is this a foul?
Author
Discussion

tonym911

Original Poster:

18,934 posts

228 months

Saturday 19th June 2010
quotequote all
In between spitting feathers last night I had a thought. You know when forwards 'climb' on defenders' shoulders to get extra height for a header? Would it be legal, at a set piece for example (where there's a free kick coming into the box) for a player FROM YOUR OWN SIDE to act as a support for the forward, to get extra height? Or would that be classed as unsportsmanlike conduct?

Cupid Stunt

528 posts

193 months

Saturday 19th June 2010
quotequote all
No, that wouldn't be a foul

tonym911

Original Poster:

18,934 posts

228 months

Saturday 19th June 2010
quotequote all
Hmm.... so why don't any teams do it?

Cupid Stunt

528 posts

193 months

Saturday 19th June 2010
quotequote all
No idea, it's crossed my mind on a lot of occasions but think about when a goalkeeper comes to claim a corner. If an opposition player jumps into him before he gets to the ball (or realistically even if the keeper jumps into the opposition, but that's another debate) then a free kick is awarded to the keeper. If a player from the keeper's own team impedes him it's no foul.

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

235 months

Saturday 19th June 2010
quotequote all
Have you seen the accuracy of crosses?

Blib

47,151 posts

220 months

Saturday 19th June 2010
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
Have you seen the accuracy of crosses?
hehe

tonym911

Original Poster:

18,934 posts

228 months

Saturday 19th June 2010
quotequote all
I can only think they haven't done it because they're too stupid to think of it. The rugby boys have been doing it for ever.

tonym911

Original Poster:

18,934 posts

228 months

Saturday 19th June 2010
quotequote all
Suspect the authorities would ban it if someone did try it as it would be construed as deliberately trying to gain an unfair advantage?

statts1976uk

191 posts

203 months

Saturday 19th June 2010
quotequote all
If memory serves me correctly someone did try it fairly recently and even though it is your team-mate it is judged to be dangerous play and unsportsmanlike conduct. It brought up some questions on a Sky Sports and they mentioned that idea has been floated about for decades but deemed illegal.

tonym911

Original Poster:

18,934 posts

228 months

Saturday 19th June 2010
quotequote all
statts1976uk said:
If memory serves me correctly someone did try it fairly recently and even though it is your team-mate it is judged to be dangerous play and unsportsmanlike conduct. It brought up some questions on a Sky Sports and they mentioned that idea has been floated about for decades but deemed illegal.
OK thanks, I don't have Sky on account of how they don't do a thatched dish

statts1976uk

191 posts

203 months

Saturday 19th June 2010
quotequote all
tonym911 said:
statts1976uk said:
If memory serves me correctly someone did try it fairly recently and even though it is your team-mate it is judged to be dangerous play and unsportsmanlike conduct. It brought up some questions on a Sky Sports and they mentioned that idea has been floated about for decades but deemed illegal.
OK thanks, I don't have Sky on account of how they don't do a thatched dish
they should do with the amount they charge for the monthly subscription!

tonym911

Original Poster:

18,934 posts

228 months

Saturday 19th June 2010
quotequote all
quite happy to not have it to be honest

MATTP77

697 posts

218 months

Friday 2nd July 2010
quotequote all
tonym911 said:
In between spitting feathers last night I had a thought. You know when forwards 'climb' on defenders' shoulders to get extra height for a header? Would it be legal, at a set piece for example (where there's a free kick coming into the box) for a player FROM YOUR OWN SIDE to act as a support for the forward, to get extra height? Or would that be classed as unsportsmanlike conduct?
LOL I thought this the other night too.....

It would turn into a rugby line out, crouch, on rio's back = deadly.

craggers

2,496 posts

307 months

Friday 2nd July 2010
quotequote all
MATTP77 said:
tonym911 said:
crouch, on rio's back = deadly.
It would be deadly for Rio as he got dodgy back !

JuniorD

9,013 posts

246 months

Friday 2nd July 2010
quotequote all
I've nead this mooted before and answer would be unsportsmanlike conduct.

Not really much different fom having the goalie stuff the ball up your jesrsey so you can run all the way down to the opposition goal.

cotney

554 posts

194 months

Friday 2nd July 2010
quotequote all
JuniorD said:
I've nead this mooted before and answer would be unsportsmanlike conduct.

Not really much different fom having the goalie stuff the ball up your jesrsey so you can run all the way down to the opposition goal.
laughlaugh

That image just made me laugh out loud, I'd love to see that in the WC final haha!! Zidane just running through, head down, butting people out of the way lol

Guvna

7,573 posts

203 months

Friday 2nd July 2010
quotequote all

Bonefish Blues

34,478 posts

246 months

Saturday 3rd July 2010
quotequote all
Guvna said:
Glorious!

Eric Mc

124,754 posts

288 months

Saturday 3rd July 2010
quotequote all
tonym911 said:
statts1976uk said:
If memory serves me correctly someone did try it fairly recently and even though it is your team-mate it is judged to be dangerous play and unsportsmanlike conduct. It brought up some questions on a Sky Sports and they mentioned that idea has been floated about for decades but deemed illegal.
OK thanks, I don't have Sky on account of how they don't do a thatched dish
Don't forget that lifting in lineouts was illegal in Rugby for decades - but it was still done. In the end, the rules were changed to make it legal.

On occasions, an unorthodox technique is invented by a player or a team. Remember that South American who took ultra-long throw ins by making forward tumbling flicks? That wasn't illegal - at first - because it had never been envisaged by the rules. It was eventually barred though.