M5 with "Press Preparation"
M5 with "Press Preparation"
Author
Discussion

Skrambles

Original Poster:

1,357 posts

288 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
There's an e60 m5 for sale on the AUC website which lists "press preparation" as part of the spec. The car has only done a few thousand miles and is an 09. Does the press prep mean it will definitely have been ragged?

Yelly

306 posts

192 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
Yes.

Skrambles

Original Poster:

1,357 posts

288 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
Ok then, best to steer clear. I think it was the car used to compare the m5 with the XFR and possibly the monster audi q7 v12

JMRS4

2,388 posts

222 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
Skrambles said:
There's an e60 m5 for sale on the AUC website which lists "press preparation" as part of the spec. The car has only done a few thousand miles and is an 09. Does the press prep mean it will definitely have been ragged?
Had the boll*cks thrashed off it.tongue out;)

Vroomer

1,880 posts

204 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
It's always puzzled me why BMW list 'Press preparation' on the AUC site, given it's likely to deter a lot of people.

Presumably they're doing it as a matter of policy to be seen to be 'whiter than white' and avoid potential comebacks.

berry100

991 posts

234 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
Still under full warranty though isn't it, so what's the issue? Maybe I'm being naive....

rash_decision

1,412 posts

201 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
It's an M5, what's the problem with it being driven hard? If you are worried about driving a car of such a nature hard, buy a 520d M Sport, that's better suited to the Asda or Sainsburys trips!!

And as previously said, it's coming through BMW AUC so under full warranty, and I'm sure if they had any issues with the car they would have shifted it on through the trade rather than market it themselves.

Vroomer

1,880 posts

204 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
berry100 said:
Still under full warranty though isn't it, so what's the issue? Maybe I'm being naive....
Have you ever watched Top Gear?

Skrambles

Original Poster:

1,357 posts

288 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
rash_decision said:
It's an M5, what's the problem with it being driven hard? If you are worried about driving a car of such a nature hard, buy a 520d M Sport, that's better suited to the Asda or Sainsburys trips!!

And as previously said, it's coming through BMW AUC so under full warranty, and I'm sure if they had any issues with the car they would have shifted it on through the trade rather than market it themselves.
Nothing wrong with a car being driven hard every now and again, but if the only purpose behind buying the car was to push it to the limit repeatedly in tests against other cars, that is a worry. And if bought with no intention of using it privately, then what kind of treatment/care will it have had even off the track?

How does having a "full" AUC warranty help when BMW considers that components have failed for alleged "abuse" or "wear and tear"?

physprof

996 posts

211 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
rash_decision said:
a 520d M Sport.
now that will be a car that has been thrashed like crazy by a frustrated rep in the belief that the M designation has imbued the car with supercar like pace wink

M3RMS

1,167 posts

237 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
Each to their own, but i personally wouldn't bother me.

Car get's driven as it was specificaly built for? Fine with me.

Vroomer

1,880 posts

204 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
They weren't built for 'Sideways Challenge' and doughnutting!

M3RMS

1,167 posts

237 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
Vroomer said:
They weren't built for 'Sideways Challenge' and doughnutting!
I did the Porsche Car Control course over at Silverstone a few months back..... And as we spent the whole time doing precisely that, I'd beg to differ!!


Vroomer

1,880 posts

204 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
Controlled conditions with someone in the jumpseat to moderate you.



Quite different from unsupervised hooligan journalists with no respect for a car thrashing the guts out of it!

Skrambles

Original Poster:

1,357 posts

288 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
M3RMS said:
Each to their own, but i personally wouldn't bother me.

Car get's driven as it was specificaly built for? Fine with me.
Presumably you'd expect a chunky discount tho', if told it had been a press car.

philmots

4,661 posts

284 months

Wednesday 26th May 2010
quotequote all
I wouldn't have it, specially when i could easily get a similar car which hadn't spent it's early years with the press!

Brewsters

651 posts

193 months

Thursday 27th May 2010
quotequote all
What a bunch of poofs. It's an M5 ffs - made to be driven like it was stolen.


alock

4,486 posts

235 months

Thursday 27th May 2010
quotequote all
Read Jeremy Clarkson's experiences with buying an ex-press car:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/driving/jeremy_cl...

Brewsters

651 posts

193 months

Thursday 27th May 2010
quotequote all
alock said:
Read Jeremy Clarkson's experiences with buying an ex-press car:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/driving/jeremy_cl...
And???!!! read and it has absolutely nothing to with this topic!!

mat205125

17,790 posts

237 months

Thursday 27th May 2010
quotequote all
Do "Press Prep" cars fetch less money than a similarly equipped (i.e. everything ticked) car?

Is the paint finish appreciably better than the standard modern BMW Hammerite embarasment?

Has a warranty claim on a "Press Prep" car ever been refused on the basis that "the computer shows that in 2009 it performed 10 launch control starts and x hours on track in shift speed one million mode"