So I have been thinking.... its time too...
So I have been thinking.... its time too...
Author
Discussion

Petrol Only

Original Poster:

1,611 posts

198 months

Friday 4th June 2010
quotequote all
Join the MX5 famiy, well maybe.

Currently drive a Gen 7 T Sport Celica so the hairdresser look is fine for me wink.

However id be chopping it in and the 5 would be my daily drive. I (we) don't need four seats. Friends and family (not kids fk that) need them more than us.

Were thinking of using it as a bit of a "training tool" before we step into the world of Lotus. As we have never owned RWD before.

Woud be looking to keep it for a year or more i guess.

My questions which 5 for the right side of 4k?
1.6 1.8?
Can the two of us no kids REALLY live with just a 5?
What about a MR2 or other suggestions?
Am i going to miss the power of the 190 BHP celica?


Your witty banter and excellent advice is appreciated as usual.

snotrag

15,472 posts

234 months

Friday 4th June 2010
quotequote all
Can the two of us no kids REALLY live with just a 5?

Yes, probably. A weeks shopping will go in no sweat. Boot is big enough for a weekend away. How often do you really NEED your back seats? If you buy a new telly, Currys or whoever will deliver it to your door in a van. Dont worry!


What about a MR2 or other suggestions?

Pound in the box over there please (only joking).

Am i going to miss the power of the 190 BHP celica?.

No. People get caught up on this power thing too much. MX5's arent slow. They arent Fast, for sure, but they arent slow. A quick google shows that the Gen 7 Celica probably weighs upwards of 1400kg. Power to weight is probably actually better in most MX5s in that case.

Petrol Only

Original Poster:

1,611 posts

198 months

Friday 4th June 2010
quotequote all
snotrag][b said:
Am i going to miss the power of the 190 BHP celica?.

No. People get caught up on this power thing too much. MX5's arent slow. They arent Fast, for sure, but they arent slow. A quick google shows that the Gen 7 Celica probably weighs upwards of 1400kg. Power to weight is probably actually better in most MX5s in that case.
Simlar style engines having to rev the nuts of them. However it is much harder to rag the nuts out of the celica than the 5's i have driven. Gearbox is ste in the celica in comparison .

Edited by Petrol Only on Friday 4th June 09:43

tuttle

3,427 posts

260 months

Friday 4th June 2010
quotequote all
Hmmmm scratchchin Me thinks, if your long term goal is a lotus, an MX5 is a great introduction into RWD. Not at all scary & very controllable, even in the wet but with just enough power to keep things interesting at roundabouts etc.

They are pretty hard wearing & reliable. Simple engine & relatively cheap for spares. Size, as said above is not really an issue once you get used to it, perhaps a bit more space in a Mk2? For your budget I'd be looking at a late Mk1 1.8~ actually for £4k probably an FI'ed one evil

Edited by tuttle on Friday 4th June 10:18

ironictwist

7,127 posts

228 months

Friday 4th June 2010
quotequote all
tuttle said:
Hmmmm scratchchin Me thinks, if your long term goal is a lotus, an MX5 is a great introduction into RWD. Not at all scary & very controllable, even in the wet but with just enough power to keep things interesting at roundabouts etc.

They are pretty hard wearing & reliable. Simple engine & relatively cheap for spares. Size, as said above is not really an issue once you get used to it, perhaps a bit more space in a Mk2? For your budget I'd be looking at a late Mk1 1.8~ actually for £4k probably an FI'ed one evil

Edited by tuttle on Friday 4th June 10:18
What he said ^

Jonny671

29,758 posts

212 months

Friday 4th June 2010
quotequote all
ironictwist said:
tuttle said:
Hmmmm scratchchin Me thinks, if your long term goal is a lotus, an MX5 is a great introduction into RWD. Not at all scary & very controllable, even in the wet but with just enough power to keep things interesting at roundabouts etc.

They are pretty hard wearing & reliable. Simple engine & relatively cheap for spares. Size, as said above is not really an issue once you get used to it, perhaps a bit more space in a Mk2? For your budget I'd be looking at a late Mk1 1.8~ actually for £4k probably an FI'ed one evil

Edited by tuttle on Friday 4th June 10:18
What he said ^
What he said ^

An FI one though would get you quite abit more power straight away.

