Going to look at a 1.6 UK Car tonight...
Going to look at a 1.6 UK Car tonight...
Author
Discussion

KingRichard

Original Poster:

10,146 posts

255 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Just looking for something to use as a track slag really.

Are the 1.6's quite capable? It will need a fair bit of work as it's an MOT failure but aside from the stuff on the failure sheet, what should I look out for?

Cheers smile

Munter

31,330 posts

264 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
I assume you're paying hundreds not thousands for it!

1.6 perfectly fine on track. Neither the 1.6 or 1.8 set the world alight in a line but the cornering makes up for it.

Look for:
Sill rust
Hood Condition...even the smallest of "cracks" on the edge above the window let water in...if you care on a track slag.
Oil leaks from the cam cover and CAS
Blocked radiator
Sticking rear calipers

And other stuff on the wiki! smile

KingRichard

Original Poster:

10,146 posts

255 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Cheers mate, yeah you'd be right assuming it's hundreds biggrin

Had a quick look at the wiki, can't believe I missed that the first time round banghead

How do you tell if the 1.6 engine is a crappy 90bhp or the 116bhp one?

Mark-2

1,338 posts

229 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
KingRichard said:
How do you tell if the 1.6 engine is a crappy 90bhp or the 116bhp one?
What year is it?

KingRichard

Original Poster:

10,146 posts

255 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
1993 on a K Plate

_Batty_

12,268 posts

273 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
KingRichard said:
1993 on a K Plate
crappy 90 then.
avoid.
plenty of cheapies about smile

KingRichard

Original Poster:

10,146 posts

255 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
_Batty_ said:
KingRichard said:
1993 on a K Plate
crappy 90 then.
avoid.
plenty of cheapies about smile
Is that definite?

MXOC lists post '95 1.6's as being the 90bhp version

Edited by KingRichard on Wednesday 16th June 13:57

KingRichard

Original Poster:

10,146 posts

255 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
_Batty_ said:
KingRichard said:
1993 on a K Plate
crappy 90 then.
avoid.
plenty of cheapies about smile
Is that definite?

MXOC lists post '95 1.6's as being the 90bhp version

Edited by KingRichard on Wednesday 16th June 13:57

hornetrider

63,161 posts

228 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
I thought the 1.6 was detuned for the '94 model year.

KingRichard

Original Poster:

10,146 posts

255 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Is there a way to tell the difference with the engine numbers or anything?

I need to know because I haven't driven anything with less than about 250bhp for a long time... I might not be able to tell the difference immediately between 90 and 116!

Risotto

3,933 posts

235 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
According to the UK Model guide on the Common faults/Buying giude wiki, the 1.6 was down to 88bhp from April 95.

EDIT: Found some info on the affected VIN numbers:

VINs starting JMZ NA18 B2 were 114bhp then from April 95 VINs starting JMZ NA C2 were 88bhp.

Not sure how reliable the info is though.

Edited by Risotto on Wednesday 16th June 14:35

MixxyMatosis

388 posts

192 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Dunno if this helps but mine is a 1600 UK K plate Too and mine seems to go quite well, I'd say it defiantly feels more than 88bhp biggrin

Mark-2

1,338 posts

229 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
i thought it was 115bhp up until 1994 when the 1.8 came out, then they introduced the crappy 90bhp 1.6 in 1995 as a budget option to run alongside the 1.8?

5harp3y

1,966 posts

222 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Mine is a 'K' ... its 115bhp

MX-5 Lazza

7,954 posts

242 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Mark-2 said:
i thought it was 115bhp up until 1994 when the 1.8 came out, then they introduced the crappy 90bhp 1.6 in 1995 as a budget option to run alongside the 1.8?
That.
Unless it's JDM in which case it's 114bhp regardless of year.

KingRichard

Original Poster:

10,146 posts

255 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
So basically, it should be cool as long as it's a UK car, with a JMZ NA18 B2 VIN Number?

That's really helpful, thanks.

If they are rusty is it quite obvious, or do they have lots of hidden nooks and crannies?

snotrag

15,480 posts

234 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Rust spots -

-Front wings where it curves down to meet the sill (wings bolt on). This is a good dirt trap, fills with wet mud from the front wheel and leads to rust outer and inner wings. Easily cleaned out though.

-Sills. Particularly the rear end. From the top of the outside section (directly below the door) right down as it curves under the car, to the seam that runs along the bottom. Watch out that the seam is not too battered.

-Inside lip of rear arch, from the bottom all the way round to the top.

-Front 'face' of inner rear wheelarch. There is an inspection hole here with a rubber grommet on that you could pop out if the owner is ok with it.

-Windscreen surround/pillars

- Top of sill section inside door shut - underneath and around the chrom kick plates. Again - you could unscrew these for an easy inspection.

Check the seam along bottom of the sills at each end there is a reinforced jacking point, either side of this is a small drain hole. Check they are not mangled/blocked (take a bit of wire with you). Otherwise the sills fill up with water.

Check the hood drain hole aswell, this exits through a little rubber tube that pops out infront of the rear wheel arch.

Check the two chassis rails that run the length of the car - they are often dented/scraped and this is a place where rust starts. Also the floorpan where it curves up at either end of the cabin - often dented and crunched here.

Subframes and wishbones usually have a bit of surface muck/rust on them. Avoid any that look like they've come out of the sea.
Also checking under the rear bumper, above the backbox will give you a good idea - obviousll filthy, rusty brown metal is bad, nice black metal is good.


Bear in mind that no matter what the owner tells you - theres no such thing as 'a bit of surface rust on the outside, but its solid underneath'. They go from the inside out.

As many people on here have found out, when it gets to the point where you can see bubbles on the outside of the sill, it generally means that the inside is falling apart.


In answer to your question though - yes, its generally quite easy to spot the difference between a terminally rusty one and one worth considering. Lots of the important bits are visible underneath, and you can get your head in the wheelarches etc. If you can park it on a high kerb that would be really useful, even better if they'll let you jack it up a few inches.

ETA - also note that black painted sills are normal and doesnt necassarily mean its been repainted, and also an unpainted car will have textured anti-stonechip paint all along the side up the the crease-line.


ETA again - i will assume that like most keen DIYers, that welding and bodywork are out of your remit. Its worth remembering that rust and bodywork is what kills MX5's. its expensive and difficult to fix.

Mechanical issues, even seemingly quite major ones, are generally easy to fix and nearly everything it DIY--able Even if you end up needing an engine there easy to get hold of and not expensive/difficult to swap.

Edited by snotrag on Wednesday 16th June 16:49

KingRichard

Original Poster:

10,146 posts

255 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
Thanks very much, most helpful smile

I'm printing this thread to take with me biggrin

5paul5

664 posts

194 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
If its a K plate it will be the higher output engine.

KingRichard

Original Poster:

10,146 posts

255 months

Wednesday 16th June 2010
quotequote all
5paul5 said:
If its a K plate it will be the higher output engine.
Thanks mate, I'll still have a pog at the VIN