Mark V Golf 2.0 FSI
Author
Discussion

dontfollowme

Original Poster:

1,191 posts

264 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Hi,

Are these a decent compromise between nippyness and econonmy or are they just thirsty and not very nippy?

I'm coming from a 2001 1.6 Focus if that makes any difference.

Thanks

MintyChris

848 posts

223 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Is this the n/a 2.0 or the 2.0T?

2.0T is a good engine....not sure about the n/a one.



Edited by MintyChris on Tuesday 8th June 13:13

dontfollowme

Original Poster:

1,191 posts

264 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
The N/A 2.0. I can't stretch to a GTI frown

spiralp

143 posts

284 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Try looking at a 1.4TSI (170 if possible). These are quicker and more economical than the 2.0FSI. Should blow the socks off a 1.6 Focus.

va1o

16,118 posts

238 months

Monday 21st June 2010
quotequote all
spiralp said:
Try looking at a 1.4TSI (170 if possible). These are quicker and more economical than the 2.0FSI. Should blow the socks off a 1.6 Focus.
+1

2.0 FSI isn't the best engine in the Golf MK5. Stick with the TSIs and TDIs.