Discussion
rt.com (Oh, the irony)
Or let google give you a randomized selection of bias.
ETA- If you want TV news, Channel 4's evening news is consistently rated far higher than BBC (very low) or ITN (average) over at www.tvguide.co.uk
Or let google give you a randomized selection of bias.
ETA- If you want TV news, Channel 4's evening news is consistently rated far higher than BBC (very low) or ITN (average) over at www.tvguide.co.uk
Edited by grumbledoak on Saturday 17th July 20:39
Tommy Winchester said:
I switched from Sky to BBC, find myself back on Sky more now. Anyone point me in another diretion?
ITN is more balanced IMO than the BBC, but for general News I do watch Sky, but the Internet is more important now for news that really interests me, and analysis.allnighter said:
colonel c said:
CNN.
Always reminds me of the "Holy cow!" comments made by sensationalist reporters during the first Gulf war and stopped watching it ever since!Sheets Tabuer said:
Fox news, no idea what they say as I have the sound down but the presenters are dreamy 
I saw a Public Broadcasting show today that pointed out the fact that while Toyota was catching hell recently, all media outlets were on the bandwagon, all but the Fox News business team (Neil cavuto, Ben Stein, etc.). They were offering caution about blaming it all on Toyota and not laying some blame on the drivers. As it turned out, Toyota made many mistakes (a new Lexus recall is reportedly upcoming), however, drivers were found to be at fault in various cases. Fox was the balanced network. I am not sure if the U.K. gets all aspects of Fox or just the editorial/opinionated segments.
Fox News is owned by Murdoch, personally I think it is a great deal fairer than the other major US news channels such as CNN and MSNBC.
Regarding the comment about it being primarily US based, yes that is true, however, they cater to an audience who wants to know about things that interest them, not things that don't. They do a pretty good job all things considered.
Regarding the comment about it being primarily US based, yes that is true, however, they cater to an audience who wants to know about things that interest them, not things that don't. They do a pretty good job all things considered.
Anybody noticed how much airtime is being given to the losers of the election by the Beeb? Fatty 2 Jags, Gaylord Mandelscum, noBalls and all those other very shady characters, whereas the ruling coalition get nothing but cheap snide comments and unconfirmed rubbish reports from obviously very far left leaning PC reporters....
Andrew Marr - true to form, just had a leftie 'comedian' on, and the news he ranted on about was the fact that the (Evil) coalition have decided not to invest in something called 'The Green investment Bank' - stating very smarmily "...of course, the planet and environment isn't really important to these people..." (or something like that.
Hateful, hateful programme
Hateful, hateful programme
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


