Panorma - It Shouldn't Happen at a Vets
Panorma - It Shouldn't Happen at a Vets
Author
Discussion

va1o

Original Poster:

16,096 posts

230 months

Thursday 22nd July 2010
quotequote all
Anyone watching this? Its on BBC1 now. Pretty shocking behaviour really.

adycav

7,615 posts

240 months

Thursday 22nd July 2010
quotequote all
It's only just started! Nothing's happened yet!

crmcatee

5,788 posts

250 months

Thursday 22nd July 2010
quotequote all
Apart from Vine's jacket.




Jasandjules

72,003 posts

252 months

Thursday 22nd July 2010
quotequote all
The name of the show makes me think I don't want to watch it.....

Shaw Tarse

31,836 posts

226 months

Thursday 22nd July 2010
quotequote all
Doesn't look good, but I do wonder how biased the editing is?

cslgirl

2,215 posts

243 months

Thursday 22nd July 2010
quotequote all
It's really quite upsetting to watch.

fido

18,455 posts

278 months

Thursday 22nd July 2010
quotequote all
Shaw Tarse said:
Doesn't look good, but I do wonder how biased the editing is?
That's the problem with Panorama .. i've seen them try to smear industries/profession which i do understand and know about .. however, as the programme was commented on by professionals in the industry, it does have some credence. And that vet bloke was well dodgy.

4sure

2,438 posts

234 months

Thursday 22nd July 2010
quotequote all
sorry but no surprises really.

Theres a lot more things more worrying to me.

becksW

14,690 posts

234 months

Thursday 22nd July 2010
quotequote all
Yay great now everyone will think we are all the same, only thing I'd say is this was from several months of working there, not condoning what was shown but small amount of material for the amount of time she was there. The intubation scene was unfair, cats can be very difficult to tube even for a very experienced vet.

One of the reasons why I'd not work in a chain practice is too much staff turnover and too much risk of guidelines being misinterpreted.

Edited by becksW on Thursday 22 July 23:56

Meoricin

2,880 posts

192 months

Friday 23rd July 2010
quotequote all
fido said:
Shaw Tarse said:
Doesn't look good, but I do wonder how biased the editing is?
That's the problem with Panorama .. i've seen them try to smear industries/profession which i do understand and know about .. however, as the programme was commented on by professionals in the industry, it does have some credence. And that vet bloke was well dodgy.
They always have professionals in the industry to comment - the amount of negative things they found for the hour long show seemed to show Medivet in almost a good light. There were only a couple of real issues, and any business/profession has issues and individuals like those. Personally I think it came off looking more like Panorama decided on which industry to sensationalise next, and then struggled to do so properly.

fido

18,455 posts

278 months

Friday 23rd July 2010
quotequote all
Meoricin said:
They always have professionals in the industry to comment
Not on the TWO bash-the-bank episodes - aside from Angela Knight from the BBA who gets wheeled out almost in a token fashion - it's normally some left-of-centre academics. The last one about "why savings rates are so low - it's the banks fault?" skirted around the main issue i.e. the BoE rate is half-a-f8cking percent!

raf_gti

4,219 posts

229 months

Friday 23rd July 2010
quotequote all
How are the BBC allowed to get away with a programme like that?

Did they pick Medivet at random and go 'after them' or was it based on a tip-off by a member of staff.

I got the feeling there was an ulterior motive to picking Medivet, yet unfortunately for the BBC they couldn't find anything of real scandal to really shock the viewer.