I probably would go with the MK1, I prefer the interior of the MK2 though..

mikey P 500

1,243 posts

210 months

Friday 4th June 2010
quotequote all
You will not need to spend all your 4k unless you really want to. £2k will get you a nice mk1 to learn rear wheel drive in. Then use the spare £2k to add forced induction once you have got your confidence up on the basic set up. An early 1.6 is almost as quick as the 1.8s so just buy the best car you can find for your cash (avoid rust everything else is cheap to fix).
They are a very easy car to drive (I went the other way Elise first then a mx5) very easy to drive and more for giving than an Elise type car. Also a lot more practical to use as an everyday car.

Risotto

3,933 posts

235 months

Friday 4th June 2010
quotequote all
Having previously owned a number of MX-5s, I decided to try a mildly uprated S2 Elise as a daily driver. The MX5 was a better thought-out design but also softer and slower than the Elise. At lower speeds I have to say the MX5 could be just as much fun, maybe more; although the Elise comes into its own on track.

Overall, it's difficult to compare the two - they don't have much in common. The Elise always looked and felt more special and was dynamically the better car but it was clear they'd developed it on a shoestring - they couldn't even get basic technology like wind-up windows to work reliably. The MX-5 benefits from a comparatively huge development budget and is more exploitable at lower speeds. Both very good cars but for different reasons.

In terms of my experiences with the Elise, it was a mixed bag. You can use an Elise every day; whether you should depends on the sort of person you are. If you only use an Elise occasionally, you may be willing to overlook some of the shortcomings - you need to ask yourself if that would be the case if it was your only car.



Edited by Risotto on Thursday 28th July 13:04

Petrol Only

Original Poster:

1,611 posts

198 months

Saturday 5th June 2010
quotequote all
So supercharged 5's what are my extra running costs going to be?
Insurance?
How much quicker is say this...

http://pistonheads.com/sales/1538092.htm

Jonny671

29,758 posts

212 months

Saturday 5th June 2010
quotequote all
Petrol Only said:
So supercharged 5's what are my extra running costs going to be?
Insurance?
How much quicker is say this...

http://pistonheads.com/sales/1538092.htm
If it is 200bhp, alot.

My 1.8iS has 140bhp IIRC and is fast enough for the roads the MX5 excels in, so this is going to have alot more grunt down the straight bits that join up the bends, where the MX5 loses those it caught in the bends, Porsches etc.

MX5Lives is on here IIRC, or on '5Nutz definately.. If you wanted more questions/pictures smile

theironduke

6,995 posts

211 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
Petrol Only said:
snotrag][b said:
Am i going to miss the power of the 190 BHP celica?.

No. People get caught up on this power thing too much. MX5's arent slow. They arent Fast, for sure, but they arent slow. A quick google shows that the Gen 7 Celica probably weighs upwards of 1400kg. Power to weight is probably actually better in most MX5s in that case.
Simlar style engines having to rev the nuts of them. However it is much harder to rag the nuts out of the celica than the 5's i have driven. Gearbox is ste in the celica in comparison .

Edited by Petrol Only on Friday 4th June 09:43
My 1.6 Eunos is spot on. Not mentally quick in a straight line BUT the whole driving experiance compensates. It is just so balanced and nimble, the gearbox is a joy to use and finaally it just revs and revs...the harder you drive them the better they get!

Jonny671

29,758 posts

212 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
Definately buy one!

I found an old bit of disused airstrip today, Tangmere or something.

RWD is the way forward.. Or sideways! biggrin

Petrol Only

Original Poster:

1,611 posts

198 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
Driven two today.

Mk2's

Both seemed to pull to the left. Known problems?
The gear box on one with 70k on the clock seemed clunky. Needs a oil change?
Which 5 has the biggest interior?
As the 70k one was a special edition with red leather etc. Name escapes me but someone here knows... seems to have less legroom with the bigger seats and heated bum jobbies then the standard cloth spec?
Also the brakes? How should they be? One was nothing... nothing than STOP.

So both cars had problems but there are plenty about. Great fun through the corners way way more planted than the celica. biggrinbiggrinbiggrin

DocJock

8,722 posts

263 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
They are very sensitive to geometry setup. The ones you drove were probably in need of setting correctly.

S Works

10,166 posts

273 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
If you want a Lotus, what's stopping you going straight to one?

Getting a front-engined, RWD car isn't really good practice for a mid-engined RWD car to be honest, they are completely different beasts. You're better off getting the Lotus and learning to drive it well on some high-performance driving courses (I can personally recommend carlimits.com and CAT driver training).

They are both super cars (MX5 Mk1 and Lotus Elise S1 and S2), but very different creatures. I know, I've had plenty!