Replacement 2nd Lense for Canon Digi SLR for wedding use...
Replacement 2nd Lense for Canon Digi SLR for wedding use...
Author
Discussion

neil_bolton

Original Poster:

17,113 posts

294 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
Eeup all,

Need a replacement lense for my 350D, 2nd hand, that I can use as a general use all round lense. It would also need to be ideal for a wedding type use but in the hands of anyone who has it.

Does anyone have any suggestions? My Sigma 28-300 gave up the ghost, prefering to go freestyle instead of the mechanism for winding in and out working like it should frown

Any good 2nd sites, or suggestions as to where to get one would be gratefully recieved.

Gold

1,998 posts

235 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
Budget?

neil_bolton

Original Poster:

17,113 posts

294 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
Ah yes. Um. Guess up to about £100? Will that be enough for something nice?

andy-xr

13,204 posts

234 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
50mm 1.8 is looking the winner I guess

JulianHJ

8,868 posts

292 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
andy-xr said:
50mm 1.8 is looking the winner I guess
Oh yes

Makes a great portrait lens for that kind of cash. Check camerapricebuster.co.uk for the cheapest supplier (Currently about £88) or look on fleabay for a Mk1 version which has a nicer build quality.

crmcatee

5,806 posts

257 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
Sorry - pet hate of mine.

It's lens NOT lense.

Lucas CAV

3,068 posts

249 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
crmcatee said:
Sorry - pet hate of mine.

It's lens NOT lense.
pet hate of mine - pedantic people making a fuss about stuff like this.

please go away to spellingheads or something


Simpo Two

92,807 posts

295 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
Lucas CAV said:
pet hate of mine - people trying to help me get things right so I can pass on correct information to my children
EFA

Apart from the 50mm lens, 'cheap all-round £100' and 'wedding use' don't sit too well together.



Edited by Simpo Two on Monday 24th May 10:04

crmcatee

5,806 posts

257 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
Lucas CAV said:
pet hate of mine - pedantic people making a fuss about stuff like this.

please go away to spellingheads or something
You need a full stop at the end of that last sentence. smile

neil_bolton

Original Poster:

17,113 posts

294 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
Sorry. Lens. I must write out 'I must not speel Lens Lense' 100 times.

I'm a simpleton when it comes to technical stuff on my cameras - I just want something that someone can pick up, focus, and snap something that'll look reasonably good...

TooLateForAName

4,930 posts

214 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
What do you mean by wedding use?

Shots in the church? posed pics before or after? party shots?

The usual issue is the lens needing to be very fast because of the low light. The only low light lens you'll get for under 100 is the 50mm 1.8. How useful that focal length will be for you is another question.

neil_bolton

Original Poster:

17,113 posts

294 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
TooLateForAName said:
What do you mean by wedding use?

Shots in the church? posed pics before or after? party shots?

The usual issue is the lens needing to be very fast because of the low light. The only low light lens you'll get for under 100 is the 50mm 1.8. How useful that focal length will be for you is another question.
Outside, and in a marquee. maybe a bit in a church hall, but all usually pretty good light.

Simpo Two

92,807 posts

295 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
You might be better off sticking with a 'one size fits all' lens and buying a stonking flashgun instead. If money is tight there's always s/h from eBay.

When I started doing weddings and only had 'average' kit (ie D70 and 18-70/70-300 lenses) my shopping list was, in order of need:

1) Stonking flashgun - you can make a powerful flash dimmer but you can't make a dim flash brighter
2) Fast telephoto (70-200 f2.8) because in low light the 70-300 unuseable due to hunting
3) Fast wideangle (17-55 f2.8)

I also have a clever flash cord with extra AF illuminator (supplements the one in the flash) so I can focus accurately and shoot in total darkness if I have too!

I prefer zooms because I can instantly frame/compose. Others may/will have their own way of doing things and have different kit priorities of course.

Edited by Simpo Two on Monday 24th May 13:57

Starfighter

5,347 posts

208 months

Monday 24th May 2010
quotequote all
At that money the only sensible choice is a 50mm F1.8. There is a Mk1 at www.mifsuds.co.uk at the moment for £89. These are better than the Mk2 for optics and have a metal mount. The next choice would be a 35mm prime but those are over the budget. A friend in the US shoots weddings and similar events and he often just uses a 50mm.

Zooms will give you some flexibility over cropping and angles byt they will cost you with light gathering, sharpness and CA and will distort significantly at either end of the zoom range. My zoom of choice for weddings is a 24-105 F4 but that will set you back £700 used and over £800 new but you do get what you pay for.

neil_bolton

Original Poster:

17,113 posts

294 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
Starfighter said:
At that money the only sensible choice is a 50mm F1.8. There is a Mk1 at www.mifsuds.co.uk at the moment for £89. These are better than the Mk2 for optics and have a metal mount. The next choice would be a 35mm prime but those are over the budget. A friend in the US shoots weddings and similar events and he often just uses a 50mm.

Zooms will give you some flexibility over cropping and angles byt they will cost you with light gathering, sharpness and CA and will distort significantly at either end of the zoom range. My zoom of choice for weddings is a 24-105 F4 but that will set you back £700 used and over £800 new but you do get what you pay for.
Thanks - going to grab the lens from Mifsuds and start experimenting with it. A flash might be next on the list thumbup

Starfighter

5,347 posts

208 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
I hope you like it.

The angle of view will allow you to do some nice small group portrate type shots without having to get too close. This can be great for candids at receptions etc and from personal experience I know that most pro togs don't do this but the bride and groom love the personal touch it adds to a picture collection.

Simpo Two

92,807 posts

295 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
Starfighter said:
portrate type shots
New word for a 'prostrate portrait'?!

agent006

12,058 posts

294 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
crmcatee said:
Sorry - pet hate of mine.

It's lens NOT lense.
Some of us use lense on purpose to annoy certain posters here. You've now got onto the list.

Fordo

1,572 posts

254 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
crmcatee said:
Lucas CAV said:
pet hate of mine - pedantic people making a fuss about stuff like this.

please go away to spellingheads or something
You need a full stop at the end of that last sentence. smile
Could also do with capital letters at the start of the sentences. smile

Zad

13,008 posts

266 months

Thursday 27th May 2010
quotequote all
agent006 said:
crmcatee said:
Sorry - pet hate of mine.

It's lens NOT lense.
Some of us use lense on purpose to annoy certain posters here. You've now got onto the list.
Has the hot weather raised the testosterone levels or something? Even the normally gentlemanly sub-forums like this seem to have become cock size comparisons and top-dog fights.