The political self-serving continues unabated..
The political self-serving continues unabated..
Author
Discussion

Funk

Original Poster:

27,713 posts

239 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
Reading this really pissed me off.

http://order-order.com/2010/06/19/some-more-equal-...

Order Order said:
Portcullis House parliamentary offices are highly prized. They are light, spacious and luxurious. Only two floors are currently allocated to the Labour Party and unsurprisingly, all but a small handful are allocated to ex-ministers and very senior backbenchers

But what’s this? Extraordinarily, one or two first time MPs are so highly favoured that they are already ensconced within the hallowed portals that lesser lobby-fodder plot and plead for years to achieve. What possible influence could have been brought to bear that Jack Dromey has been catapulted into the Valhalla of ex-Cabinet Ministers within a mere six weeks of arriving in the House? Answers consistent with trade union & Labour Party values in the comments please…"


Quite astonishing that he's even there, especially with that "all-women" candidate short-list.

I don't think I can physically hate Harperson any more than I do. What an odious, vile couple.

groucho

12,134 posts

276 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
Look at the smile!! Don't you just hate it when the top lip rises 100 metres above the top of the tooth line?

Funk

Original Poster:

27,713 posts

239 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
They've got faces I would never tire of kicking.

bonsai

2,015 posts

210 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
groucho said:
Look at the smile!! Don't you just hate it when the top lip rises 100 metres above the top of the tooth line?
I'm astonished the supremely odious didn't get some gum shaving on her expenses.

XJ40

5,987 posts

243 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
That was Jackie Smith's husband wasn't it?

groucho

12,134 posts

276 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
XJ40 said:
That was Jackie Smith's husband wasn't it?
Same thing.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

274 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
XJ40 said:
That was Jackie Smith's husband wasn't it?
Jacqui, yes.

paddyhasneeds

67,916 posts

240 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
Funk said:
They've got faces I would never tire of kicking.
I would. But then I'd use my hands.

Funk

Original Poster:

27,713 posts

239 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
Not to mention Gordon Brown. He's only turned up at Parliament once since being booted out, and that was only to ensure he got paid his weekly wage of £1.3k.

Order Order said:
Once upon a time there was a man who claimed he woke up every day to “fight for a fairer Britain”. Britain may have said no, but he was returned overwhelmingly by one small part of it to represent and fight for them for the next five years. But this man is refusing to represent them and has now gone missing. Finally we learn he has abandoned his responsibilities and is sticking two fingers up at representative democracy to instead obsessively watch every single World Cup match on telly. While he rocks back and forward in his underwear, ticking off the games on his free Daily Mirror World Cup pull-out wallchart, the taxpayer is picking up the tab.

Gordon was quick to head down to Parliament to sign on for his cheques, so that for an hour and a half of football he is set to make around £45+ per match, or just over £3000 for the sixty-four game tournament. Find Guido any sports fan who wouldn’t love to be paid to sit around watching football. Thousands would have gone to the World Cup if it wasn’t for the cost and yet the taxes that deprived them of the trip are paying for Gordon to watch. Where’s the “fairer Britain” there?

If Gordon Brown needs time to reflect, plot revenge, write his book, find himself, detox, or whatever it is he is doing all alone in Scotland – fine – he should not expect to be paid for the pleasure by the taxpayer. There are 93,272 constituents in Kirkcaldy who are completely disenfranchised from the political system while their elected representative broods in a darkened room. Brown needs to make a decision – walk into the sunset and break completely from the House of Commons, or engage in the job he was elected to carry out and is paid to do. Guido is one of those inclined to say Brown is bonkers, but while this situation is allowed to continue the taxpayer is being taken for a fool. It is time to blow the final whistle on Gordon’s sulky withdrawal from parliament. He should either resign or “get on with the job”…
  • Fag-packet maths: 252 working days a year. 9 till 5 = 8 hours per day = 2016 hours per year. £64k divided hourly = £32 per hour = £48 per game. And that doesn’t include expenses.
Lazy fking workshy . If he isn't doing the job his constituents voted him in for, he should be put out to pasture. He is, to my mind, no better than your average Benefits Scummer.

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

263 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2010
quotequote all
It is genuinely difficult to comprehend how any of the buggers can stand out as 'ghastly' within the group they comprise. But she does.