Discussion
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/talking_point/newsid_1923000/1923514.stm
I was going to suggest we give the BBC the benefit of our opinions but the general public seem to be doing pretty well on their own
I was going to suggest we give the BBC the benefit of our opinions but the general public seem to be doing pretty well on their own

As I said before, I think most people are getting right royally
off with the Govt at the moment, and that includes half the backbenchers !
We all know Speed Cameras are Tax Generators, and we are getting shafted by more taxes on more things every damn year.. Hopefully Tony and his Cronies will be out on their ears soon , but lets hope they are actually replaced by someone who
A: Likes Britain
B: Hates the idea of Europe Controlling the UK
C: Actually notices that people need cars to survive and lays off the poor damn motorist, and actually gets the sodding roads improved to better than dirt track standards

We all know Speed Cameras are Tax Generators, and we are getting shafted by more taxes on more things every damn year.. Hopefully Tony and his Cronies will be out on their ears soon , but lets hope they are actually replaced by someone who
A: Likes Britain
B: Hates the idea of Europe Controlling the UK
C: Actually notices that people need cars to survive and lays off the poor damn motorist, and actually gets the sodding roads improved to better than dirt track standards
The opinions on the BBC site are a glorious demonstration that the only way to get the British public to turn against speed cameras is to play up the aspect that they are a cynical means by which the government can relieve us of more of our hard-earned...
I know people are doing this, but my point is that once you get into the safety and ethics arguments, you get irretrievably bogged in semantics, ideological issues, and cries of "won't somebody think of the children". But we all resent the Government's stealth taxation portfolio and the sooner the public perception of gatsos etc is squarely as one of revenue generator with dubious or non-existant safety benefits, the better.
I know people are doing this, but my point is that once you get into the safety and ethics arguments, you get irretrievably bogged in semantics, ideological issues, and cries of "won't somebody think of the children". But we all resent the Government's stealth taxation portfolio and the sooner the public perception of gatsos etc is squarely as one of revenue generator with dubious or non-existant safety benefits, the better.
Gassing Station | Motoring News | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff