RE: Cadillac CTS
Sunday 14th March 2004

Cadillac CTS

Has Cadillac moved on from nasty plastic and slushy handling? Robert Farago finds out...


When GM dropped off a Cadillac CTS, the car came pre-loaded with a CD by rapper Obie Trice.  I somehow doubt the General figured a taste of gangsta lyrics would help me understand Cadillac’s brand transformation.  Still, point taken.  There was a time when a Caddy wouldn’t function without a Carpenters’ 8-track turning its middle-aged occupants’ brains into mush - assuming the driving experience hadn’t already done the job. 

Even a cursory glance at the CTS confirms that customer mortality has forced Cadillac into a major re-think.  It looks nothing like Grandpa’s living room-on-wheels, or the front-wheel-drive, badge-engineered compact Caddies of yore.  The CTS is all sharp creases, meeting at odd angles, in weird places.  Like it or loathe it, the automotive origami looks sharp enough to draw blood.  That said, the design suffers from Peter North Syndrome; once you abandon the head-on perspective, there’s nothing much to see.  

Minimalist...?

The CTS’ minimalist interior represents another radical departure from the Chandelier School of Design.  Zebrano tree growers may despair, but the cabin is no longer dominated by acres of wood polished to plasticity.  The textured black plastic covering most major surfaces strikes the perfect balance between funereal and fun.  All the displays - from the white-on-black speedometer to the gently glowing climate control pictograms - are equally somber, equally funky.  Taken as a whole, the CTS’ interior displays a restrained, post-modern sensibility - right down to its bespoke typeface.    

The Caddy’s cabin scores in two other areas where American luxury cars are regularly trounced by their foreign rivals: ergonomics and tactility. 

The DVD nav exemplifies the manufacturer’s newfound understanding of its consumers’ cognitive function (or lack thereof).  Clearly labeled buttons surrounding the central screen offer seamless transitions from BOSE blasting to route guidance, to warning messages, to telecoms and back.  The Caddy’s helm-mounted volume control thumbwheel should be an industry standard.  And let’s not forget OnStar.  Their terminally cheerful, internet-savvy operators provide the ultimate hands-free information service.       

And guess what?  Caddy plastic is no longer made of ground-up toothbrush handles.  Fingers that once recoiled from cheap and nasty snickgear can now delight in smooth touch controls that respond with damped precision.  Someone’s also had a word with Cadillac’s upholsterer.  Where children once disappeared into the endless folds of cushy sofas, the CTS’ chairs are firm, clearly delineated and superbly tailored.  They even smell nice.   

In short, provided you ante-up 12Gs for the optional 1SC Equipment Group and DVD Nav, you couldn’t ask for a more convivial atmosphere in which to listen to musical tales of snub nosed .44s, crack dealers and women paid for sexual services.

Package Tour

The 1SC package elevates the CTS’ bottom line to a little over $42k.  At this price point, there’s nowhere for the CTS to hide; the financial damage places Caddy’s self-proclaimed “sports sedan” smack dab in the middle of BMW 330i territory.  No surprise then that the 1SC upgrade includes a performance package - complete with monotube shocks, improved brake linings, Stabilitrak traction control and a 3.6 liter V6 engine with Variable Valve Timing.

The 255hp CTS accelerates to 60mph in 6.7 seconds— just a tenth of a second behind the 330i.  In theory.  In practice, the five-speed auto box is dim-witted.  Give the CTS a serious throttle command and the engine responds with partial kickdown, followed by a lower gear and a sudden, frenzied lunge for the horizon.  With 252ft. lbs. of torque available at 2800 rpms, the 3.6-powered CTS delivers maximum thrust at a variety of speeds.  Yes, but… a CTS at full chat sounds like The Rental Car from Hell.

Soft Touch

The CTS’ handling reveals more dull DNA.  Fling the Caddy into a bend and you immediately sense that the company couldn’t quite bring itself to sacrifice low-speed comfort for high-speed control.  Hence the 17” wheels, which earn neither style nor performance points.  While the Nurnburgring-fettled “sports tuned” suspension helps tie things down, it can’t compensate for numb steering and remote control chassis.  All of which makes the CTS a talented GT, rather than Beemer-beating driver’s car. 

Is that important?  Hell yes.  Cadillac knows it can’t compete against the Japanese.  The Occidentals have built an enormous (not to say insurmountable) lead in the mass market for luxury sedans.  Their customers want it all: comfort, toys, reliability, service and price.  Sensibly enough, Caddy’s aiming its products at a smaller, more emotionally-driven audience: the Euro-snobs.  These customers are happy to pay a premium for style, prestige and performance.  The rear-wheel-drive CTS nails the first, phones in the second and sniffs around the third.

I’m tempted to conclude by saying two out of three ain’t bad.  Instead, I’m left shaking my head.  If only the CTS had a barrel-chested V8, better rubber, a six-speed manual and better handling.  Oh wait, that’s the new CTS-V.  As Obie says, bring it!

Link : www.cadillac.com

Copyright © Robert Farago 2004

www.thetruthaboutcars.com


Author
Discussion

AndySA

Original Poster:

902 posts

281 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
These are getting very common in the UAE. They look stunning in the metal, best looking american sedan in ages.

dinkel

27,536 posts

276 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
If only the CTS had a barrel-chested V8, . . .

Apr 23, 2003: "Heart of the CTS-V is a 400 horsepower 5.7-litre LS6 V8 coming from Chevrolet Corvette Z06"

unlicensed

7,585 posts

268 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
Mate of mine has one, comfy and fast(to an extent). Constantly slap him for not holding out for the cts-v though.

dick dastardly

8,325 posts

281 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
Great looking car, definately much more interesting than any other US saloons. Although the one in the picture looks like it could benefit from lower suspension.

p.s. Is this the car used in the Matrix sequel and Bad Boys 2?

v8thunder

27,647 posts

276 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
I like it. Only thing I'm not sure about is the 'Toyota Avensis'-lookalike head and tail-lights.

Are we getting any over here? I heard the CTS-V was faster around the 'ring than the M5.

dinkel

27,536 posts

276 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
v8thunder said:
( . . . ) I heard the CTS-V was faster around the 'ring than the M5.


Cadillac CTS V-Spec faster than M5!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to an article in CAR magazine issue 490 June 2003:
"Sometimes you can be a little too pleased with yourself. GM engineers testing the 400bhp Cadillac CTS V-Spec prototype at the Nurburgring Nordschliefe were all smiles after they'd offered the car to a BMW test driver who promptly beat his fastest ever M5 lap time. Until someone realised they'd just given the opposition a sneak preview of the fastest Caddy in history, that is. Doh!"

Wait till they drop in the V16.
www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=23&t=84819

v8thunder

27,647 posts

276 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
Well, they have just put a V10 in the new M5.

smele

1,284 posts

302 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
Yes, it was the car in the Matrix. In fact, I always think of the Matrix when I see one. Those photo's don't really do it any justice, it looks a lot better in real life.

thirsty

726 posts

282 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
What planet is this guy from? Speaking of Euro snobs ...???

I own a CTS... it's a great car. You can not compare the handling to a 3 series because it's bigger. In my opinion, it definately drives better than an Audi A6. I wouldn't be able to comment on a 5 series because it's been about 5 years since I drove one, and it was hardly pushed through the paces.

I do think the interior needs an upgrade as the center stack looks a bit cheap. However, just because Cadillac decided not to copy all the German cars with all the BMW look alike dashes, doesn't mean it's cheap. Living in California I noticed something about that dashboard... for some reason, it handles the heat from the direct sun and doesn't heat up the rest of the car. Somebody did their homework... or got lucky.

As for speed... it's fast. I don't care if there is some roar coming from the engine when you get down on it. No it doesn't sound like a cheap rental car... I should know, I rent cheap cars all the time when I travel. The engine is a state of the art 3.6 liter DOHC engine that puts out 255 ponies and I still get 23 MPG doing 85 mph (US gallons).

silverback mike

11,292 posts

271 months

Tuesday 16th March 2004
quotequote all
I think it looks like a big vectra.

dinkel

27,536 posts

276 months

Wednesday 17th March 2004
quotequote all
silverback mike said:
I think it looks like a big vectra.


It looks good! Stop moaning . . . US cars start to get exciting.

LuS1fer

42,806 posts

263 months

Wednesday 17th March 2004
quotequote all
It's such a shame that there's no room to convert the CTS-V to rhd. It's an even bigger shame they didn't launch it last year so I could afford one this year. At $50000, it's still a bargain in the US but adding import duty and VAT, it gets pricey.

Supersonic

1,163 posts

280 months

Wednesday 17th March 2004
quotequote all
silverback mike said:
I think it looks like a big vectra.
I'm sure it's great to drive etc etc............but my word it's ugly!

silverback mike

11,292 posts

271 months

Wednesday 17th March 2004
quotequote all
dinkel said:

silverback mike said:
I think it looks like a big vectra.



It looks good! Stop moaning . . . US cars start to get exciting.


I'm not moaning, it may look like a vectra, but I do like it. In fact, I liked the previous cadillac on sale over here.
I was probably the only one, but I did.

Bodo

12,425 posts

284 months

Wednesday 17th March 2004
quotequote all
dinkel said:
. . . US cars start to get exciting.

wfg

43 posts

298 months

Monday 22nd March 2004
quotequote all
This is the best looking American sedan in ages? This is a great looking car?

You guys unnerve me.

To each his own, yes, but I'm still unnerved.

It's not bad, but these praises are an exaggeration if there ever was one.

dinkel

27,536 posts

276 months

Monday 22nd March 2004
quotequote all
Are you getting the irony of this?

ErnestM

11,621 posts

285 months

Monday 22nd March 2004
quotequote all
IMHO the only decent looking Cadillac in production these days is the XLR:



...that being said, it took me a while to warm up to the angular beast...

ErnestM

lenra

3 posts

260 months

Monday 22nd March 2004
quotequote all
I test drove a CTS for about 1 hour. Putting the issue of aesthetics aside, I found the engine gutless. In addition, the quality of materials is still lacking. There were numerous moans and squeaks come from the seats and dashboard. The CTS is still GM junk hidden in a "marketing" mantle. I own a 2004 545i Sport. The CTS doesn't even come close.

robert farago

108 posts

288 months

Monday 29th March 2004
quotequote all
Yes, it does come close: to the 3-Series.