesday 19th May 2010
quotequote all
Seems a shame really. I know that all you Rover haters are going to post messages of rejoice, but it's sad that the last remnants of the UK's once-proud volume car production industry are gone for good. frown

Linky



Edited by Benjybh on Wednesday 19th May 20:04

RetroCosworth

7,211 posts

234 months

Wednesday 19th May 2010
quotequote all
bds!

Dift

1,687 posts

257 months

Wednesday 19th May 2010
quotequote all
By all accounts, there was a 4wd V8 ZT, thats now gone to the crusher. It is a real shame... But unfortunatley it was always going to happen. I would of happily gave them a few hundred quid for the V8 ZT and a TF.

EDLT

15,421 posts

236 months

Wednesday 19th May 2010
quotequote all
Most manufacturers crush prototypes, not really news is it?

BrewsterBear

1,548 posts

222 months

Wednesday 19th May 2010
quotequote all
  • NEWSFLASH*
Chinese people involved in ruthless and needless destruction.

And in other news scientists have proved that bald men spend less on hair gel.

glazbagun

15,376 posts

227 months

Wednesday 19th May 2010
quotequote all
EDLT said:
Most manufacturers crush prototypes, not really news is it?
+1. A bit sad seeing as MGR is dead these days, but still common practice & I'm surprised they lasted so long.

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 19th May 2010
quotequote all
I'm suprised manufacturers don't try to auction off some of these working prototypes, bound to be some people out there that will pay for the uniqueness, even if they don't have all the bells and whistles.

theironduke

6,995 posts

218 months

Wednesday 19th May 2010
quotequote all
Symbolica said:
I'm suprised manufacturers don't try to auction off some of these working prototypes, bound to be some people out there that will pay for the uniqueness, even if they don't have all the bells and whistles.
Is it really worth the hassle though from the Chinese perspective? what's a few thousand pounds to them at the end of the day?

MX7

7,902 posts

204 months

Wednesday 19th May 2010
quotequote all
Sort of funny that their HQ got called the Kremlin. Red Robbo must have been delighted.

Mr.Jimbo

2,084 posts

213 months

Wednesday 19th May 2010
quotequote all
Hmm, I probably worked on a few of those SAIC cars.

I agree, I don't like things being pointlessly destroyed, though to be fair you're not going to get much use out of these.

Doubt many people would want to buy them after the interiors are removed and often cut/modified to fit datalogging gear etc.

niva441

2,172 posts

261 months

Wednesday 19th May 2010
quotequote all
theironduke said:
Symbolica said:
I'm suprised manufacturers don't try to auction off some of these working prototypes, bound to be some people out there that will pay for the uniqueness, even if they don't have all the bells and whistles.
Is it really worth the hassle though from the Chinese perspective? what's a few thousand pounds to them at the end of the day?
I think the tax due on the value of the prototype parts is more of a problem.

redgriff500

28,982 posts

293 months

Thursday 20th May 2010
quotequote all
They tend to crush prototypes because of legal issues.

Either because they are worried about being sued if something goes wrong or because they 'bent' various regs when registering it.

P9

15,169 posts

264 months

Thursday 20th May 2010
quotequote all
redgriff500 said:
They tend to crush prototypes because of legal issues.

Either because they are worried about being sued if something goes wrong or because they 'bent' various regs when registering it.
yes

Prototype components used and not subject to type approval.

In other words a legal nightmare!

Still a shame they can't go to a modern museum instead or a collection where they are never driven on the roads.

Jayho

2,428 posts

200 months

Thursday 20th May 2010
quotequote all
I remember a while back there was something kicking about in the classifieds or fleebay or something, was effectively a Rover 200/25 modded to look like a MG ZR, basically a car built of other cars for no reason, and claimed as a prototype which made it from long bridge.... think the claimed some ridiculous power and engine bay mods... but looked like a whole load of baloney.

glazbagun

15,376 posts

227 months

Thursday 20th May 2010
quotequote all
There was an old Evo opinion piece where the dude mentioned things liek brand new Rover 75 V8's with boggo spec and 130,000 miles on the clock that were obviously endurance test cars, as well as all kinds of "what if we..." combinations. Shame I don't have em with me.

williamp

20,440 posts

303 months

Thursday 20th May 2010
quotequote all
its really sad I know, but its standard practcie to destory prototypes.

Have a look here:

http://www.astonmartins.com/vanquish/vanquish_prot...

which shows crash test Astons plus prototypes. They were kept for the duration of production, and then scrapped


Engineer1

10,486 posts

239 months

Thursday 20th May 2010
quotequote all
Selling off old prototypes would be suicide for the company involved, the legal implications and shear ball ache of keeping them on the road would be immense would you be happy buying a car where the driveshafts where one offs or modified from someone else, also people may twig any dodgy parts bin borrowing.