Tyre set up
Author
Discussion

V8mate

Original Poster:

45,899 posts

213 months

Saturday 17th July 2010
quotequote all
The standard (road use) advice for fitting two new tyres to a car, irrelevant of whether RWD or FWD, is to put them on the front.

Does the same hold true for a track car?

Mine's RWD and I need two new tyres. Would you still put them on the front?

JQ

6,608 posts

203 months

Saturday 17th July 2010
quotequote all
I don't know about track use - but for the road new tyres always go at the rear.

V8mate

Original Poster:

45,899 posts

213 months

Saturday 17th July 2010
quotequote all
Correct. Sorry - I'm just confusing myself.

End thread. They're going on the back smile

Munter

31,330 posts

265 months

Saturday 17th July 2010
quotequote all
Definitely back for track. Unless you intend to understeer through more corners than oversteer.... wink

5paul5

664 posts

195 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
Correct me if i am wrong but surely new tyres should go on the front as they do the steering as well. Having done several trackdays in my rear wheel drive car the front tyres by far get the most wear.

jon-

16,534 posts

240 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
5paul5 said:
Having done several trackdays in my rear wheel drive car the front tyres by far get the most wear.
If this is the case, you're not driving hard enough wink

GravelBen

16,375 posts

254 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
Personally if I have non-identical tyres I prefer the better ones on the front as I find understeer much less enjoyable than oversteer.

The best-tyres-on-back-regardless-of-any-other-factor argument I think is aimed more at folk who don't have enough knowledge or interest in driving to decide on their own preference, in which case that advice would probably be correct for them. (I should clarify nothing against people who prefer them on the rear though! Its your choice to make.)

Road cars practically always have understeer engineered into them (for obvious reasons), my tyre/alignment etc choices help neutralise this. smile

Edited by GravelBen on Sunday 18th July 12:18

V8mate

Original Poster:

45,899 posts

213 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
This thread isn't helping hehe

Basically, I have bought a set of wheels for trackday use on my E36; two of the tyres have had it but two are nearly new. But they're cheapies: Riken Maystorm 2.

Seems a shame to just throw them away, so I'm thinking I'll get a couple of decent summer tyres for the other pair, Conti/Yokohama/Toyo, and then run the Rikens out over this summer.

Just trying to decide (even though I thought I had decided) which pair to stick at which end.

Edited by V8mate on Sunday 18th July 12:41

GravelBen

16,375 posts

254 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
Personally I'd put the cheapies on the back and do some drift days to wear them out. hehe They may last a long time though if they're made of plastic!

Having felt the frustration of an MX5 getting power understeer in the wet with Kingstars on the front, then laughing my head off driving around on the lockstops after swapping them on the rear... I know which way I'd go.

V8mate

Original Poster:

45,899 posts

213 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
From what reviews I can find, the Rikens seem to be classic cheap summer tyres: reasonable grip in the dry, pretty poor in the wet and below average overall wear performance.

Chances are I won't use the car in the wet.

JQ

6,608 posts

203 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
5paul5 said:
Correct me if i am wrong but surely new tyres should go on the front as they do the steering as well. Having done several trackdays in my rear wheel drive car the front tyres by far get the most wear.
With relation the the road - it's got nothing to do with steering, it's about braking. If your front tyres lose traction under braking you'll understeer and generally go in a straight line which is controllable. If you lose traction to the rear tyres under braking the back end will snap out which is far less controllable and dangerous to the average driver in a confined environment. Obviously all PH'ers are driving Gods and would control the back end with a bit of opposite lock and just drift the car out of trouble !

On the track, I guess it's a question of what the OP wants, understeer of oversteer. I guess oversteer on the track is more controllable than on the road, where there's no room for manouver - unless of course it snaps-out too quickly and you end up in the armco backwards.

jon-

16,534 posts

240 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
JQ said:
With relation the the road - it's got nothing to do with steering, it's about braking.
confused

While you're 100% correct about braking on the road, the same applies to steering so I'm not sure why you discount that.

If you're cornering it's better to have the fronts lose grip as you'll understeer. If the rear loses traction first you'll oversteer which is harder to control.

To the OP: Budget tyres can be quite fun on track so don't discount using them on trackdays. They're generally so hard they wear really well, and will allow you to explore drifting if you stick them on the rear hehe

5paul5

664 posts

195 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
Well jon to correct you i am driving on the limit every time ! My car is a pretty standard mx5 and on the last track day the only thing that managed to pass me was a tvr tuscan and there was some pretty potent cars out thad day.

GravelBen

16,375 posts

254 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
jon- said:
If you're cornering it's better to have the fronts lose grip as you'll understeer. If the rear loses traction first you'll oversteer which is harder to control.
Not necessarily better, different - easier to control for drivers unfamiliar with oversteer yes (as they just tend to lift off), but mild oversteer is no harder to control than mild understeer and understeer gives less options for a competent driver to deal with the situation and adjust the attitude of the car.

Edited by GravelBen on Sunday 18th July 21:25

jon-

16,534 posts

240 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
5paul5 said:
Well jon to correct you i am driving on the limit every time ! My car is a pretty standard mx5 and on the last track day the only thing that managed to pass me was a tvr tuscan and there was some pretty potent cars out thad day.
It was a tongue and cheek comment. All trackdays should be spent sideways after all wink

GravelBen said:
jon- said:
If you're cornering it's better to have the fronts lose grip as you'll understeer. If the rear loses traction first you'll oversteer which is harder to control.
Not necessarily better, different - easier to control for drivers unfamiliar with oversteer yes (as they just tend to lift off), but mild oversteer is no harder to control than mild understeer and understeer gives less options for a competent driver to deal with the situation and adjust the attitude of the car.

Edited by GravelBen on Sunday 18th July 21:25
Fair point. Better should have been "safer for the general public".

davepoth

29,395 posts

223 months

Monday 19th July 2010
quotequote all
On the road understeer is safer. On the track oversteer is handy. wink

bikemonster

1,188 posts

265 months

Tuesday 20th July 2010
quotequote all
Understeer is safer because for most people, the immediate response to something being "not right" is to lift off the gas. With understeer, lifting causes more weight to transfer to the front wheels and restores grip and away you go in the direction you intended.

With oversteer, lifting off will unweight the rear, which will likely cause MORE oversteer and you reverse to the scene of the accident.

("You" in the above being "other people". As has been noted, PHers are driving gods.)