What aircraft is this?
Author
Discussion

635djimmy

Original Poster:

4,142 posts

206 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Hi all
about 15 mins ago, I heard an an aircraft coming over, rear mounted engines, quite large quite low. I managed to get some pics of it with my 400D, these are cropped in, it had a very distinct wine coming from the engines too.

Heavily cropped


quite cropped


Anyone know what I saw?

Thanks

james.






Ayahuasca

27,560 posts

302 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
VC-10

Opel-GT

590 posts

201 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
VC-10
+1

635djimmy

Original Poster:

4,142 posts

206 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Ahh, Thanks.

Skywalker

3,269 posts

237 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Such a pretty aircraft.

635djimmy

Original Poster:

4,142 posts

206 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Was a lovely looking thing, it sounded great too.

eccles

14,178 posts

245 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Opel-GT said:
Ayahuasca said:
VC-10
+1
= VC11 ? confused

Ayahuasca

27,560 posts

302 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Beautiful, and now the fastest passenger aircraft in service iirc.


aeropilot

39,697 posts

250 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
Beautiful, and now the fastest passenger aircraft in service iirc.
Not commercial passenger though.

And with another two of the RAF's few remaining C.1K's being retired a few months ago, I'm not sure if there are any left still flying in the RAF?

The remaining K.3/K.4 versions flown by the RAF are not PAX configured.

anonymous-user

77 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
There will be two in the Queens Birthday flypast this Saturday smile

Keep your eyes out if you live anywhere between Southwold/Ipswich/Chelmsford/Hainault/Fairlops/Northolt.

Flypast is at 1pm.

http://www.raf.mod.uk/rafcms/mediafiles/02B4FA73_5...


muckymotor

2,420 posts

244 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
I'm in London this Saturday but was supposed to be at Canary Wharf at flypast time. If I head down to the riverside am I likely to be able to see the aircraft over London?

Pothole

34,367 posts

305 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
I used to live about a mile north of CW and we would always see the flypast on its way to Central London, you should do too

anonymous-user

77 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
South bank/ on Waterloo Bridge isn't a bad Vantage point. Follow a straight line from the Mall to Fairlops station and you have your flightpath. I'll be at the other end (Southwold) hopefully watching them form up. Bbmf will very likely be holding over Fairlops/Hainault. You wold probably do better heading slightly North West, as they do not follow the line of the Thames.

Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 7th June 23:58

aeropilot

39,697 posts

250 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
muckymotor said:
I'm in London this Saturday but was supposed to be at Canary Wharf at flypast time. If I head down to the riverside am I likely to be able to see the aircraft over London?
Possibly....if you are on the Westferry Road side of CW and look in a north-westerly direction towards the City across the bend in the river...??


muckymotor

2,420 posts

244 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Cheers all thumbup

tuffer

8,961 posts

290 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Biased opinion, Noisy POS. This is based on the fact my old barrack block was at the end of the runway at Brize and these feckers used to wake me up at all hours.

Turbodiesel1690

1,958 posts

193 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
If an aircraft looks right, it usually is right. Think that applies to the VC-10

Eric Mc

124,777 posts

288 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Beautiful aircraft.
Great engineering.
Commercial disaster.

Very much a subsonic Concorde.

M-J-B

15,377 posts

273 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Beautiful aircraft.
Great engineering.
Commercial disaster.

Very much a subsonic Concorde.
Why a commercial disaster Eric?

FourWheelDrift

91,828 posts

307 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
M-J-B said:
Eric Mc said:
Beautiful aircraft.
Great engineering.
Commercial disaster.

Very much a subsonic Concorde.
Why a commercial disaster Eric?
They only built 54. Commercially that's a disaster.